![]() |
Originally Posted by PeezDog
(Post 987548)
That's what I mean. It will be my problem if you guys start having unrealistic demands and drag this out longer than it has to just because you want to burn the place down. Of course getting what you lost back is not unrealistic and I don't expect you to want anything less. I'm just getting the feeling that no matter how many improvements we get offered, a lot will turn it down just because.
Originally Posted by PeezDog
(Post 987548)
I don't know where your getting this notion that we (ASA pilots) want to keep our current work rules and that we want to force them on you.
Originally Posted by PeezDog
(Post 987548)
And we did buy you. So what? No one thinks that we are better than you or that you don't have the right to fight for what you want in the new contract.
Originally Posted by PeezDog
(Post 987548)
And before you say, I'm not saying we should just bend over and take it. We deserve a good contract that is good and an improvement for everyone. Anything less I will vote no. When I like what I see I will vote yes. Until then I will vote no. You have the right to do the same. Like I said before, chill out and wait and see what our MEC's come up with.
|
1. We are all on the same team
2. Xjt being bigger than ASA means nothing because when all of ASA votes yes to a slight improvement, it will only take a small percentage of scared pussies at XJT to vote yes as well and this thing passes. 3. A note on trip trading at xjt: I can make literally 50 different strategic trades in a matter of seconds online. No submitting and waiting for approval. That is nonsense 4. You guys arguing about two crappy regional airlines with two crappy contracts is crazy. I expect a contract that is similar to a mainline and pay proportionate to the size of aircraft we fly. No more of this anything smaller than a 737 falls off a payscale cliff. I am not going to be apart of the further downfall of the profession. As long as we keep accepting downright absurd pay for the amount of responsibility we carry and the investment in both time and money it took to get here, the more outsourcing grows and the more we will be whipsawed against whoever every time the CPA comes due. 5. Reality check: We make 6% less than contract '04. If we sign a contract in 2011 it will have been seven years. 7 years with a historical average of 3% inflation per year. So lets do the math. Current XJT rates + 6% to regain concessions + 21% for seven years of inflation = 28% pay increase to MAINTAIN contract '04 buying power! I dont know about you guys but my food and life is much more expensive now then it was in '04. WAKE UP and GET SERIOUS. Start thinking about your futures in this profession and stop trying to subsidize growth and management raises with your own paycheck. The buck stops here and I am terrified that my ASA brothers dont feel the same. |
Dojet,
I guess if you say its not a burn the place down mentality, then I guess I will have to take your word for it. It just comes off that way sometimes. I just hope that everyone has an open mind. And I'm not falling for that scare tactic either. I'm worried about us fighting each other. I guess you got me on a technicality there with who bought who. But it doesn't matter. If I hear any of that crap from the ASA guys, I will be the first to tell them they are dumb. I've been seeing the same crap coming from your side too, on here and else where. Its a shame we have those people on both our sides. I just want us to work together and get this done and get a contract thats fair for everyone. And for the chest beating to stop, its annoying. |
Nevermind.
|
Man it annoys me when people say "We (ASA) bought Expressjet!" Where do people come up with that crap? It just embarrasses me to be associated with those people. You cannot buy ASA stock because ASA has no money. If ASA has no money, then how did they buy another airline. The holding company acquired the two airlines and merged their certificates. It's as easy as that.
Phew........just had to vent a little. |
|
Sorry sweptback. I know you deleted your post. But what you wrote is just too easy to pass up, so here goes. Couple things come to mind. 1) ASA needs to educate themselves on the XJT line bid/LIW system. 2) The XJT line bid/LIW is NOT the ASA system of yore:
Originally Posted by sweptback
(Post 987642)
Sure, I'll give you an example.
Line bidding: Joe Pilot, #50 out of #75, bids all 38 lines with Christmas off because he thinks he can hold it. He bids no other lines. In fact, he can't hold it, and since he did not bid enough lines, he is assigned a line in lowest line number order, which is not what he would have wanted since he works Christmas. Joe pilot can also exercise another option. He can bid the 38 lines that have Christmas off, THEN opt out into the secondary bid. When this happens, he can do a couple things. 1) Bid a relief line and request XMAS off. Might happen, might not. If not, when the SLIW opens he can try to fix it via trade or bad day/worse day. The other option is to bid a reserve line that has XMAS off. IF Joe pilot is that senior, he can hold either a long call reserve line, or a late call/commutable reserve line that has XMAS off. And if he's a commuter, he can take advantage of the APW to minimize any hotel/crashpad time he'll incur by doing so.
Originally Posted by sweptback
(Post 987642)
PBS: Joe Pilot, #50 out of #75, preferences all the pairings with Christmas off but no other pairings working Christmas. The system initially builds him a complete line, but once it reaches the end of the category, it determines that it can't construct a complete schedule. The system then starts from the bottom of the list, adding trips to each pilot's schedule that had Christmas off until it reaches an acceptable pot of open time. The union and company agree on the solution.
So tell me, how is each scenario different? The number of lines working Christmas end up being the same. The seniority of pilots is protected. It just arrives at the same result a different way. Your turn.
Originally Posted by afterburn81
(Post 987654)
Man it annoys me when people say "We (ASA) bought Expressjet!" Where do people come up with that crap? It just embarrasses me to be associated with those people. You cannot buy ASA stock because ASA has no money. If ASA has no money, then how did they buy another airline. The holding company acquired the two airlines and merged their certificates. It's as easy as that.
|
I'm confused how this is different than the pbs system we have? I put on sheet one what I want..if it cannot build be what I want it goes to my second sheet. I bid a different way...try another angle. No luck...cool. Go to my third sheet. If you don't want to do it this way....bid reserve to get the days off you need. After all that...u didint get what you need...ok...trade, drop, swap...whatever...all in opentime and all same day...and sometimes instant. What's the big deal?
|
Originally Posted by dojetdriver
(Post 987684)
Sorry sweptback. I know you deleted your post. But what you wrote is just too easy to pass up, so here goes.
I deleted it mainly because it was a fairly unrealistic scenario. Under our PBS you can control every aspect of the bidding process, even unstacking (we have an unstack bidsheet that you can preference). The logic of the PBS will prevent unstacking from even happening, assuming you bid to your seniority in preferences. Under the unlikely event that unstacking happens, we have contractual limits on how many people can be affected. I still don't think you understand that unstacking happens on line building before the lines are even bid upon. I don't care who builds the lines, neither the company or the union will be satisfied with all the trips left over falling on the same days. They would rebuild the lines, shuffle things around, until the distribution was a bit more uniform. Then you can do your magic in open time, LIW, whatever, but you'll still get whatever line the company chooses to build for you if nothing goes through. If you guys seriously (and I truly dispute this) can bid one line working weekends and holidays, completely drop it and build another line from the pot that has all the desirable days off, then why do you even bid for lines? I understand that your complaint is that there's a lot of pitfalls and gotchas in PBS. I understand that you have seen PBS at pilot groups that don't have the workrules that we do go awry. But, I will say this. I have averaged 2-3 additional days off under PBS so far (compared to the lines the company used to build), and have the same amount of credit per month. I have literally doubled my vacation time under PBS. How is that bad in any way? One last question for you. Have you ever worked under a PBS? What system was it? If not, where are these negative views coming from? CAL? |
Originally Posted by sweptback
(Post 987788)
Under the unlikely event that unstacking happens, we have contractual limits on how many people can be affected.
Originally Posted by sweptback
(Post 987788)
I still don't think you understand that unstacking happens on line building before the lines are even bid upon.
Originally Posted by sweptback
(Post 987788)
I don't care who builds the lines, neither the company or the union will be satisfied with all the trips left over falling on the same days. They would rebuild the lines, shuffle things around, until the distribution was a bit more uniform. Then you can do your magic in open time, LIW, whatever, but you'll still get whatever line the company chooses to build for you if nothing goes through.
Originally Posted by sweptback
(Post 987788)
If you guys seriously (and I truly dispute this) can bid one line working weekends and holidays, completely drop it and build another line from the pot that has all the desirable days off, then why do you even bid for lines?
Originally Posted by sweptback
(Post 987788)
I understand that your complaint is that there's a lot of pitfalls and gotchas in PBS. I understand that you have seen PBS at pilot groups that don't have the workrules that we do go awry. But, I will say this. I have averaged 2-3 additional days off under PBS so far (compared to the lines the company used to build), and have the same amount of credit per month. I have literally doubled my vacation time under PBS. How is that bad in any way?
Originally Posted by sweptback
(Post 987788)
One last question for you. Have you ever worked under a PBS? What system was it? If not, where are these negative views coming from? CAL?
And if you want to sling names, that I purposely DIDN'T quote, have at it man. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:06 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands