Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.


User Tag List

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-25-2017, 10:13 AM   #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Flaps50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 FO FDX, C130 ANG
Posts: 532
Default MEC only retirement Vote?? from Block Rep

A good friend of mine was on a jumpseat last night from DEN said the Captain is a block rep, and straight from the Captain's mouth (with 7 other guys present) the Rep said the MEC "only" will be making the vote for the retirement not the crew-force as they are not required to send it to the pilots. When questioned about it, he just shrugged his shoulders, and said, "That's just the way it's going to be..."

It puzzles me how on Earth this has gone this far and no ones seems to care! They have presented a plan to the company and we don't know what was in it??? I'm starting to wonder what futures have been promised to this MEC for cashing in our retirements... Wake up FEDEX PILOTS!!

Anyone with more knowledge of this? If this is how we're being represented I'm dumbfounded by ALPA here!
Flaps50 is offline  
Old 11-25-2017, 10:25 AM   #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flaps50 View Post
A good friend of mine was on a jumpseat last night from DEN said the Captain is a block rep, and straight from the Captain's mouth (with 7 other guys present) the Rep said the MEC "only" will be making the vote for the retirement not the crew-force as they are not required to send it to the pilots. When questioned about it, he just shrugged his shoulders, and said, "That's just the way it's going to be..."

It puzzles me how on Earth this has gone this far and no ones seems to care! They have presented a plan to the company and we don't know what was in it??? I'm starting to wonder what futures have been promised to this MEC for cashing in our retirements... Wake up FEDEX PILOTS!!

Anyone with more knowledge of this? If this is how we're being represented I'm dumbfounded by ALPA here!
They canít change the CBA without a vote, if they do we sue them and they will fold like a cheap M&H tie.
Fdxlag2 is offline  
Old 11-25-2017, 10:54 AM   #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,385
Default

I sure hope your friend misunderstood, because that sounds completely unethical and impossible.
busdriver12 is offline  
Old 11-25-2017, 12:12 PM   #4  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Flaps50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 FO FDX, C130 ANG
Posts: 532
Default

I'm extremely worried by the attitude that seems to coming from these reps regarding this retirement idea.

We were told in the beginning this was a fact finding mission only, and we would be presented the information, and included in the decision making process. All of a sudden we are told to trust them, as they present the company a proposal. Forgive me if I am not as trusting as they would like as this effects my life in retirement, and I'm happy with the plan wording that we have now. We have not been presented any additional options or ideas other than what the MEC thinks is the "Best" option...?

So far we have generalities, but the company has been given undoubtedly useful information to base decisions while we have not. This is completely unacceptable IMO...
Flaps50 is offline  
Old 11-25-2017, 12:26 PM   #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11 Captain
Posts: 161
Default

Someone misunderstood or misrepresented. Absolutely no validity to what your friend is suggesting. Nothing can change without the membership's vote. This is not "side letter" material. Perhaps he was thinking about the MEC's ability (if they chose to do so) to authorize the NC to negotiate something without the membership's input/consent and authorize any TA's to be sent to a vote. All without ever consulting us until there's something to vote on. Which they can do but have sworn up and down they will not do.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
hoya saxa is offline  
Old 11-25-2017, 08:49 PM   #6  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Flaps50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 FO FDX, C130 ANG
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoya saxa View Post
Someone misunderstood or misrepresented. Absolutely no validity to what your friend is suggesting. Nothing can change without the membership's vote. This is not "side letter" material. Perhaps he was thinking about the MEC's ability (if they chose to do so) to authorize the NC to negotiate something without the membership's input/consent and authorize any TA's to be sent to a vote. All without ever consulting us until there's something to vote on. Which they can do but have sworn up and down they will not do.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
These guys seem in such a hurry to give away the best Airline A plan pension in the world I'm beginning to not be phased by anything I see anymore... It's obvious the main leadership is on a timeline because they're on track to retire before the next CBA is negotiated.

I'm afraid after voting it down, they will go back to the drawing board and tweak it a bit more and revote and revote until they get a passing deal...
Flaps50 is offline  
Old 11-25-2017, 09:19 PM   #7  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,606
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoya saxa View Post
Someone misunderstood or misrepresented. Absolutely no validity to what your friend is suggesting. Nothing can change without the membership's vote. This is not "side letter" material. Perhaps he was thinking about the MEC's ability (if they chose to do so) to authorize the NC to negotiate something without the membership's input/consent and authorize any TA's to be sent to a vote. All without ever consulting us until there's something to vote on. Which they can do but have sworn up and down they will not do.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Curious to know; why cant they change this through a side letter? Many things have been agreed to in this way before.
iarapilot is offline  
Old 11-25-2017, 10:17 PM   #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 1559
Posts: 1,491
Default

Well, from the info you posted, I'm going to guess Block 7 rep. Easy enough for someone to reach out.
MX727 is offline  
Old 11-26-2017, 04:14 AM   #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flying Boxes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 300
Angry

According to the ALPA email a week or so ago the MEC (MEC only) will vote to on whether to negotiate with the company for the VB plan. Any TA still would need to be voted on by the membership. (As I understand things)

The sheep here will vote for anything.
Flying Boxes is offline  
Old 11-26-2017, 05:23 AM   #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,286
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flying Boxes View Post
The sheep here will vote for anything.


The ship here will vote for anything that includes a "retro check" ...

MM

MaydayMark is offline  
 
 
 

 
Post Reply
 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? Guard Dude Delta 198140 08-17-2019 04:55 PM
Delta Pilots Association TheManager Major 9584 07-28-2015 12:15 PM
Capt Tony Hauserman for Block 4 Rep Gunter Cargo 29 07-29-2011 12:46 PM
CAL MEC Update Redeye Pilot United 92 10-19-2010 08:02 PM
NWA MEC Hotline RockBottom Major 0 01-07-2006 03:24 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:41 PM.