Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
Recent FDX hiring background >

Recent FDX hiring background


Notices

Recent FDX hiring background

Old 01-21-2018 | 10:11 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by flyfloats44
Although I didn't come from another major, I had offers and chose FedEx--with the A-Plan being the major factor in that decision. I see the 9% B Fund as the hedge against the lack of a COLA in the A fund. I really don't get why the union is going down this path.
I came from a regional, had other potential options. The A-plan/B-plan hybrid was a large factor, as well as the deadheading/deviation, and no passengers/wanting to try something different.

I have 30 years left and I wish to Keep the A-plan. As mentioned, having to go out on medical leave will kill your b-plan contributions.

I really like the hybrid options we have now and wish to keep it that way.
Reply
Old 01-21-2018 | 10:30 AM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 204
Likes: 2
Default

I left a legacy and chose FedEx due to:

1. Scheduling/line bidding/no PBS
2. A Fund. Especially, when combined with the B Fund
3. Ease of commute/deadheading options
4. Upper management
5. Boxes don't talk

I am a fan of our current hybrid plan, and would rather increase the B Fund to offset the A Fund. I really don't know why we would look at this outside of section 6.

Under no circumstance, do we ever contemplate PBS. Would kill our QOL.

Last edited by Rum Runner; 01-21-2018 at 10:49 AM. Reason: wording
Reply
Old 01-21-2018 | 01:04 PM
  #13  
New Hire
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: EP
Default

Does anyone know the percentage of interviewees that have a PE?
Reply
Old 01-21-2018 | 01:17 PM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 293
Likes: 4
From: 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Rum Runner

Under no circumstance, do we ever contemplate PBS. Would kill our QOL.
I agree with many of your sentiments, not necessarily this one. If you had a PBS like Continental did or SkyWest has you’re right, it would kill this place. One like ASA/ExpressJet has on the CRJ side ain’t that bad. It is all in the work rules and programming that are negotiated. I’m not saying it would be easy, and some factions would certainly be upset (commuters to home city), but it can be done. May just not be worth the work. PBS gets a blanket bad name, but not all forms are bad.
Reply
Old 01-21-2018 | 01:29 PM
  #15  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,964
Likes: 16
From: Midfield downwind
Default

Originally Posted by gatorhater
I agree with many of your sentiments, not necessarily this one. If you had a PBS like Continental did or SkyWest has you’re right, it would kill this place. One like ASA/ExpressJet has on the CRJ side ain’t that bad. It is all in the work rules and programming that are negotiated. I’m not saying it would be easy, and some factions would certainly be upset (commuters to home city), but it can be done. May just not be worth the work. PBS gets a blanket bad name, but not all forms are bad.
We already know what PBS will look like on Purple property: secondary lines. They demonstrate to us every month how it will impact the various parts of the contract.

PBS will absolutely wreck the benefits of the vacation system.

I am a "NO" voter for PBS, period.
Reply
Old 01-21-2018 | 02:07 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 21
From: Crewmember
Default

Originally Posted by gatorhater
I agree with many of your sentiments, not necessarily this one. If you had a PBS like Continental did or SkyWest has you’re right, it would kill this place. One like ASA/ExpressJet has on the CRJ side ain’t that bad. It is all in the work rules and programming that are negotiated. I’m not saying it would be easy, and some factions would certainly be upset (commuters to home city), but it can be done. May just not be worth the work. PBS gets a blanket bad name, but not all forms are bad.
PBS will destroy our vacation system.

We have the best vacation system in the industry, why give it up?

We have the best retirement in the industry, why give it up?
Reply
Old 01-21-2018 | 04:12 PM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 588
Likes: 139
From: B767
Default

I was hired last June and my previous 5 years in the airline biz used PBS. Line bidding was a bit cumbersome at first, but I turned a 9 day vacation into six weeks off. I'm a believer in line bidding to the death now.
Reply
Old 01-21-2018 | 04:33 PM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 204
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by gatorhater
I agree with many of your sentiments, not necessarily this one. If you had a PBS like Continental did or SkyWest has you’re right, it would kill this place. One like ASA/ExpressJet has on the CRJ side ain’t that bad. It is all in the work rules and programming that are negotiated. I’m not saying it would be easy, and some factions would certainly be upset (commuters to home city), but it can be done. May just not be worth the work. PBS gets a blanket bad name, but not all forms are bad.
PBS creates efficiencies for the company by removing conflicts with vacation, training, etc. It reduces the number of pilots that you need to operate the schedule, and therefore your rise up the seniority ladder would be slower. You can forget about 6 weeks off with 9 days of vacation as the last guy pointed out.

Granted, some airlines have it better than others. All depends on how it's negotiated. It would absolutely kill our vacation, regardless.

Take a look at our secondary line process if you want a glimpse at what it might look like.
Reply
Old 01-21-2018 | 04:46 PM
  #19  
The Walrus's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
From: Socket Drawer
Default

Anyone who would even consider allowing PBS here should be required to bid a secondary line for six months prior to voting.
Reply
Old 01-21-2018 | 05:15 PM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 21
From: Crewmember
Default

Originally Posted by Temocil27
I was hired last June and my previous 5 years in the airline biz used PBS. Line bidding was a bit cumbersome at first, but I turned a 9 day vacation into six weeks off. I'm a believer in line bidding to the death now.
When I was on the 777, and could bid 15 days in July, I could use 15 days and have 9 weeks off.

Bid a 12 day trip the first week of June, off the last two weeks.

5 weeks off in July.

Bid a 12 day trip the last week of August, first two weeks off.

You can't get 9 weeks off using 15 days vacation with PBS.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
av8tordude
Major
42
09-12-2018 05:55 PM
waterboy
Hiring News
44
04-24-2013 01:05 PM
AeroCrewSolut
Hiring News
2
01-26-2012 09:49 PM
PurpleTail
Cargo
27
10-17-2011 03:21 PM
CloudSailor
Cargo
40
04-26-2007 07:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices