![]() |
Originally Posted by threeighteen
(Post 3528436)
we still don’t interview during peak so no invites would be going out during this time
|
Originally Posted by C2078
(Post 3528909)
We have interviewed (zoom) in December the last 2 years. Is December not peak?
|
Originally Posted by C2078
(Post 3528909)
We have interviewed (zoom) in December the last 2 years. Is December not peak?
Originally Posted by threeighteen
(Post 3528911)
what? We have not done pilot hiring interviews via zoom
|
Originally Posted by bmxandjets
(Post 3528159)
Anyone getting called for interviews recently..?
|
Have also heard at RTAG FedEx was putting out they're back to hiring 200-250 a year, anyone know if that short term or moving forward now?
|
QUOTE=Readysetroll13;3529331]Have also heard at RTAG FedEx was putting out they're back to hiring 200-250 a year, anyone know if that short term or moving forward now?[/QUOTE]
recent schoolhouse rumor is 300 hundo next year including the pool. |
Originally Posted by OFT1
(Post 3529336)
QUOTE=Readysetroll13;3529331]Have also heard at RTAG FedEx was putting out they're back to hiring 200-250 a year, anyone know if that short term or moving forward now?
recent schoolhouse rumor is 300 hundo next year including the pool.[/QUOTE] So an additional 130? Or 300 on top of the pool? |
Originally Posted by OFT1
(Post 3529336)
QUOTE=Readysetroll13;3529331]Have also heard at RTAG FedEx was putting out they're back to hiring 200-250 a year, anyone know if that short term or moving forward now?
recent schoolhouse rumor is 300 hundo next year including the pool.[/QUOTE] 200-250/year would make sense since it covers attrition. |
Originally Posted by 170driver
(Post 3529483)
recent schoolhouse rumor is 300 hundo next year including the pool.
So an additional 130? Or 300 on top of the pool? |
Originally Posted by JohnnyDingus
(Post 3529501)
recent schoolhouse rumor is 300 hundo next year including the pool.
Could you expand on the attrition piece? New guy here, TIA |
Originally Posted by Readysetroll13
(Post 3529544)
200-250/year would make sense since it covers attrition.
Attrition = Retirements, mostly. Gotta replace those bodies as long as we aren’t shrinking. |
Originally Posted by AZFlyer
(Post 3529505)
No, way better than that. He said 300 HUNDO! Three hundred thousand pilots!
|
Originally Posted by FedEx Pilot
(Post 3529554)
Could you expand on the attrition piece? New guy here, TIA
I’m thinking there are a lot of people delaying retirement until a TA is ratified. If that happens, we could see hundreds retire within a month or two. |
Originally Posted by abides
(Post 3529913)
Attrition = Retirements, mostly. Gotta replace those bodies as long as we aren’t shrinking.
They would give up the bonus for not giving a year's notice. |
Originally Posted by PurpleToolBox
(Post 3529920)
I’m thinking there are a lot of people delaying retirement until a TA is ratified. If that happens, we could see hundreds retire within a month or two.
That bonus was in the last contract. It remains to be seen if it is in the new one. Also, if the new retirement is any good, some people might just punch out anyway. |
Originally Posted by Nightflyer
(Post 3529950)
They would give up the bonus for not giving a year's notice.
Yes, but most give notice. If you are trying to get hired at FedEx, and or already a new hire here, you need to understand that there is a lot of risk with the coming network changes. Our explosive growth is over. |
Originally Posted by PurpleToolBox
(Post 3530090)
That bonus was in the last contract. It remains to be seen if it is in the new one. Also, if the new retirement is any good, some people might just punch out anyway.
I don’t think anyone thought it would last forever. I just started in May from another Legacy and I feel much more comfortable here than any pax airline for this impending recession. |
Originally Posted by PurpleToolBox
(Post 3530090)
That bonus was in the last contract. It remains to be seen if it is in the new one. Also, if the new retirement is any good, some people might just punch out anyway.
That’s really not a bad thing… Explosive growth generally doesn’t end well for companies in the long term and that’s been proven over and over. FDX had to ramp up quickly to “answer the call” during the pandemic, but now that it has started to subside a more metered, well calculated approach should be the answer going forward. Time will tell if the new leadership team has what it takes, but hopefully the BOD and shareholders will hold them accountable. As far as network changes, those happen everywhere and should never be a surprise, it’s a business and it needs to fluctuate with demand, etc. |
Originally Posted by PurpleToolBox
(Post 3530090)
Yes, but most give notice. If you are trying to get hired at FedEx, and or already a new hire here, you need to understand that there is a lot of risk with the coming network changes. Our explosive growth is over.
|
Originally Posted by Urine Trouble
(Post 3536490)
Can you elaborate on what the coming network changes will be?
|
Originally Posted by Rajplt
(Post 3536977)
Our flying is said to decrease. Our open trips have been greatly reduced, Some fleets have next to nothing available on our “open time” board. That being said, UPS teamsters (non pilots) tend to be far apart from management at the moment. If things don’t improve, I wouldn’t be surprised in the coming months if we get some of UPS’s business as a result. That could soften the blow to our operations as we slide back down to normal. Conjecture from a line slime pilot who knows little
|
Originally Posted by opt0712
(Post 3537049)
… Network 2.0 will involve more trucking via Ground/Freight/LTL at the expense of reduced flight hours. Further, an overhaul of which aircraft we fly to certain destinations will be evaluated…But by no means is the sky falling here.
The 2Q earnings call scheduled for December 20th may give us more information on what’s to become of our flying. UPS beat earnings and didn’t scream the doom and gloom like FedEx leadership. We know management has mentioned more cuts to come after peak. |
Originally Posted by PurpleToolBox
(Post 3538531)
The union Scheduling Improvement Group called this peak, “the least peaky Peak ever.” That isn’t good.
The 2Q earnings call scheduled for December 20th may give us more information on what’s to become of our flying. UPS beat earnings and didn’t scream the doom and gloom like FedEx leadership. We know management has mentioned more cuts to come after peak. Did FedEx just ballon up to answer the call for covid and now things are going back to “normal?” over a billion in profits, seems weird to hear people talk about doom and gloom. just curious. |
Originally Posted by PurpleToolBox
(Post 3538531)
The union Scheduling Improvement Group called this peak, “the least peaky Peak ever.” That isn’t good.
The 2Q earnings call scheduled for December 20th may give us more information on what’s to become of our flying. UPS beat earnings and didn’t scream the doom and gloom like FedEx leadership. We know management has mentioned more cuts to come after peak. |
Originally Posted by opt0712
(Post 3538598)
UPS is a trucking company with jets. Of course they're more efficient. And they aren't in contract negotiations.
They are in contract negotiations. The kind that doesn’t require the NMB to go on strike. |
Originally Posted by FXLAX
(Post 3538612)
They are in contract negotiations. The kind that doesn’t require the NMB to go on strike.
|
Originally Posted by opt0712
(Post 3538625)
So the TA they signed doesn't count? Which sections are still open in negotiations?
The truck drivers covered by teamsters are in negotiations. |
Originally Posted by opt0712
(Post 3538598)
UPS is a trucking company with jets. Of course they're more efficient. And they aren't in contract negotiations.
|
Originally Posted by 170driver
(Post 3538626)
The truck drivers covered by teamsters are in negotiations.
|
Originally Posted by opt0712
(Post 3538625)
So the TA they signed doesn't count? Which sections are still open in negotiations?
They have more than one work group that is unionized. And as far as I know only the pilots fall under the RLA. Which is why they wanted and extension with them so that they can have all hands on deck for the real fight to come. |
Originally Posted by Rajplt
(Post 3536977)
Our flying is said to decrease. Our open trips have been greatly reduced, Some fleets have next to nothing available on our “open time” board. That being said, UPS teamsters (non pilots) tend to be far apart from management at the moment. If things don’t improve, I wouldn’t be surprised in the coming months if we get some of UPS’s business as a result. That could soften the blow to our operations as we slide back down to normal. Conjecture from a line slime pilot who knows little
You do know that the current Teamsters contract doesn’t expire for another 10 months right? Negotiations just started in August. There won’t be a strike and a new contract will be in place by August 1st 2021. |
Originally Posted by Tango Uniform
(Post 3539313)
You do know that the current Teamsters contract doesn’t expire for another 10 months right? Negotiations just started in August. There won’t be a strike and a new contract will be in place by August 1st 2021.
|
Our esteemed president just sent of loud and clear message about unionized labor’s chances of being released to strike. He said he was pro labor but when rubber met the road he bailed. What an embarrassment his term has been.
|
Originally Posted by opt0712
(Post 3538598)
UPS is a trucking company with jets. Of course they're more efficient. And they aren't in contract negotiations.
|
Originally Posted by Moosefire
(Post 3539435)
That adage is pretty stale… we’ve got a lot of trucks and they’ve got a lot of airplanes these days.
Another reason why FDX has more flights, UPS prefers to fly less frequency and more volume, one of the reasons they love the 74, especially the -8F. In a given route, FDX may perform 2 flights, UPS only 1. And FDX seems to do more point to point, UPS flies very little routes outside the traditional “hub and spoke” system. Yet revenue is marginally higher at UPS, but profitability is substantially higher. Packages get delivered on time, regardless how they get moved. Does it mean trucking them is cheaper and more efficient? I have no knowledge of internal operations or cost structure beyond this basic info, but it sure seems like it. This is not a knock against FDX or for UPS, just elaborating on your “adage is pretty stale” comment, because that adage really does explain the difference between the companies. FDX has been slowly been trying to vertically integrate the network, but the contractor model is just one of the issues. They could make this happen overnight, but they are hell bent on the contractor model. |
Getting back on topic.
new class starting tomorrow. mem11 mem57 mem300 oak767 mem11 mem300 mem300 mem11 mem57 mem57 mem300 mem300 mem300 mem300 mem11 mem11 mem57 |
Interesting drop....
Who thinks this might be the last time for a while that new hires will be going into the MD, Bus, and 75? From some of the stuff I've been hearing, looks like next year's hiring will mainly be focused on placing bodies into the 76 and 777. |
Originally Posted by Kenny Powers
(Post 3540731)
Interesting drop....
Who thinks this might be the last time for a while that new hires will be going into the MD, Bus, and 75? From some of the stuff I've been hearing, looks like next year's hiring will mainly be focused on placing bodies into the 76 and 777. |
Does anyone know the total number of pilots hired in 2022 and 2021?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Kenny Powers
(Post 3540731)
Interesting drop....
Who thinks this might be the last time for a while that new hires will be going into the MD, Bus, and 75? From some of the stuff I've been hearing, looks like next year's hiring will mainly be focused on placing bodies into the 76 and 777. Then additionally there are a significant number from 21-01 that are awaiting training for both 76 & 77. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:06 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands