Denying Jumpseaters
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
Posts: 1,162
You guys comparing sitting with operating crewmembers as the same as jumpseaters are missing the point, especially in 767. Adding a full cockpit of JSers more than doubles the risk. Given the high contagion factor of this virus, the long incubation time and how many victims are asymptomatic I think adding JSers on the flight deck is problematic. If a capt is concerned and denies a JSer Flight Deck acce its completely within his purview and if a JSer doesnt understand that and gets butthurt that reflects more on him than the Capt. There are more than a few pilots here that have some underlying conditions that can make this virus life threatening. Everyone be safe.
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 105
Let this topic be the starter. We are fighting over PIC authority. Are we serious as a pilot group? Its the captains choice who rides the jump seat plain and simple. Always has been and always should be. The person who started this thread came on with no information and throws a bomb dogging one of our captains with no detailed information of the situation. This same thing is going on with jetflyers. I know many people who post on both of these websites with half truths and purposeful lies. They do it to spread deceitfulness. It then breads within the group. In a previous life the pilot group did a much better job stifling this behavior because they understood it repercussions. We in fight over everything. Even the stuff that should very very obvious just like this topic.
also remember some of those “whiny” crewmembers May be the reason you wanted to come here because they “whined” to get better things in a contract to make THIS company more appealing than the last non whiny place YOU LEFT.
Last edited by MD11FLYER; 03-28-2020 at 09:11 PM.
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,224
You guys comparing sitting with operating crewmembers as the same as jumpseaters are missing the point, especially in 767. Adding a full cockpit of JSers doubles the risk. Given the high contagion factor of this virus, the long incubation time and how many victims are asymptomatic I think adding JSers on the flight deck is problematic. If a capt is concerned and denies a JSer Flight Deck access its fine and if a JSer doesnt understand that and gets butthurt that reflects more on him than the Capt. There are more than a few pilots here that have some underlying conditions that can make this virus life threatening. Everyone be safe.
Unless they are flying in a hazmat suit, there’s a great opportunity to get the virus when they go to work.
#34
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
i threw a bomb?? I literally repeated what the chief pilot said in his SCP update!! He gave no information either so how am i supposed to give information ... he asked for us to basically look out for each other ..I’m not on jetflyers and honestly rarely post on here ..i tend to keep my life away from FEDEX just that ..but if you decide jetflyers or other forums is a place you want to hang than YES you’ll find people complaining...the MAJORITY of our crew force goes to work flies and goes home.. stay off whining websites ...as far as you comparing your old crew force to your new crew force you can always go back to your old one because comparing the two is pointless .. and if you feel this crew force is too whiny for you well you can go back to your non whiny crew force but i bet this place is better hence you are here ...I’m not leaving a jumpseater .. that’s me.. my decision .. and I’ll deal with it ... other captains have the right to do what they’d like ..but if you have a purple badge and need a ride I’ll get you there ..
also remember some of those “whiny” crewmembers May be the reason you wanted to come here because they “whined” to get better things in a contract to make THIS company more appealing than the last non whiny place YOU LEFT.
also remember some of those “whiny” crewmembers May be the reason you wanted to come here because they “whined” to get better things in a contract to make THIS company more appealing than the last non whiny place YOU LEFT.
Let me clarify. I wasn't calling you whiny just said some of our crew members are. I just simply stated you posted an incomplete story with a conclusive statement. Would you take 5 jumpers on a 4 man crew DXB-MEM in a 777? Would you take 4 jumpers on a 767 (all in the flight deck) with a 3 man crew from LFPG-MEM? Maybe that Captain who denied the jumpers wasn't notified by the jumpers ahead of time they had all been in high risk areas. Do you see all the scenarios we could come up with? We don't have the facts. This is why we must never jump to conclusions. We must never chastise a pilot for holding a line on Safety.
We are in a weird situation but some folks have tighter risk tolerance than others. This is why we must set the break if the airplanes are not cleaned. This is why we must not waiver on PIC authority. This is why we must call in fatigued if we are fatigued due to poor hotels/lounges. Its all about safety. Once you give it up ain't no getting it back. As for leaving my previous gig I was clear on that. This place suits me much better.
My bigger point was we as a group need to stop pointing the finger at each other and the union and point it squarely on the company who was late to react to a lot of this and now they want us to bend over backwards to bail them out. This was seen by many months ago as this spread across Asia. I was one of many who was posting about it on this forum. I think the company is trying like crazy over the past week with some of the changes that have happened but it was to late. They lost the good will of many including me. I want to see this company be successful but not squarely on my back while they kick me in the groin.
#35
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 82
I’m not sure how often this is happening lately, but the situation I’m aware of involved 5 company scheduled jumpers (77 MEM-CDG). The captain refused them seats....I wonder if this was pushback against the company rather than refusing commuters a ride home?
#36
Since I doubt there are many commuters trying to get "home" to CDG, I'd say that's a pretty good guess. Obviously that assumes there are commercial flights available to position those 5 pilots. If there are, the company has no business putting us on our own jumpseats. Maybe also, the captain wasn't interested in increasing his chance of a random exposure by 250%. Either way, good call, IMO. I'll bring along someone trying to get home any time and accept the extra risk. Positioning crews for revenue flights is a whole different story. Find a flight and put them on it. Assuming, of course, that the destination country will let them in as a passenger with the appropriate crew waivers. If the only way to get them into that country is as a crew on the GenDec of one of our flights, then there's not much point in falling on one's sword over that.
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,227
If the company is deadheading a pilot on a leg where airline seats are available, then it's his/her call whether to comply or fight.
But if they get to my flight and they're jumpseating, they're going. I don't refuse jumpseaters unless there's a safety issue - and I can't argue that jumpeaters increase my total risk by any noticeable amount. I get more exposure to more pilots in the crew bus and AOC than in the cockpit.....
But if they get to my flight and they're jumpseating, they're going. I don't refuse jumpseaters unless there's a safety issue - and I can't argue that jumpeaters increase my total risk by any noticeable amount. I get more exposure to more pilots in the crew bus and AOC than in the cockpit.....
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,820
Don't know what "Botyom" is, but flight deck JS is PIC authority. So, in the 777 and 767, that is all JS's. The seats behind the door belong to the company. We had this fight with the company over captains authority a decade before you were here.
#40
all domestic flights should be given masks. All intl flights to china were given masks when china was the epicenter. Well the US is now full on with this virus. Its time for Fedex to do the same now for domestic crews as they did for intl. crews.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post