![]() |
If the membership new in '13-'15 we were going to run out of money do to miss-management of our dues, I bet there would have been more noise. $14.1 Million of our dues money is a lot to spend on a contract especially when the MEC did not even try for the MCF $5 Million grant back then. I remember how shocked the audience was when the then Sec/Tres told the membership there was just over $400K left in the bank when the "TA in concept" was agreed to by the NC and $14.1 million was spent on the effort. How much later was the language finished? Oh and has contract '15 been fully implemented yet? How is that great Secondary Line Generator anyway? I still remember a quote from one who was in the know, "they travel in entourages and stay in suits." When I heard we were out of money, I understood the quote better.
NO if we had known then, I think things would have been different. So we can learn from the past or not. This time you can't say you didn't know. Thankfully, this time around our dues are being watched a bit closer. I give credit where it is due. There is still some FPL National should be paying like Legislative Affairs for cargo issues to name one. I haven't seen much lately from national on any cargo issues, have you? |
The only place I see hypocrisy is within us line pilots ourselves. I fly with them weekly. We say we want big gains in pay, retirement and QOL and then never stand behind those demands with actions. The company isn't stupid. Why would they improve these things when most are still doing EXTRA for the pay and retirement we currently have. The hypocrisy lies within 3/4 of our pilots.
|
Originally Posted by Noworkallplay
(Post 3393177)
The only place I see hypocrisy is within us line pilots ourselves. I fly with them weekly. We say we want big gains in pay, retirement and QOL and then never stand behind those demands with actions. The company isn't stupid. Why would they improve these things when most are still doing EXTRA for the pay and retirement we currently have. The hypocrisy lies within 3/4 of our pilots.
|
Originally Posted by BrianH
(Post 3393142)
If the membership new in '13-'15 we were going to run out of money do to miss-management of our dues, I bet there would have been more noise. $14.1 Million of our dues money is a lot to spend on a contract especially when the MEC did not even try for the MCF $5 Million grant back then. I remember how shocked the audience was when the then Sec/Tres told the membership there was just over $400K left in the bank when the "TA in concept" was agreed to by the NC and $14.1 million was spent on the effort. How much later was the language finished? Oh and has contract '15 been fully implemented yet? How is that great Secondary Line Generator anyway? I still remember a quote from one who was in the know, "they travel in entourages and stay in suits." When I heard we were out of money, I understood the quote better.
NO if we had known then, I think things would have been different. So we can learn from the past or not. This time you can't say you didn't know. Thankfully, this time around our dues are being watched a bit closer. I give credit where it is due. There is still some FPL National should be paying like Legislative Affairs for cargo issues to name one. I haven't seen much lately from national on any cargo issues, have you? |
Originally Posted by BrianH
(Post 3392856)
I tried to add term limits to the committee structure for leadership positions, but that never made it to a discussion level.
So ask your reps about FPL and who claims the most, then go do the math. 100%? You be the judge. |
Originally Posted by kronan
(Post 3393092)
All of those things you're commenting on happened AFTER the TA was presented to the membership...as a comparison to the Now Versus Then...just don't recall a repetitive attack on ALPA leadership in 2013 as we negotiated towards what wound up being CBA2015
|
Originally Posted by kronan
(Post 3393092)
All of those things you're commenting on happened AFTER the TA was presented to the membership...as a comparison to the Now Versus Then...just don't recall a repetitive attack on ALPA leadership in 2013 as we negotiated towards what wound up being CBA2015
Really, so recalling a rep/reps in 2012 because they wanted to end the 2011 bridge contract as provided in the agreement and enter negotiations wasn't an attack on reps? Didn't the company agree to continue good faith negotiations during the duration of the bridge contract in order to expedite negotiations? So, in reality, those expedited negotiations lasted from 2010 until 2015. That really gets my hopes up that we will negotiate a leading contract by May. |
Originally Posted by Anthrax
(Post 3393248)
still waiting on that DM so we can explore our differences over a cup of joe. on me, because you my friend, if you are a line pilot, are asking for an illegal job action, and don’t think for one moment that the company won’t make an example out of you. or maybe you’re not a pilot and you’re trying to incite disturbances within the ranks. tell me, all these pilots you claim that are flying extra, have you asked them about it? of course not, because the first call would be to the DO and you’d be met with instant karma. but you’ll get on here and blab away, and so let me say as a professional courtesy to you, not that you deserve any, the company can easily find out who you are, if you are who you say you are, and if you are it’s no wonder we’re in the sorry state that we’re in as a union. also, maybe you should run for office and work to change the contract that allows for drf/vlt, et al., work that is presently protected in the contract and fully enforceable by law. so we must part ways, nobrains, and i’m wishing you the worst of all possible luck.
|
Working Extra
This is a reply to all those that are upset about working extra. Instead of casting net on ALL how about we consider certain circumstances. I am a VERY JR 75 Capt. I do not control line assigned. So with my carryover trip it knocked out 24 hours in April. In view add since I am so JR I could not get a trip that fit my footprint So how do I take a 24 hour hit in a month… 3 six hour days at AVA = 27 hours close enough.
Let’s not forget about all the instructors that justify working extra. “ I have to be there to get you checked out or they will cancel your training” LET THEM CANCEL TRAINING And then they will hire more instructors and your gravy train will end also and we will go NOQ due to instructor shortage. A great domino effect. Please quit casting nets |
Originally Posted by HD Driver
(Post 3393821)
This is a reply to all those that are upset about working extra. Instead of casting net on ALL how about we consider certain circumstances. I am a VERY JR 75 Capt. I do not control line assigned. So with my carryover trip it knocked out 24 hours in April. In view add since I am so JR I could not get a trip that fit my footprint So how do I take a 24 hour hit in a month… 3 six hour days at AVA = 27 hours close enough.
Let’s not forget about all the instructors that justify working extra. “ I have to be there to get you checked out or they will cancel your training” LET THEM CANCEL TRAINING And then they will hire more instructors and your gravy train will end also and we will go NOQ due to instructor shortage. A great domino effect. Please quit casting nets I understand not getting anything that perfectly fits your days off. It happens. Many of us have to fly trips that overlay things we would rather be home for. How about doing MU when OT opens? Instead you are waiting around for AVA? I think that is the difference most see. Just sayin As for instructors I would agree that dichotomy doesn’t pass mustard. So now you see the discontent many have with the numerous “situations” and excuses people make to enrich themselves. All at the cost of those not making excuses. Look at it this way. When does AVA/vbb/drft get offered? You do you. Just then be ok with 3+ year negotiations and COLA’s |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:54 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands