Did we excercise the 767 options in December?
#21
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by CloudSailor;[url=tel:3750257
3750257]The very day the POS TA was to become our CBA, how many hundreds of credit hours (over 1,000?) dropped into MD-11 open time?
(Facts and rumors).
(Facts and rumors).
#22
Thanks for answering.
I knew it was over 1,000. But 7,000 WB credit hours - amazingly dropping into Open Time the very day that our new concessionary CBA was to take effect. That is just such an insane coincidence!
Remember the old distractions and disinformation, as pats ramp up the fear and uncertainty necessary for 50%+1 on TA 1.1 - due before the end of the April bid month.
I knew it was over 1,000. But 7,000 WB credit hours - amazingly dropping into Open Time the very day that our new concessionary CBA was to take effect. That is just such an insane coincidence!
Remember the old distractions and disinformation, as pats ramp up the fear and uncertainty necessary for 50%+1 on TA 1.1 - due before the end of the April bid month.
#23
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Attempt 1 to temporarily fill LEC 26 with old guard failed as 2/3 elected reps took the interim seats. I argue this week was attempt 2 to get those seats filled with old guard, and any others would be a bonus.
IF (and that’s a big if, I get it) the senior/older retirement crowd is pushing for a TA1.1 that still improves retirement at the expense of QOL, pay and scope (what TA1 did - pitting senior vs junior), they have two deadlines approaching that make it difficult to forward another concessionary contract. The first deadline is 1 Mar, when LEC 26 elected reps take their permanent seats. The second deadline is when PM is replaced. Cancellation of Tuesday’s meeting effectively closed the door for the MEC to send TA1.1 to the pilot group before 1 Mar.
Tell me where I screwed up that math 🤷🏼♂️
#24
I think the window for 50.1% might be almost completely shut. Recalls voted for this week would have to run for 30 days and if the votes were rushed, that would leave a little over a week the end of Feb for the MEC to vote and send TA1.1 to the pilot group…before the LEC 26 permanent reps take their seats 1 Mar.
Attempt 1 to temporarily fill LEC 26 with old guard failed as 2/3 elected reps took the interim seats. I argue this week was attempt 2 to get those seats filled with old guard, and any others would be a bonus.
IF (and that’s a big if, I get it) the senior/older retirement crowd is pushing for a TA1.1 that still improves retirement at the expense of QOL, pay and scope (what TA1 did - pitting senior vs junior), they have two deadlines approaching that make it difficult to forward another concessionary contract. The first deadline is 1 Mar, when LEC 26 elected reps take their permanent seats. The second deadline is when PM is replaced. Cancellation of Tuesday’s meeting effectively closed the door for the MEC to send TA1.1 to the pilot group before 1 Mar.
Tell me where I screwed up that math 🤷🏼♂️
Attempt 1 to temporarily fill LEC 26 with old guard failed as 2/3 elected reps took the interim seats. I argue this week was attempt 2 to get those seats filled with old guard, and any others would be a bonus.
IF (and that’s a big if, I get it) the senior/older retirement crowd is pushing for a TA1.1 that still improves retirement at the expense of QOL, pay and scope (what TA1 did - pitting senior vs junior), they have two deadlines approaching that make it difficult to forward another concessionary contract. The first deadline is 1 Mar, when LEC 26 elected reps take their permanent seats. The second deadline is when PM is replaced. Cancellation of Tuesday’s meeting effectively closed the door for the MEC to send TA1.1 to the pilot group before 1 Mar.
Tell me where I screwed up that math 🤷🏼♂️
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
I think the window for 50.1% might be almost completely shut. Recalls voted for this week would have to run for 30 days and if the votes were rushed, that would leave a little over a week the end of Feb for the MEC to vote and send TA1.1 to the pilot group…before the LEC 26 permanent reps take their seats 1 Mar.
Attempt 1 to temporarily fill LEC 26 with old guard failed as 2/3 elected reps took the interim seats. I argue this week was attempt 2 to get those seats filled with old guard, and any others would be a bonus.
IF (and that’s a big if, I get it) the senior/older retirement crowd is pushing for a TA1.1 that still improves retirement at the expense of QOL, pay and scope (what TA1 did - pitting senior vs junior), they have two deadlines approaching that make it difficult to forward another concessionary contract. The first deadline is 1 Mar, when LEC 26 elected reps take their permanent seats. The second deadline is when PM is replaced. Cancellation of Tuesday’s meeting effectively closed the door for the MEC to send TA1.1 to the pilot group before 1 Mar.
Tell me where I screwed up that math 🤷🏼♂️
Attempt 1 to temporarily fill LEC 26 with old guard failed as 2/3 elected reps took the interim seats. I argue this week was attempt 2 to get those seats filled with old guard, and any others would be a bonus.
IF (and that’s a big if, I get it) the senior/older retirement crowd is pushing for a TA1.1 that still improves retirement at the expense of QOL, pay and scope (what TA1 did - pitting senior vs junior), they have two deadlines approaching that make it difficult to forward another concessionary contract. The first deadline is 1 Mar, when LEC 26 elected reps take their permanent seats. The second deadline is when PM is replaced. Cancellation of Tuesday’s meeting effectively closed the door for the MEC to send TA1.1 to the pilot group before 1 Mar.
Tell me where I screwed up that math 🤷🏼♂️
#26
You're correct. However we should not be surprised to see more antics from the Silent Majority Bitter Minority crowd. It appears that they have weaponized the company's legal department and put at least 5 pilots on NOQ so far from what I've found. As we've already seen by their creation and interrim-rep interference, they are not going to go down easily, nor quietly.
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Not sure how exactly I can expand otherwise I would. Contact your block rep for more info, just expect a biased answer if they are one of the block reps in the SM.
#30
Thanks for answering.
I knew it was over 1,000. But 7,000 WB credit hours - amazingly dropping into Open Time the very day that our new concessionary CBA was to take effect. That is just such an insane coincidence!
Remember the old distractions and disinformation, as pats ramp up the fear and uncertainty necessary for 50%+1 on TA 1.1 - due before the end of the April bid month.
I knew it was over 1,000. But 7,000 WB credit hours - amazingly dropping into Open Time the very day that our new concessionary CBA was to take effect. That is just such an insane coincidence!
Remember the old distractions and disinformation, as pats ramp up the fear and uncertainty necessary for 50%+1 on TA 1.1 - due before the end of the April bid month.
And the very next month they were in the bidpack.
From the assertions, pretty odd not to see a pretty hefty cancellation fee hit the books\streets.
Or maybe our Wet Lease contracts are just like our hotel contracts, we reserve the right to cancel them with 24 hours advance notice at no cost to us
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



