![]() |
Originally Posted by Pilotguy21
(Post 3848545)
I'm less concerned about being fair down to the dollar. More concerned about who votes yes vs no. Can't find many ages who would vote no and that's why I'm surprised it hasn't been thrown around much.
|
Originally Posted by UnusualAttitude
(Post 3848437)
Can they just lump sum contribute into your 401k beyond traditional IRS limits? Legitimate question. Not sure that is possible.
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3848438)
Con: Big tax hit immediately, you can't just dump all of that into a 401k, pre-tax IRA, or even a Roth. Annual contribution limits would apply and also taxes.
Need to get more creative on the distribution. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3848438)
Con: Big tax hit immediately, you can't just dump all of that into a 401k, pre-tax IRA, or even a Roth. Annual contribution limits would apply and also taxes.
Need to get more creative on the distribution. |
Originally Posted by Viper25
(Post 3848560)
During legacy bankruptcies, it was negotiated with the IRS to deposit one-time lump sums into 401Ks way over the standard limits.
|
Originally Posted by FXLAX
(Post 3848549)
The previous NC introduced a concept to convert the current accrued benefit in the Pension plan as a pre-funded lump sum balance in the MBCBP. So maybe it can be done?
Everyone should try reading the NC message from today. That seems like a much better idea than what is being floated here. |
Originally Posted by Viper25
(Post 3848560)
During legacy bankruptcies, it was negotiated with the IRS to deposit one-time lump sums into 401Ks way over the standard limits.
|
Originally Posted by Pilotguy21
(Post 3848545)
I'm less concerned about being fair down to the dollar. More concerned about who votes yes vs no. Can't find many ages who would vote no and that's why I'm surprised it hasn't been thrown around much.
Maybe your intention is to torpedo the NC! |
Originally Posted by JustInFacts
(Post 3848567)
Please provide the reference you are talking about. The NC presented a TA that did not include that. There is also a difference in changing defined benefit plans, which the MBCBP is/was and terminating the DB plan and converting it to a DC plan.
Everyone should try reading the NC message from today. That seems like a much better idea than what is being floated here. |
Originally Posted by JustInFacts
(Post 3848569)
So you don't care if it is fair, then why not let the junior guy take the hit. Maybe it isn't being thrown around because it isn't feasible the way you envision it. Why not ask the people involved? Wouldn't they have the answers over random anonymous people on the internet?
Maybe your intention is to torpedo the NC! |
Originally Posted by JustInFacts
(Post 3848565)
Which legacy and what was the amount. Any supporting documentation, or just a memory?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:29 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands