![]() |
Originally Posted by Uninteresting
(Post 3918170)
again, different business model.
|
Originally Posted by Tuck
(Post 3917825)
This current MEC did a lot to break this union - don't let them off the hook. Between TC and TC we have two of the worst MEC members in ALPA history.
The company would never outsource our jobs, right? SMH |
At this point do you guys think the majority of the pilot group (51+%) just wish they voted yes for TA2023? After 2 years of still not having a contract do you believe the next TA will be much better than the previous? What was the big hold back on TA2023? I have a friend interested in FedEx and was just curious. I hope you guys get a great new contract you deserve and hopefully soon.
|
Originally Posted by ROTORGUY
(Post 3918349)
At this point do you guys think the majority of the pilot group (51+%) just wish they voted yes for TA2023? After 2 years of still not having a contract do you believe the next TA will be much better than the previous? What was the big hold back on TA2023? I have a friend interested in FedEx and was just curious. I hope you guys get a great new contract you deserve and hopefully soon.
|
Originally Posted by ROTORGUY
(Post 3918349)
At this point do you guys think the majority of the pilot group (51+%) just wish they voted yes for TA2023? After 2 years of still not having a contract do you believe the next TA will be much better than the previous? What was the big hold back on TA2023? I have a friend interested in FedEx and was just curious. I hope you guys get a great new contract you deserve and hopefully soon.
Originally Posted by Sled
(Post 3918365)
Probably not. Anecdotally I’ve heard several say that they regret voting no. The difficult dynamic we’re working with is that many of the folks close to retirement would like an increase to the pension (obviously), while many of the younger pilots are concerned about work rules and scope (which is quite reasonable from their point of view). At this point the voting structure probably favors the younger pilots, as we’ve had ~400-500 retirements since TA2023, and about the same number of pilots get off of probation and become eligible to vote on a TA. My crystal ball says if they ran the vote today with TA2023 as written, but updated pay rates it would probably fail (again).
|
Originally Posted by FedUpWilson318
(Post 3918394)
Agree with Sled...and I would vote no again on TA1 even if I knew back then we'd be where we are today. Certainly nobody predicted the dumpster fire that some of the new MEC would bring, nor the self-inflicted wounds. But I'd rather be here with the POSSIBILITY of at least an industry AVERAGE TA2, than working under the CBA that TA1 offered. Now if only the the pilot group would actually start acting like a union.
|
Originally Posted by Pilotguy21
(Post 3918445)
buy everyone out of the pension and eliminate it. That’s the only way to unite young and old
|
Originally Posted by Pilotguy21
(Post 3918445)
buy everyone out of the pension and eliminate it. That’s the only way to unite young and old
|
Originally Posted by Stan446
(Post 3918500)
Yes, Give in. The pension pays almost $190K/yr if you go to 65. Your spouse gets half for life, yep, lets give that up.
o and we get a unified pilot group focused on QOL and pay scales only for every negotiation cycle for the next 30 years… |
Originally Posted by Pilotguy21
(Post 3918505)
6 million in a 401K making 3.5% a year gets you 210K a year…then your spouse gets 210K a year for life after you go…then your kids and grand kids and great grandkids get the entire thing after you both die…
o and we get a unified pilot group focused on QOL and pay scales only for every negotiation cycle for the next 30 years… l |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:59 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands