![]() |
Originally Posted by Pilotguy21
(Post 3931746)
The contract would be 20,000 pages if we had airtight language on every section. It’s not possible.
To solve that we need a level of trust that both sides will adhere to the negotiated intent. So what is that intent? Well for forever it has been unspoken and hasn’t been abused and it’s worked. Until the last 3 years. Leave 4a2c language in place and draft up a 1 page memorandum of intent clearly laying out the purpose of it, when it can be implemented and more importantly when it cannot. And for the love of god write down the exact formula of the SAM and put in on paper with signatures. Don’t be so press to get rid of a pension plan many of us would like to keep. We just want it improved just as you want the language in 4a2c improved. |
Originally Posted by StarClipper
(Post 3931849)
I love how delicate you are in this post to keep 4A2C. I take it you’re junior and looking out for your best interest. May I suggest you put that same thought into our current pension plan. We all can win if we hang in there together.
Don’t be so press to get rid of a pension plan many of us would like to keep. We just want it improved just as you want the language in 4a2c improved. |
Originally Posted by Pilotguy21
(Post 3931876)
I’m all for getting rid of 4a2c. But I know that will never happen sooooo we need to play damage control with it. Open to ideas
|
Originally Posted by StarClipper
(Post 3931849)
Don’t be so press to get rid of a pension plan many of us would like to keep. We just want it improved just as you want the language in 4a2c improved.
|
Originally Posted by StarClipper
(Post 3931887)
In that case be just as open to improving the pension plan rather than sunsetting it because it’s obvious the majority still wants it.
|
Originally Posted by StarClipper
(Post 3931887)
In that case be just as open to improving the pension plan rather than sunsetting it because it’s obvious the majority still wants it.
|
I have never seen a group so willing to negotiate in public as the FedEx group.
Seriously. The company and their consultants read every single post. |
Originally Posted by zerozero
(Post 3932076)
I have never seen a group so willing to negotiate in public as the FedEx group.
Seriously. The company and their consultants read every single post. it’s a disaster of a culture. no one can come together, no one knows how, every union leader is awful or has their own agenda or there is some conspiracy behind everything that they do or happens at the union. it’s old vs young, mil vs civilian, pension vs no pension, pax vs cargo, anti union vs unionists, draft fliers vs fly the line guys, company apologists vs non company men, it goes on and on. you’d think this place would have been through 100 mergers, much like American, with how screwed up the culture is. all this energy is focused on each other, all while being leap frogged by other airlines. unfortunately, culture doesn’t change overnight, and it doesn’t seem like anyone really wants to look in the mirror and even inch their way in that direction. it’s a sad, sad example of how a union shouldn’t function. it’s gonna be the same for years until the ship gets turned. don’t see that happening anytime soon. sigmund frog |
Company did a great job finding independent contractors and I want mine now pilots. Must have hired Sigmund Frogs grand father the great Freud to filter and hire the groups you described.
|
Originally Posted by max8222
(Post 3932092)
Company did a great job finding independent contractors and I want mine now pilots. Must have hired Sigmund Frogs grand father the great Freud to filter and hire the groups you described.
exhibit A folks. and yeah…hiring has always been awful here. now that the big secret is out (you know..the contract, culture, etc., is garbage), I’m willing to bet all the best will be beating on the doors at purple to fly a heavy once they spool up hiring again! Freud frog |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:23 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands