Search

Notices

TA???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-2026 | 03:06 PM
  #61  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2026
Posts: 41
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by tommyuriell
A contract can say anything until it is adjudicated in court. Law states a pilot recieving benefits prior to amendable date will have no changes to pension. Any pilot actively flying between amendable date and date of signing will get new pension increase.

Class action lawsuit with plantiffs ALPA and FEDEX coming. Many top labor law firms would jump on this. Would never get to a court room and would be settled fast.
Not going to happen
Reply
Old 04-09-2026 | 03:09 PM
  #62  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 149
Default

Originally Posted by airplanes
Despite what all these Delta bros say, congrats FedEx on a good pay increase after a long battle with a company hell bent on cost control and shrinking its business model. Very different environment than the last round of legacy contracts
it’s a TA. The pilots don’t have anything yet.
Reply
Old 04-09-2026 | 03:32 PM
  #63  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 6
Likes: 4
Default retro pay

FEDEX pilots compute flight pay from Nov 21 to date of signing. Multipy by 40%.....That is your retro active compensation up to DOS....by law... $150,000 is a bit short. A senior Capt would lose close to $350000... Todays labor consultants use the tactic delay delay delay..To the point pilots get fed up and except lower precidents in contract standards.

56 months past amendable date? Next contract will be the same or longer...

Now adjust inflation in the numbers, value of a dollar from 56 months ago? ouch
Reply
Old 04-09-2026 | 09:29 PM
  #64  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2026
Posts: 41
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by tommyuriell
FEDEX pilots compute flight pay from Nov 21 to date of signing. Multipy by 40%.....That is your retro active compensation up to DOS....by law... $150,000 is a bit short. A senior Capt would lose close to $350000... Todays labor consultants use the tactic delay delay delay..To the point pilots get fed up and except lower precidents in contract standards.

56 months past amendable date? Next contract will be the same or longer...

Now adjust inflation in the numbers, value of a dollar from 56 months ago? ouch
There is no retro active pay "by law", its what is agreed to in the TA. And so the company delayed and delayed, No S##$%. And FX pilots did nothing to get the company to come to the table. If a TA suddenly happened, something is going on with the company that THEY need a TA.
Reply
Old 04-09-2026 | 11:36 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,511
Likes: 112
Default

Originally Posted by tommyuriell;[url=tel:4021613
4021613]FEDEX pilots compute flight pay from Nov 21 to date of signing. Multipy by 40%.....That is your retro active compensation up to DOS....by law... $150,000 is a bit short. A senior Capt would lose close to $350000... Todays labor consultants use the tactic delay delay delay..To the point pilots get fed up and except lower precidents in contract standards.

56 months past amendable date? Next contract will be the same or longer...

Now adjust inflation in the numbers, value of a dollar from 56 months ago? ouch
Thats why it’s called an signing bonus, and not retro pay.


Originally Posted by Petey7788
There is no retro active pay "by law", its what is agreed to in the TA. And so the company delayed and delayed, No S##$%. And FX pilots did nothing to get the company to come to the table. If a TA suddenly happened, something is going on with the company that THEY need a TA.
From my buddies at FX, and listening to them the last few years, this isn’t entirely true. There were a lot of pilots willing to put the screws to the company, but that was all washed out by the epidemic of w4ores who were willing to pick up anything and everything at even straight pay to line their own pockets (at significantly lower rates than the pax carriers.)
Reply
Old 04-10-2026 | 12:47 AM
  #66  
FDX1's Avatar
Contract 2021
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 453
Likes: 4
From: 777 - Both
Default Is this you Tommy T?

Originally Posted by tommyuriell
A contract can say anything until it is adjudicated in court. Law states a pilot recieving benefits prior to amendable date will have no changes to pension. Any pilot actively flying between amendable date and date of signing will get new pension increase.

Class action lawsuit with plantiffs ALPA and FEDEX coming. Many top labor law firms would jump on this. Would never get to a court room and would be settled fast.
Unfortunately Tom, you are incorrect. The RLA (Federal Labor Law established the Railway Labor Act) and covers employees under a class and craft paradigm. Those employees are covered while they are actively employed and does not reach beyond that legal line. In other words, a Union (ALPA, SWAPA, etc), cannot be “compelled” to bargain for any future or past employee because by definition they are no longer a member of the class and craft.

This has been upheld numerous times in Federal Court (feel free to look it up). It would be great if FDX had offered to cover those pilots who unfortunately retired before April 8,2026. But this isn’t the case. Wish it were different but there isn’t a statutory requirement to cover you outside of the CBA.

Save your money on the lawyer and enjoy retirement…sincerely.
Reply
Old 04-10-2026 | 04:50 AM
  #67  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 6
Likes: 4
Default

I agree with you on RLA being somewhat general in scope. Under RLA contracts do not expire they become "amedable" When a new contract is agreed to all changes revert back to amendable date (pay,work rules ,benefits) Any FEDEX pilot receiving flight pay after NOV21 up to DOS is entitled to retro active pay.

FEDEX MEC in previous negotiations wanted a "bonus" vs full flight pay retro in order not to reward a few members flying overtime. Understandable at the time however future negative aspects of that are obvious. 56 months of sec 6 is like skipping an entire contract, then getting a fraction of lost flight pay.

On pilots who retired after NOV21 to DOS they were on property and are entitled to benefit changes. Not negotiating for future pilots hired after DOS? MEC just did that with retirement. No more DB option for them..

American APA in 1983 agreed to a 17 year B scale for new hires. They could get A scale early with a captain bid, but B scale retirement was forever. 1991 B scale pilots sued American over retirement. It was settled fast and never went to court. Management knew it was not legal. All APA pilots on same retirement benefit plan.

Anytime a labor dispute ends up in court "legal precident" or case history on judicial rulings is used not RLA..

Statments on NOT being CBA for future pilots or retired pilots on property after NOV21...The old saying goes "WE ARE IN THE LIFEBOAT,PULL IN THE LADDER"
Reply
Old 04-10-2026 | 05:45 AM
  #68  
NuGuy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 86
Default

Originally Posted by JustInFacts
Can you prove this statement, I'd like to see the math comparing the required company contributions to fund the DB plan along with a capped 9% DC plan and a cash over cap 18% going to 19% DC plan over a 25, 30 and 30+ year career.
This can be a wild number to try to pin down, because the cost and/or valuation of a DB plan can swing wildly with about 5 different variables, including age, interest rates, valuation of the plan assets and so on.

With a healthy plan, run by someone who knows what they're doing, with good diversification of assets that experience modest gains, with a "normal" stable long term interest of around %5, DB plans are self funding, costing only administrative fees and marginal capital infusions for additional employees with a reasonable demographic spread.

Change any of those variables, and it can get on the wrong side of any number of lines, requiring contributions from the sponsor. Those contributions can be surprisingly high with marginal changes in the conditions, because the changes can be exponentially bad.

That said, under the above conditions, a DC of %18, with cash over the cap, for a younger pilot (say, <35), the DC money is probably bordering on being more expensive, all in, than a equivalent DB benefit. When DBs are self funding, the contribution requirements, if required at all, are very modest, and are usually made once per year. DC money, OTOH, represents real money that has to be paid out every two weeks. When interest rates ran back to their normal levels a few years ago, there was chatter in the corporate benefit world that maybe DC wasn't the way to go, and DB plans actually represent a savings and better capital management.

Then interest rates got all wonky again, and that idea went out the window.

Reply
Old 04-10-2026 | 06:18 AM
  #69  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 695
Likes: 54
Default

Originally Posted by tommyuriell
I agree with you on RLA being somewhat general in scope. Under RLA contracts do not expire they become "amedable" When a new contract is agreed to all changes revert back to amendable date (pay,work rules ,benefits) Any FEDEX pilot receiving flight pay after NOV21 up to DOS is entitled to retro active pay.

FEDEX MEC in previous negotiations wanted a "bonus" vs full flight pay retro in order not to reward a few members flying overtime. Understandable at the time however future negative aspects of that are obvious. 56 months of sec 6 is like skipping an entire contract, then getting a fraction of lost flight pay.

On pilots who retired after NOV21 to DOS they were on property and are entitled to benefit changes. Not negotiating for future pilots hired after DOS? MEC just did that with retirement. No more DB option for them..

American APA in 1983 agreed to a 17 year B scale for new hires. They could get A scale early with a captain bid, but B scale retirement was forever. 1991 B scale pilots sued American over retirement. It was settled fast and never went to court. Management knew it was not legal. All APA pilots on same retirement benefit plan.

Anytime a labor dispute ends up in court "legal precident" or case history on judicial rulings is used not RLA..

Statments on NOT being CBA for future pilots or retired pilots on property after NOV21...The old saying goes "WE ARE IN THE LIFEBOAT,PULL IN THE LADDER"
You say you were a Delta pilot for 32 years. Why weren't you complaining that Delta didn't get 18% of their 2020, 2021 and 2022 pay? Why didn't retirees at Delta in December 2022 get their 2020, 2021 and 2022 DC contributions changed from 15% to 18% if all benefits in the contract go back to the amendable date? Maybe it has to do with the fact that there are effective dates tied to those pay rates and benefits.

Sorry that after 32 years at Delta you have nothing better to do with your time than to post false information on the Fedex board. If what you say is law really was law the way you describe it, then it wouldn't have to be negotiated.
Reply
Old 04-10-2026 | 07:31 AM
  #70  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 6
Likes: 4
Default COMPLAINING?

You Have no clue......Chapter 11 2008 60% final avg earnings for retirement with full medical.......to 15% DC end up with 20 cents on the dollar from what you were under contract previously. May have been some complaining.

A DC plan works well for a new hire with 30 years to go. No worries about any future chap 11 because money is in your name. 2008 long time retired DAL took huge hits in retirement pay and lost med.

Pay and benefits to amendable date or not? If not then retro bonus/pay would be zero..

Why post here? Have tons of Guard friends flying and retired with FEDEX. ALPA pilots support ALPA pilots regardless of whatever airline they fly for.. Seen tons of contracts,mergers and chap 11 when contract pay and retirement is devistated.

Lots of things to complain about!
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices