Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
Augmented Duty Periods 767 w/No Rest Area >

Augmented Duty Periods 767 w/No Rest Area

Search
Notices

Augmented Duty Periods 767 w/No Rest Area

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-09-2015, 05:16 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 296
Default

I would think the future will have the 76 flying to both Asia and Europe, then crews flying 75's inter Asia and Europe and then flying home. The 11 will be used on segments where the 76 can't haul enough. The 11 does over 8hrs now with just the dog pad, aka, futon.
Viper446 is offline  
Old 09-09-2015, 05:42 PM
  #12  
Part Time Employee
 
MaxKts's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Default

Originally Posted by Viper446 View Post
I would think the future will have the 76 flying to both Asia and Europe, then crews flying 75's inter Asia and Europe and then flying home. The 11 will be used on segments where the 76 can't haul enough. The 11 does over 8hrs now with just the dog pad, aka, futon.
Yes, but in the 11 you can get out of the cockpit and stretch out to rest!
MaxKts is offline  
Old 09-09-2015, 05:46 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 296
Default

Right. And did anyone think the company would ever let the 76 go over 8hrs? The company line when the 11 was bought was the same issue, it wouldn't need a crew rest area. Now it does and the one on the airplane sucks. The 76 in my opinion, is going to be flying across the Atlantic once enough airframes are on the property. And look for the 777 flying ULR with 5 guys and doing two stops.
Viper446 is offline  
Old 09-09-2015, 05:58 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CloudSailor's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,055
Default

Originally Posted by Viper446 View Post
...the 76 in my opinion, is going to be flying across the Atlantic once enough airframes are on the property. And look for the 777 flying ULR with 5 guys and doing two stops.
Yep!

Exactly the concern with the company's gained efficiencies in 18hr final deviation checkin, giving up 1st class for lie-flat seats, HILO, etc... The company knows where we system form will be going with these airplanes, we don't. They have gained efficiencies in the TA that feel small now, but will dominate our international flying not too long from now.
CloudSailor is online now  
Old 09-09-2015, 07:59 PM
  #15  
Just happy to be here
 
Fartknocker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: 777 FO
Posts: 163
Default

Originally Posted by Viper446 View Post
And look for the 777 flying ULR with 5 guys and doing two stops.
I believe that is incorrect.

Sec 12 E.2. of the TA limits the Number of Landings in a Duty Period with a ULR Flight Segment to 1.
Fartknocker is offline  
Old 09-09-2015, 08:18 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Crewmember
Posts: 1,377
Default

Yes, but you only get paid ULR rates based on scheduled block.

So, if you are scheduled to block 15:55, and you actually block 16:30, no money for you!

I thought ALPA had all the smart lawyers, and ALPA was going to "tighten up the language"?

How much you want to bet someone will block over 16 hours and not get paid ULR rates?

How much you want to bet the company already knows how they are going to exploit this?

Why didn't "our" NC put the word "actual" in the language?

More "hidden money" we will never see!
Nightflyer is offline  
Old 09-09-2015, 09:07 PM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Bill Kilgore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: Huey Gunship
Posts: 64
Default

Originally Posted by Nightflyer View Post

How much you want to bet someone will block over 16 hours and not get paid ULR rates?
About as often as they block less than 16 hours and do get paid . . .

Same as RFO rules, sometimes you get one when actual block is less than 7:35, sometimes you don't when you block 7:36.
Bill Kilgore is offline  
Old 09-09-2015, 09:58 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PurpleToolBox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,622
Default

Originally Posted by Viper446 View Post
Right. And did anyone think the company would ever let the 76 go over 8hrs? The company line when the 11 was bought was the same issue, it wouldn't need a crew rest area. Now it does and the one on the airplane sucks. The 76 in my opinion, is going to be flying across the Atlantic once enough airframes are on the property. And look for the 777 flying ULR with 5 guys and doing two stops.
We as a pilot group need to understand that the 757 is going to replace ~12 wide body aircraft over the next couple of years. There is going to be a significant decrease in the number of wide body positions.
PurpleToolBox is offline  
Old 09-10-2015, 05:43 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

So is the new language better or worse than the old language. If we vote no how do lines improve?
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 09-10-2015, 10:55 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PurpleToolBox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,622
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleToolBox View Post
We as a pilot group need to understand that the 757 is going to replace ~12 wide body aircraft over the next couple of years. There is going to be a significant decrease in the number of wide body positions.
This is the range of a 757F with 60,000lbs of cargo. And with airlines dumping 757s, there will be plenty to buy.

PurpleToolBox is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
av8n
Part 135
71
04-05-2016 11:40 AM
DC8DRIVER
Atlas/Polar
21
03-24-2015 03:17 PM
Beech1900bush
Regional
0
03-15-2007 08:54 PM
CubCAPTAIN
Regional
94
02-17-2007 09:37 PM
Freight Dog
Cargo
2
07-04-2006 05:58 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices