FDX 777 fire divert RJTT?
11-21-2015, 01:43 PM
#1
The NeverEnding Story
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,512
FDX 777 fire divert RJTT?
Saw that a FedEx 777 flying PVG-MEM diverted into Tokyo due to a fire indication. Online info is conflicting - some say there was no fire found, others say cargo was removed and the source of fire was found inside a container.
Any details?
Any details?
11-21-2015, 03:20 PM
#2
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: On Food Stamps
Posts: 937
11-21-2015, 07:47 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Posts: 166
"While we do not yet know the cause of this incident, we do know that there were no declared dangerous goods on board the aircraft."
Interesting -- I may be wrong of course, but I thought dangerous goods were not allowed on flights originating from mainland China. Makes me wonder who in flight management would even declare such a statement.
So relieved they got it on the ground when they did.
Interesting -- I may be wrong of course, but I thought dangerous goods were not allowed on flights originating from mainland China. Makes me wonder who in flight management would even declare such a statement.
So relieved they got it on the ground when they did.
11-21-2015, 08:12 PM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Originally Posted by Kipper
"While we do not yet know the cause of this incident, we do know that there were no declared dangerous goods on board the aircraft."
Interesting -- I may be wrong of course, but I thought dangerous goods were not allowed on flights originating from mainland China. Makes me wonder who in flight management would even declare such a statement.
So relieved they got it on the ground when they did.
Interesting -- I may be wrong of course, but I thought dangerous goods were not allowed on flights originating from mainland China. Makes me wonder who in flight management would even declare such a statement.
So relieved they got it on the ground when they did.
11-22-2015, 02:38 PM
#8
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 48
Originally Posted by Kipper
"While we do not yet know the cause of this incident, we do know that there were no declared dangerous goods on board the aircraft."
Interesting -- I may be wrong of course, but I thought dangerous goods were not allowed on flights originating from mainland China. Makes me wonder who in flight management would even declare such a statement.
So relieved they got it on the ground when they did.
Interesting -- I may be wrong of course, but I thought dangerous goods were not allowed on flights originating from mainland China. Makes me wonder who in flight management would even declare such a statement.
So relieved they got it on the ground when they did.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
