Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   FedEx (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/fedex/)
-   -   A300 vs. B757 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/fedex/93716-a300-vs-b757.html)

busdriver12 03-05-2016 08:06 AM

[QUOTE=PostalAV8B;2082037] Also looking at the 300 bid pack and the reserve lines this month...With the new class that just started I almost have enough below that I may be able to hold a line by summer. A crappy line, but a line. Movement looks like it will be fast. Of course with the upcoming bid, it all could change.

[QUOTE]

Look, you probably know this, but all you need is a line. Trip trade your butt off, swap for the sick time, and you can make your line a whole lot better. I've seen extremely junior bus pilots end up with beautiful months, just because they were willing to do the work. Not worth it for some, but definitely for others.

MaydayMark 03-05-2016 11:25 AM

And don't forget ... they're getting rid of all of the A300's three years ago!*?


:confused:

MacGuy2 03-05-2016 11:50 AM


Originally Posted by ARAMP1 (Post 2082684)
Heck man, now is the time to do it if you're going to do it. $4K a month training pay vs first year pay isn't that much of a loss. Plus, you're already in the schoolhouse frame of mind. At least that's my thoughts anyway.

I would agree with Postal. I wouldn't want to play "you bet your job" any more often than I had to in my first year.

MG2

Adlerdriver 03-05-2016 12:40 PM


Originally Posted by MacGuy2 (Post 2082842)
I would agree with Postal. I wouldn't want to play "you bet your job" any more often than I had to in my first year.

MG2

:rolleyes: A little dramatic, IMO.

When was the last time a competent professional hired by FedEx didn't make it through initial new hire training because they simply couldn't hack it? I'm not talking about the problem child from UPS with a bad attitude or some other person with undetected baggage or training issues. I'm talking a well qualified pilot with a solid work history coming out of the military, ACMI, corporate, an RJ or some other route here.

If someone struggles for some reason as a new hire and lacks the confidence to make it through another course, fine. Stay in the shallow end until you have the full protections of the CBA (and maybe do something to strengthen your skills). Don't they still have to pass recurrent a couple of time, though? Doesn't that carry as much jeopardy as the ride at the end of a transition course? I was going to mention line checks, but they're probably the ones who sick out of those. Thanks for the nice trip!! :D I guess it's good they know their own limitations (although weeding out a weak pilot before we HAVE to protect them might not be a bad idea.....but I digress).

To present avoidance of multiple training cycles in year one as a universal axiom that all should follow is misrepresenting reality. A good pilot who had no issues the first time around should not feel like they're "betting their job" if they train twice in their first year. Apply the same skill and effort to the next course and most likely similar results will follow. Have a bad day - bring it next time and move on. It's not a one mistake company and more than just one bad ride would have to occur before the extreme steps of showing them the door.

Radioactive 03-05-2016 12:53 PM


Originally Posted by Adlerdriver (Post 2082869)
:rolleyes: A little dramatic, IMO.

When was the last time a competent professional hired by FedEx didn't make it through initial new hire training because they simply couldn't hack it? I'm not talking about the problem child from UPS with a bad attitude or some other person with undetected baggage or training issues. I'm talking a well qualified pilot with a solid work history coming out of the military, ACMI, corporate, an RJ or some other route here.

If someone struggles for some reason as a new hire and lacks the confidence to make it through another course, fine. Stay in the shallow end until you have the full protections of the CBA (and maybe do something to strengthen your skills). Don't they still have to pass recurrent a couple of time, though? Doesn't that carry as much jeopardy as the ride at the end of a transition course? I was going to mention line checks, but they're probably the ones who sick out of those. Thanks for the nice trip!! :D I guess it's good they know their own limitations (although weeding out a weak pilot before we HAVE to protect them might not be a bad idea.....but I digress).

To present avoidance of multiple training cycles in year one as a universal axiom that all should follow is misrepresenting reality. A good pilot who had no issues the first time around should not feel like they're "betting their job" if they train twice in their first year. Apply the same skill and effort to the next course and most likely similar results will follow. Have a bad day - bring it next time and move on. It's not a one mistake company and more than just one bad ride would have to occur before the extreme steps of showing them the door.

You mean you had a newhire come from UPS? He must have been one of their furloughs. Did he have a bad attitude? Did he make it through probation for did he get fired?

Adlerdriver 03-05-2016 01:05 PM


Originally Posted by Radioactive (Post 2082876)
You mean you had a newhire come from UPS? He must have been one of their furloughs. Did he have a bad attitude? Did he make it through probation for did he get fired?

I think he was furloughed, but I'm not certain. From what I've heard, he had big attitude problems and shot himself in the foot multiple times before they showed him the door. No, he did not make it through probation. I don't think he even made it through new hire training.

Radioactive 03-05-2016 01:21 PM


Originally Posted by Adlerdriver (Post 2082885)
I think he was furloughed, but I'm not certain. From what I've heard, he had big attitude problems and shot himself in the foot multiple times before they showed him the door. No, he did not make it through probation. I don't think he even made it through new hire training.

Wow. What a bonehead. To get thrown a huge lifeline at FDX and screwing it up.

FDX28 03-05-2016 02:06 PM


Originally Posted by MaydayMark (Post 2082540)
Many (most?) of the used 757's we purchased had winglets and we took them off. At many of our out-stations the 757s were going to have to park in the same 727 parking spots and there was concern about wing tip clearance ...


:confused:

You sure about that? There's no STC to remove winglets - 757 or 767. The Silk Air 767 we bought that has winglets were added via STC but we're trying to figure out how to remove them as they have been cracking.

MX727 03-05-2016 03:05 PM


Originally Posted by Radioactive (Post 2081667)
But it's a Boeing. That alone should be worth something.

Yes, it's worth less.


Originally Posted by Radioactive (Post 2081972)
How come your 767s don't have winglets? Are you going to get them?

Who really cares. We don't get paid more for winglets and the pilots aren't paying for the fuel. Others have posted the negatives with respect to footprint, cost and ROI.


Originally Posted by Radioactive (Post 2082009)
Thanks. I think that UPS has them on all their 767s. Any plans to put them on your 757s?

Why are you seemingly obsessed with winglets of all things?

ARAMP1 03-05-2016 03:12 PM


Originally Posted by MacGuy2 (Post 2082842)
I would agree with Postal. I wouldn't want to play "you bet your job" any more often than I had to in my first year.

MG2

It's been my experience so far that, flying skills aside, if you put forth a little effort, the training department will make sure you make it through.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:35 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands