Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   FedEx (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/fedex/)
-   -   Chairman's message 5/23 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/fedex/95233-chairmans-message-5-23-a.html)

The Walrus 05-24-2016 03:51 PM

After being here 20 years, I don't trust this pilot force to vote for or against anything.

FDXLAG 05-24-2016 04:08 PM

Should we wait until 2021 before we inspect the company's books on the A Plan?

Nightflyer 05-24-2016 04:12 PM


Originally Posted by busdriver12 (Post 2134722)
This is a stand alone item. We're not in negotiations, we're not delaying raises or contract benefits. It will be easy for every single pilot to judge the merits of changing this. Why would we accept anything short of better than what we have? The company is prosperous, and there is no reason to accept anything except for improvements, so why would we do otherwise?

We are not in negotiations. Why should the company give us something better than we already have?

They can say "see you in 2021".

There is no reason for them to agree to an LOA unless it is to their advantage.

USMCFDX 05-24-2016 04:19 PM


Originally Posted by FDXLAG (Post 2134740)
Should we wait until 2021 before we inspect the company's books on the A Plan?

No we should have inspected them 5 years ago. Just another example of how dysfunctional we are. The last thing we should do is negotiate another POS LOA.

busdriver12 05-24-2016 04:41 PM


Originally Posted by Nightflyer (Post 2134744)
We are not in negotiations. Why should the company give us something better than we already have?

They can say "see you in 2021".

There is no reason for them to agree to an LOA unless it is to their advantage.

So if there is no reason for them to agree to a LOA unless it is to their advantage, and no reason for us to agree to an LOA unless it's also to our advantage...why would they think we'd even discuss it?

Unless they believe there is an option that benefits both sides, which potentially there could be. Our stagnant pension is worth less every year to us, yet costs them more every year. I would hope both the union and company could see a win/win scenario, otherwise it is a waste of time and money.

FDXLAG 05-24-2016 05:01 PM


Originally Posted by USMCFDX (Post 2134747)
No we should have inspected them 5 years ago. Just another example of how dysfunctional we are. The last thing we should do is negotiate another POS LOA.

I am with you, I said something similar in 2006 but I was assured our A Plan was overfunded nothing to see here move along. Now that they want a peak at the books we are outraged. OK.

BlackKnight 05-24-2016 05:33 PM


Originally Posted by busdriver12 (Post 2134722)
This is a stand alone item. We're not in negotiations, we're not delaying raises or contract benefits. It will be easy for every single pilot to judge the merits of changing this. Why would we accept anything short of better than what we have? The company is prosperous, and there is no reason to accept anything except for improvements, so why would we do otherwise?



Because we just did.

busdriver12 05-24-2016 07:14 PM


Originally Posted by BlackKnight (Post 2134784)
Because we just did.

Well, apparently 57% of pilots disagreed with you.

And out of the other 43%, I'd bet it would be hard to find one who thinks our new contract was actually worse than what we had. So far I have yet to experience one negative aspect of the contract, yet my paycheck looks a lot better. No doubt I'll come up with something negative, but from just one person's standpoint, the bad things I worried about have not been realized yet. I'm sure that we could have held out and done better, but I can't pretend that the new contract was actually worse.

MeXC 05-25-2016 03:50 AM

"You would have to come up with something that benefits both the old and young, so it is fair to both age groups. Don't screw the young to help the old, and don't do the reverse either."

Are we talking Age 65 or retirement? :)

PeterGriffin 05-25-2016 04:41 AM


Originally Posted by MeXC (Post 2134931)
"You would have to come up with something that benefits both the old and young, so it is fair to both age groups. Don't screw the young to help the old, and don't do the reverse either."

Are we talking Age 65 or retirement? :)

That is a huge question. Right now, you can get your "high five" and coast til 25 years of service and retire with full A fund retirement. Plus, people like the option of retiring a little early (58, 59) with minimal impact to A fund retirement. What formula are they gonna use? Working your tail off to 65 with a higher B fund??


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:16 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands