Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Foward slips to landing

Old 03-07-2007 | 01:04 AM
  #21  
Cubdriver's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
From: ATP, CFI etc.
Default

Well I don't think I was imagining 40 degree setting in the 172N that I took my instrument checkride in.

Here's something I surfed up:

"...not until the 1981 model year was the maximum flap extension reduced from 40 to 30 degrees."

http://search.netscape.com/ns/boomfr...2FA02P0136.asp

C172Ps were the last of the 1980's Skyhawks, and were introduced in 1981 according to wikipedia. So, my guess is that was where the 40 setting actually ended, when the P was introduced. I never found much use for the 40 degree setting as it slowed down touch n goes due to retraction time. I think they were for super-short field landings which no one does anymore, perhaps a sales gimmick. As far as I know they only only added drag which is of little value when forward slipping because that does it so much better.

Last edited by Cubdriver; 03-07-2007 at 07:09 AM.
Reply
Old 03-07-2007 | 09:25 AM
  #22  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,618
Likes: 557
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by VTcharter
in did. As for the tail stall being an old wives tale...turbulent airflow over an airfoil is the beginnings of a stall, and with a slow enough airspeed, or sudden change in relative wind, it would be very easy for a tail stall to develop.
Some airfoils exhibit buffeting prior to a stall, some do not (super-critical foils). But buffeting can also be caused by airflow patterns which have nothing to do with a stall...

Last edited by rickair7777; 03-07-2007 at 12:28 PM.
Reply
Old 03-07-2007 | 11:24 AM
  #23  
de727ups's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,357
Likes: 0
From: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Default

I looked up the TCDS for the 172N. I had a seaplane, so that's where I got the 30 degrees of flaps, from. The landplane did have 40 degrees. The P models and newer had 30 degrees.
Reply
Old 03-07-2007 | 02:54 PM
  #24  
Ewfflyer's Avatar
Flying Farmer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,160
Likes: 0
From: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Default

Originally Posted by de727ups
I looked up the TCDS for the 172N. I had a seaplane, so that's where I got the 30 degrees of flaps, from. The landplane did have 40 degrees. The P models and newer had 30 degrees.
There's also some places that put a strip of metal preventing flap extension past 30 degree's also. Not a bad idea really. Most training/rental pilots really don't need to be using it IMO. If you need that level of flap extention, you probably need to consider another approach or alternate.
Reply
Old 03-30-2007 | 07:39 AM
  #25  
jgg1211's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default One more thing...

There are also some models that want you to avoid prolonged slips due to fuel starvation.....good to know in my opinion!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
buffalopilot
Regional
12
02-27-2007 08:25 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
43
07-31-2006 06:46 AM
fireman0174
Major
1
02-08-2006 11:50 AM
Gordon C
JetBlue
5
10-06-2005 03:28 PM
SWAjet
Major
2
06-19-2005 07:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices