Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Type Rating Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2017, 11:21 AM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 28
Default Type Rating Question

A fellow pilot at the local airport mentioned something to me the other day and I cannot find any information confirming or denying that it is possible. He said that if you get your multi-engine add-on in a jet, then you will automatically get typed in it. So for example, say someone has 500 hours total time, 400 PIC, private pilot SEL with an instrument rating and high altitude endorsement. And lets say they do their multi-engine add-on training in a Citation I. After they complete their checkride, would they also get an unrestricted type rating in that aircraft?
Turd_Ferguson is offline  
Old 11-20-2017, 11:59 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: JAFO- First Observer
Posts: 997
Default

See 14 CFR 61.31. The applicant would also be required to have a high altitude endorsement. The applicant would have to pass a Private Pilot, Additional Rating, AMEL practical test. That test would include a CE-500 type rating, which will need to be performed to ATP (yes that is a fact) PTS Standards.
PerfInit is offline  
Old 11-20-2017, 12:37 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 834
Default

Generally speaking, with those ratings and flight time you would likely be so far behind the jet you wouldn't have to worry about getting hurt in the wreck.
Yoda2 is offline  
Old 11-20-2017, 01:03 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 28
Default

Originally Posted by Yoda2 View Post
Generally speaking, with those ratings and flight time you would likely be so far behind the jet you wouldn't have to worry about getting hurt in the wreck.
I agree. I was just using that as an example of a possibility if the pilot was actually capable of doing it.
Turd_Ferguson is offline  
Old 11-20-2017, 01:11 PM
  #5  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 28
Default

Originally Posted by PerfInit View Post
See 14 CFR 61.31. The applicant would also be required to have a high altitude endorsement. The applicant would have to pass a Private Pilot, Additional Rating, AMEL practical test. That test would include a CE-500 type rating, which will need to be performed to ATP (yes that is a fact) PTS Standards.
I've looked over 14 CFR 61.31 several times, but cannot find this particular situation described. Am I overlooking it?

In this situation, the pilot has a high altitude endorsement.
Turd_Ferguson is offline  
Old 11-20-2017, 01:54 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,177
Default

Originally Posted by Yoda2 View Post
Generally speaking, with those ratings and flight time you would likely be so far behind the jet you wouldn't have to worry about getting hurt in the wreck.
How did I do it in an F-100 in the weather? Depends on the training.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 11-20-2017, 01:58 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: JAFO- First Observer
Posts: 997
Default

Okay, spoon feeding one reg at a time. Check out 61.63
PerfInit is offline  
Old 11-20-2017, 02:36 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,730
Default

In order to be PIC in a jet you have to have a type rating in it. The way to think of it is if you get a type rating you will also get the class rating.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 11-20-2017, 02:48 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 834
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer View Post
How did I do it in an F-100 in the weather? Depends on the training.

GF
Of course it depends on the training, and the student. You also know Mil training is vastly different from civilian. I answered based on the Civilian POV.
Yoda2 is offline  
Old 11-20-2017, 09:15 PM
  #10  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 28
Default

Originally Posted by PerfInit View Post
Okay, spoon feeding one reg at a time. Check out 61.63
Thanks for "spoon feeding" me. It's easier to reference part of a reg when it's the correct reference, isn't it?
Turd_Ferguson is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CTOGUY
Corporate
7
03-13-2013 08:50 AM
32LTangoTen
Regional
61
12-06-2012 02:41 PM
gmcman30
Corporate
9
10-26-2010 03:01 PM
Mrsmith42e
Flight Schools and Training
5
05-10-2007 07:49 AM
surreal1221
Major
20
06-08-2006 02:43 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices