![]() |
Originally Posted by keiundraj
(Post 182110)
I didn't mean to offend you, I was serious, the 15day CFI school is taught by a guy who had a hand in writing every FAR you know and the AIM. Can recite Part, Subpart, Section, page number of every Reg off the top of his head.
Secondly, who cares if he's memorized the FAR? All that means is that he's got too much time on his hands - NOT that he's a better pilot for it. |
I had a couple of co-workers who went to ATP for the CFI, they both said that they wished it had been more like how we train here (university 141). They had to learn everything before going, then got no advice on teaching. So they had to really bite the bullet their first semesters of instructing. In contrast, the university's program involves teaching every ground subject. We don't get lectured, we're expected to teach the subject and then get pointers on dealing with students.
|
If you're at UND, then, I'd also agree they turn out a great CFI.
I once did a 152 checkout with a UND guy who, I swear, must have never flown a Cessna before. He was all over the place. But, from the beginning of the "interview", it was plain that he was well prepared as a CFI. Much better than an ATP or FBO CFI would be. At the same time, it's still a license to learn. You can go from min standards to a pretty good CFI in 200 hours. It's just sad that, at ATP, about the time you get competent, you're long gone for the regionals while leaving it up to the 90 day wonder to step up. Of course, this is the stated intent of ATP, to get you to a regional at min time no matter what and at any cost. |
does anyone know about ATP's saftey record? ...just curious
|
Originally Posted by POPA
(Post 182264)
Firstly, I have serious doubts this guy's been with the FAA long enough to have been involved with every reg there is.
Secondly, who cares if he's memorized the FAR? All that means is that he's got too much time on his hands - NOT that he's a better pilot for it.
Originally Posted by Low & Slow
(Post 182235)
No but they can judge a school based on the impression their students make on the general public.
If I were managing ATP I would pay you to stay away from Internet pilot forums. Seriously, after reading some of your posts you're fueling the impression that many people have that ATP will train anyone with a checkbook - brain optional. That IS callous, but please ask yourself what you have to prove on an anonymous forum, and why you're posting here. You've squandered any chance of getting genuine and thoughtful advice from those who are working in the airline industry. Why are you here?
Originally Posted by de727ups
(Post 182276)
If you're at UND, then, I'd also agree they turn out a great CFI.
I once did a 152 checkout with a UND guy who, I swear, must have never flown a Cessna before. He was all over the place. But, from the beginning of the "interview", it was plain that he was well prepared as a CFI. Much better than an ATP or FBO CFI would be. At the same time, it's still a license to learn. You can go from min standards to a pretty good CFI in 200 hours. It's just sad that, at ATP, about the time you get competent, you're long gone for the regionals while leaving it up to the 90 day wonder to step up. Of course, this is the stated intent of ATP, to get you to a regional at min time no matter what and at any cost.
Originally Posted by determined2fly
(Post 182303)
does anyone know about ATP's saftey record? ...just curious
|
Originally Posted by keiundraj
(Post 182326)
It's ok to doubt but it's true.
The FAA was created in 1958. If this instructor you speak of has been involved in writing regulations since the birth of the FAA, that would mean he's had almost a 50-year career thus far. Of course, we all know that the FAA was pre-dated by the CAA - and so were some of the laws under which we now fly. The CAA was split from the CAB in 1940, which means that your man would have had a 60+ career thus far (at an absolute minimum). Just how old is this guy, hm? |
The typical FAR book published by ASA gets 25 pages thicker every year, on average.
As far as pilot mill CFIs...a flight school I previously instructed at wouldn't hire any wet-ticket CFIs from Comair Academy, FSI, or ATP due to previous bad experiences. I was witness to the interview that caused this policy - I have never seen somebody hold a pilot certificate that was so wholly unprepared and uneducated as to the tasks and responsibilities of the job they were interviewing before. Not saying that all folks that come from those schools can't teach, but its not out of line to say that schools like that aren't there to teach you how to teach, they're there to get you a certificate, and ultimately, an airline job. FWIW, I might have attended Purdue but I did all my CFI tickets through an FBO twice as fast and half the price of any university program. I taught at Purdue and elsewhere 61 and also was a 141 check instructor at the aforementioned flight school. I challenge anybody to tell me that my instruction was inferior to someone else's simply because of where they learned. |
Originally Posted by de727ups
(Post 182276)
If you're at UND, then, I'd also agree they turn out a great CFI.
I once did a 152 checkout with a UND guy who, I swear, must have never flown a Cessna before. He was all over the place. But, from the beginning of the "interview", it was plain that he was well prepared as a CFI. Much better than an ATP or FBO CFI would be. At the same time, it's still a license to learn. You can go from min standards to a pretty good CFI in 200 hours. It's just sad that, at ATP, about the time you get competent, you're long gone for the regionals while leaving it up to the 90 day wonder to step up. Of course, this is the stated intent of ATP, to get you to a regional at min time no matter what and at any cost. |
Originally Posted by de727ups
(Post 182173)
"don't listen to this MESS on this Forum!"
N6724G. ATP will not make you a great CFI. No place can. I actually recommend ATP for the CFI's as they do a lot of them and know how to get people through it. But, you need to have your act together before you go and have a good background before you get there. You can't really be "taught" how to be a good CFI. I think all the CFI schools put out a minimum standards product (except for maybe FSA). That's no big deal as long as you don't turn around and jump into teaching guys who are gonna be airline pilots in six months. But, if you get the certificate, and kinda ease into instructing, especially with some high time mentors to help you, you'll be fine. The only way to be a great CFI is to do a lot of it and gain experience. You were lucky to learn, so far, from high time CFI's. You got that going for ya. What youth aviation stuff are you doin? I think you canbe taugt to be a good CFI. Learning the fundamentals of teaching (levels of learning, principles of learning, Evaluating students, developng lesson plans) These are skills that need to be taught. You just cant just jump in their and start teaching. Youhave to understand human behavior and that people learn at different rates and at different levels. Its not as easy as passing an FOI 60 question test |
Originally Posted by N6724G
(Post 182653)
I work with CAP cadets, a organizationcalled ACE and OBAP summer camps.
I think you canbe taugt to be a good CFI. Learning the fundamentals of teaching (levels of learning, principles of learning, Evaluating students, developng lesson plans) These are skills that need to be taught. You just cant just jump in their and start teaching. Youhave to understand human behavior and that people learn at different rates and at different levels. Its not as easy as passing an FOI 60 question test |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:38 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands