Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
VOR Reciever question on Cessna 172SP >

VOR Reciever question on Cessna 172SP


Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

VOR Reciever question on Cessna 172SP

Old 05-21-2008 | 02:27 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From: Cessna 150 Left seat
Default VOR Reciever question on Cessna 172SP

I was in 2003 Cesnna 172SP today. Like most 172SP's i've experienced, it has bandix/king gps/comm/nav system.
I shot an ILS yesterday using NAV 1 and it was fine. However upon trying to be established on a Localizer using Nav 1(vor) at a different airport, it was not able to detect the needle to final course on a localizer. When I tuned up Nav 2, it was able detect the course and I was able to shoot the approach using Nav 2.

Do you guys know if this is a malfuction with the Reciever #1 or is it something else that I missed?

Yes, I know that there is button you can push to make it switch from NAV/GPS. I tried both setting and NAV1 was still unable to detect the Localizer.
HOWEVER, it had no problem detecting ILS back to my airport.
Vor check was done on ground and it turns out fine.

Could it be Auto pilot?

THanks!~

Last edited by SongMan; 05-21-2008 at 02:34 PM.
Reply
Old 05-21-2008 | 09:23 PM
  #2  
de727ups's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,357
Likes: 0
From: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Default

I don't see how it could be the autopilot. Seeing how you were able to receive the localizer on nav 2, even though you couldn't with nav 1. And this only happened once, with nav one working fine before and after, I'd have to guess that maybe you had the freq wrong on nav 1? Did you identify the station? Are you 110% sure you had the GPS/Nav sw in nav?
Reply
Old 05-22-2008 | 03:09 AM
  #3  
Cubdriver's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
From: ATP, CFI etc.
Default

Always identify your station as part of the approach setup before starting an approach and if the airplane has a decent audio panel as this one does, maintain a quiet monitoring of the navaid morse code in the background while you fly the approach. This 1) tells you the nav is tuned to the right freq and 2) tells you the nav/ navaid combo is working as you fly the approach. If you had the morse code signal coming from nav 1 and still the flag never drops away from the VOR head, then you know it's the VOR head causing the problem. Usually it's the nav radio being inoperative or tuned to the wrong freq when this happens, so it's hard to know exactly what happened.

Last edited by Cubdriver; 05-22-2008 at 03:14 AM.
Reply
Old 05-22-2008 | 06:38 AM
  #4  
atlmsl's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: ATL
Default

Probably wrong freq in Nav 1. If you are sure it was correct, then I'm stumped
Reply
Old 05-22-2008 | 09:16 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: C172, PA28, PA44...Right
Default

I was thinking it would be the wrong frequency as well. Other than that, seemed okay.

Cubdriver, that's a great suggestion, I never thought of that. I'll have to use it on my CFI/I.
Reply
Old 05-22-2008 | 01:45 PM
  #6  
the King's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
From: JS32 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver
Always identify your station as part of the approach setup before starting an approach and if the airplane has a decent audio panel as this one does, maintain a quiet monitoring of the navaid morse code in the background while you fly the approach. This 1) tells you the nav is tuned to the right freq and 2) tells you the nav/ navaid combo is working as you fly the approach. If you had the morse code signal coming from nav 1 and still the flag never drops away from the VOR head, then you know it's the VOR head causing the problem. Usually it's the nav radio being inoperative or tuned to the wrong freq when this happens, so it's hard to know exactly what happened.

This is the recommended procedure when operating on an NDB, since they are prone to atmospheric disturbances, have no flags, and the stations may be unmonitored. I've never used it for a VOR or LOC/ILS though. If you are lucky, the newest avionics ID a navaid themselves and can display it for you.
Reply
Old 05-22-2008 | 03:07 PM
  #7  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by the King
This is the recommended procedure when operating on an NDB, since they are prone to atmospheric disturbances, have no flags, and the stations may be unmonitored. I've never used it for a VOR or LOC/ILS though. If you are lucky, the newest avionics ID a navaid themselves and can display it for you.
This is great. I don't like it when I have bleed through on the signal and can hear the morse code the entire time.

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 05-22-2008 | 03:09 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Waiting for class to start...
Default

Yes G1000 was a cool system that I got to put a few hundred hours teaching in!
Reply
Old 05-22-2008 | 04:02 PM
  #9  
Senior Skipper's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
From: the correct seat
Default

Song Man,

Have you spoken to the avionics guy at your airport? They tend to know a wee bit more than us mere pilots about this stuff.
Reply
Old 05-23-2008 | 05:34 AM
  #10  
Cubdriver's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
From: ATP, CFI etc.
Default

Originally Posted by the King
This is the recommended procedure when operating on an NDB, since they are prone to atmospheric disturbances, have no flags, and the stations may be unmonitored. I've never used it for a VOR or LOC/ILS though. If you are lucky, the newest avionics ID a navaid themselves and can display it for you.
Agreed. These navaids are so reliable you generally wouldn't bother. Garmin G1000 shows the station identifier next to navaid frequency to let you know you are getting what you ask for, which is a nice feature.

Last edited by Cubdriver; 05-23-2008 at 09:31 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stinsonjr
Hangar Talk
2
04-26-2008 02:40 PM
joel payne
Hangar Talk
10
12-07-2007 05:36 PM
cargo hopeful
Cargo
21
03-05-2006 06:12 AM
Cjp21
Major
6
02-28-2006 06:44 PM
SWAcapt
Hangar Talk
3
11-05-2005 10:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices