Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

DWC phases out flight program

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2010, 06:59 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Default

It's for the better. This way kids won't be robbed of a real education.
Purpleanga is offline  
Old 03-26-2010, 08:20 PM
  #12  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 4
Default

Everyone got screwed with this, especially the instructors and staff of the program. It is pathetic how it was presented as well, Nadine Dowling stood there with no remorse and told students that they were ending the program that the college was founded on. when asked for a reason all she said was the the students did not get enough return on their investment for the first 15 years of employment and they (ITT/ESI) did not either. this was simpley a buisness investment for them that inturn made them a few bucks while negetivley effecting the lives of staff and students as well as the community and KASH.
Bwatsky is offline  
Old 03-27-2010, 05:03 AM
  #13  
Super Moderator
 
usmc-sgt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,945
Default

What is DWC South East going to do now when hiring picks up ie. Alpha Flying?

That place is like grad school to DWC.
usmc-sgt is offline  
Old 03-27-2010, 07:50 AM
  #14  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 4
Default

I was thinking about that. if they were hiring right now they would have some instructors to pick up. also MHT ramp half the staff has to be from dwc
Bwatsky is offline  
Old 03-27-2010, 11:20 AM
  #15  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 15
Default

RIP to the AFO program at Webster! As an alumni I can say it truly was one of a kind.

How do they plan on keeping instructors/professors around to graduate the current students?
Paws is offline  
Old 03-27-2010, 12:21 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,278
Default

Originally Posted by Paws View Post
How do they plan on keeping instructors/professors around to graduate the current students?
That is a great question. The professors have made a career out of this and are attached to the students, so they will stay until the end. The instructors never plan on being there that long and they don't make that much money. They will leave as soon as they get another job. It is going to be hard to get CFIs who will be willing to work for a flight school that will see less flying every day and will be gone in three years or sooner.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 03-27-2010, 07:17 PM
  #17  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 15
Default

I suggest a protest - put the benchs back on the roof
Paws is offline  
Old 03-27-2010, 08:14 PM
  #18  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default

While the alums may be bummed out, at least the kids will get to finish...that's a better deal than puppy mill students get when THEIR school closes.

Honestly I find it hard to argue with ITT on their reasoning...any rational calculation of return-on-investment simply does justify the cost of a four-year aviation program. Trust-fund babies are one thing, but most students will be in debt for decades, with nothing but bus-driver wages to show for it (not counting the 1% who will finish as widebody CA's at FDX).

It seems like ITT took the ethical road...just because the students are blinded by their passion does not mean that it's OK for institutions to take their money.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-28-2010, 03:31 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,278
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
While the alums may be bummed out, at least the kids will get to finish...that's a better deal than puppy mill students get when THEIR school closes.

Honestly I find it hard to argue with ITT on their reasoning...any rational calculation of return-on-investment simply does justify the cost of a four-year aviation program. Trust-fund babies are one thing, but most students will be in debt for decades, with nothing but bus-driver wages to show for it (not counting the 1% who will finish as widebody CA's at FDX).

It seems like ITT took the ethical road...just because the students are blinded by their passion does not mean that it's OK for institutions to take their money.
That is true, but why not try to reduce the training costs first?. $165 an hour for a 172 and $125 an hour for a CFI is way above normal rates. There are plenty of FBOs that offer great training from great CFIs at cheaper rates.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 03-31-2010, 02:22 PM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Mach Tuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: B737
Posts: 43
Default

LATEST NEWS!!

DWC is in jeopardy of losing its AABI accreditation. The soonest it would loose accreditation is July 2010, the latest July 2011. For those who do not understand look up H.R. 3371 and look under flight time and ground time for accredited collegiate flight programs....
Mach Tuck is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Airsupport
Regional
84
02-06-2010 09:38 AM
DWN3GRN
Major
22
12-06-2009 04:53 AM
n287hg
Regional
35
10-12-2009 06:40 AM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM
Maxclimb12
Major
1
03-18-2009 03:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices