Search

Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Pattern Work

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2010 | 09:38 PM
  #21  
detpilot's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
From: Trying not to crash
Default

Can't really 'totally violate' a 'recommended' entry
Until you hurt someone and/or bend metal, then it's "Careless or wreckless operation."

The aim is not regulatory. Until someone gets hurt.
Reply
Old 04-03-2010 | 09:48 PM
  #22  
ryan1234's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
From: USAF
Default

Originally Posted by detpilot
Until you hurt someone and/or bend metal, then it's "Careless or wreckless operation."

The aim is not regulatory. Until someone gets hurt.
If it was in formation, it would probably be condusive to normal operations, and not careless and wreckless unless you were doing something like 90 AOB @ 300kts

- The overhead is actually recommended; part of the FAST 'PTS':

AREA OF OPERATION: TRAFFIC PATTERNS
TASK: OVERHEAD 360º TRAFFIC PATERN
Objective: To determine that the applicant:

Configures the flight for the echelon formation appropriate to the direction of break
Maneuvers the flight to an initial approach for the landing runway
Makes the appropriate ATC or traffic advisory radio calls
Monitors other traffic in the pattern and de-conflicts as necessary
Gives the appropriate pitch-out radio calls for the break and interval
Flies the pattern as briefed using the appropriate altitude and airspeeds
Flies a stabilized final approach
Lands on the appropriate portion of the runway
Monitors the wingmen and ensures all have cleared the runway and are ready to taxi
Reply
Old 04-03-2010 | 11:38 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 110
Default

Brother....

Check your PM's.


USMC, not the fastest I've seen but a nice one

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1IGj...ext=1&index=49

Last edited by Grumble; 04-03-2010 at 11:52 PM.
Reply
Old 04-04-2010 | 10:15 AM
  #24  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by ryan1234
If it was in formation, it would probably be condusive to normal operations, and not careless and wreckless unless you were doing something like 90 AOB @ 300kts

- The overhead is actually recommended; part of the FAST 'PTS':

AREA OF OPERATION: TRAFFIC PATTERNS
TASK: OVERHEAD 360º TRAFFIC PATERN
Objective: To determine that the applicant:

Configures the flight for the echelon formation appropriate to the direction of break
Maneuvers the flight to an initial approach for the landing runway
Makes the appropriate ATC or traffic advisory radio calls
Monitors other traffic in the pattern and de-conflicts as necessary
Gives the appropriate pitch-out radio calls for the break and interval
Flies the pattern as briefed using the appropriate altitude and airspeeds
Flies a stabilized final approach
Lands on the appropriate portion of the runway
Monitors the wingmen and ensures all have cleared the runway and are ready to taxi
What is the FAST PTS?
Sounds like a formation lead PTS.

Grumble - that was a nice approach. Those crazy guys out in Japan!

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 04-04-2010 | 11:47 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 110
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
What is the FAST PTS?
Sounds like a formation lead PTS.

Grumble - that was a nice approach. Those crazy guys out in Japan!

USMCFLYR
If you watch, you'll see someone rolling out in the groove, then he gets a "very nice" after the break. Where's the comm discipline with a guy on the ball?!?! I say that in jest, that was a sweet break and pass.
Reply
Old 04-04-2010 | 01:36 PM
  #26  
ryan1234's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
From: USAF
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
What is the FAST PTS?
Sounds like a formation lead PTS.

Grumble - that was a nice approach. Those crazy guys out in Japan!

USMCFLYR
Although civilian formation flying (except for in waivered airspace) requires little more than a brief among the pilots on what's going to happen, organizations like FAST (comprised of 17 organizations) allow a standard of training that's been approved by the FAA to operate formation (and formation aerobatics) in waivered airspace. There's time requirements, training (ground and air), and a checkride for wing, lead, etc.

That part of the PTS was a little part of the lead checkride PTS, there's also one for wing, etc.

Of course these '360 overhead patterns' are a lot different than your average F/A-18 carrier break.

In waivered airspace though, with an ACE and FAST card, a civilian can pretty much do a 400kt, 5g, 90 AOB break (if the aircraft can do it) with no adverse consequences.
Reply
Old 04-04-2010 | 03:10 PM
  #27  
Cubdriver's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
From: ATP, CFI etc.
Default

Ryan... how's your L-39 acquisition coming? That's a great airplane for a civilian. I know flight schools with them, and the prices seem to be under 100k now, although the per hour operating expenses are still pretty high.

Last edited by Cubdriver; 04-04-2010 at 03:24 PM.
Reply
Old 04-04-2010 | 03:38 PM
  #28  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver
Ryan... how's your L-39 acquisition coming? That's a great airplane for a civilian. I know flight schools with them, and the prices seem to be under 100k now, although the per hour operating expenses are still pretty high.
I recenty saw a picture of the L-29 and I've seen the L-39 many times, but I must say - if I had to chose - that L-39 is the MUCH better looking aircraft!

Ryan - you said
That part of the PTS was a little part of the lead checkride PTS, there's also one for wing, etc.
We had one for the wing too - it said "DON'T HIT YOUR LEAD!"
It didn't always work I wouldn't mind getting some time in a L-39.

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 04-04-2010 | 03:42 PM
  #29  
ryan1234's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
From: USAF
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver
Ryan... how's your L-39 acquisition coming? That's a great airplane for a civilian. I know flight schools with them, and the prices seem to be under 100k now, although the per hour operating expenses are still pretty high.
Well....... I was working on something that's not really for me. I'm not a high-roller. If you've heard of any in reasonable condition under $100K (that are in the US) please let me know. There certainly have been a lot of fire-sales going on right now.

Yeah the engines have a TBO of 1000hrs, T/O fuel flow usually results in around 330gph - so it can be kinda pricey. It seems like a lot of people that get them are in the 'more money than brains' club... guess it's sorta like the 'doctor killer' Baron/Bonanzas
Reply
Old 04-04-2010 | 03:42 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 110
Default

Only things for a wingman to say, "2, you're on fire, I'll take the fat chick." Anything else is extraneous comm.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
deltabound
Foreign
18
03-28-2010 02:49 PM
Dangling Unit
Union Talk
0
06-05-2009 03:49 AM
Pontius Pilot
Regional
30
01-23-2009 06:17 AM
Tinkerbell
Major
51
08-10-2008 08:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices