ILS Question
#11
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 CA
Noy,
My best shot at it after just pulling it up on JEPPS - is note 3 - depicting the VNAV DH - and stating the restriction. If you look at that VNAV glideslope it's 3.76 vs 3.77 on the ILS - they most likely would not have been able to depict that VNAV portion on the ILS page without it getting very confusing - again just a guess but since there was a VNAV portion to the LOC - with its own mins that differed from the LOC or the ILS - and they wanted to show that glideslope they went with the two approach plates vs 1.
My best shot at it after just pulling it up on JEPPS - is note 3 - depicting the VNAV DH - and stating the restriction. If you look at that VNAV glideslope it's 3.76 vs 3.77 on the ILS - they most likely would not have been able to depict that VNAV portion on the ILS page without it getting very confusing - again just a guess but since there was a VNAV portion to the LOC - with its own mins that differed from the LOC or the ILS - and they wanted to show that glideslope they went with the two approach plates vs 1.
#12
Thread Starter
New Hire
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: CFI - Whatever I can Fly
Great input and somewhere in the halls of bureaucracy there must be someone who knows for sure! Thanks everyone for your input. Anyone have the email address to the chart folks?
#13
so just what is important out there..... You're exactly right, do be careful out there.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




