Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

ILS Training

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2009 | 11:41 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Default ILS Training

I am currently the training officer for a small 135 outfit in North Texas. We recently finished a recurrent training course for all of our pilots. During the course of the training I was explaining how to identify the final approach fix on an ILS:
Final approach fix=glide slope intercept at the published altitude on the approach plate (lightning bolt)
One of our pilots insists that the FAF on the ILS is glide slope intercept no matter what your altitude, in other words if you intercept the glideslope 20 miles out at 5000 feet, that is your final approach fix.

He also insists that this is the way he was taught at two of his previous employers, one of them being American Eagle.

Is this how American Eagle and other airlines, regional or otherwise, teach final approach fix on an ILS?

Any comments are welcome,
IJ
Reply
Old 02-18-2009 | 11:55 AM
  #2  
Bond's Avatar
Gets Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: On Top
Default

Originally Posted by igbyjet
I am currently the training officer for a small 135 outfit in North Texas. We recently finished a recurrent training course for all of our pilots. During the course of the training I was explaining how to identify the final approach fix on an ILS:
Final approach fix=glide slope intercept at the published altitude on the approach plate (lightning bolt)
One of our pilots insists that the FAF on the ILS is glide slope intercept no matter what your altitude, in other words if you intercept the glideslope 20 miles out at 5000 feet, that is your final approach fix.

He also insists that this is the way he was taught at two of his previous employers, one of them being American Eagle.

Is this how American Eagle and other airlines, regional or otherwise, teach final approach fix on an ILS?

Any comments are welcome,
IJ
So would that also mean that he would configure for landing 20 miles out? What a tool, I honestly don't think this guy ever flew 121, otherwise he would know better.
Reply
Old 02-18-2009 | 11:59 AM
  #3  
JetJock16's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
From: SkyWest Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by igbyjet
I am currently the training officer for a small 135 outfit in North Texas. We recently finished a recurrent training course for all of our pilots. During the course of the training I was explaining how to identify the final approach fix on an ILS:
Final approach fix=glide slope intercept at the published altitude on the approach plate (lightning bolt)
One of our pilots insists that the FAF on the ILS is glide slope intercept no matter what your altitude, in other words if you intercept the glideslope 20 miles out at 5000 feet, that is your final approach fix.

He also insists that this is the way he was taught at two of his previous employers, one of them being American Eagle.

Is this how American Eagle and other airlines, regional or otherwise, teach final approach fix on an ILS?

Any comments are welcome,
IJ
You are correct, GS + GS Intercept ALT = FAF. This is cut and dry.
Reply
Old 02-18-2009 | 12:01 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Satan's Camaro
Default

Well, it also depends on the capabilities of the aircraft. If you can't descend on the glideslope and slow down for configuration, then you can indeed start to configure 20 miles out. That being said, if you slow to your final approach speed at 20 miles out, you will absolutely guaranteed get torn a new one by ATC.
Reply
Old 02-18-2009 | 12:04 PM
  #5  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Well....it seems we have one vote for the guy being "a tool" and one vote for the guy being "cut and dry".
Can either of you provide igbyjet a reference?

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 02-18-2009 | 12:18 PM
  #6  
DryMotorBoatin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Seat 0B
Default

No...GS @ GS Int. Alt end of story. That allows the use of time for determining the MAP if you lose GS inside the FAF. If you use an arbitrary intercept altitude to determine the FAF then you cannot use time to determine MAP GS/InOp.
Reply
Old 02-18-2009 | 12:21 PM
  #7  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,868
Likes: 664
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Well....it seems we have one vote for the guy being "a tool" and one vote for the guy being "cut and dry".
Can either of you provide igbyjet a reference?

USMCFLYR
They are both saying the same thing. JetJock is saying that the FAF is located at the published GS intercept-altitude (presumably you are on the GS by that point), which is correct.

I think somebody must not have been paying attention in Eagle ground school
Reply
Old 02-18-2009 | 12:31 PM
  #8  
Slice's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
From: Spartan
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
They are both saying the same thing. JetJock is saying that the FAF is located at the published GS intercept-altitude (presumably you are on the GS by that point), which is correct.

I think somebody must not have been paying attention in Eagle ground school
Probably a 300 hr wonder when he got hired. Wasn't Eagle doing that for a while recently...kind of like the 300 hr wonder I flew with at Mesa that told me he wish he had more x-wind experience while learning to fly, while acting as my FO.
Reply
Old 02-18-2009 | 01:03 PM
  #9  
PiperPower's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Default

This reminds me of an instrument stage check I had. I flew the ILS exactly as published, and intercepted the glideslope at the published intercept altitude.

I passed the checkride, but afterwards my examiner asked me, "why wouldn't you have just intercepted the glideslope at 3,000 since that's where we were when we intercepted the localizer? (glide slope intercept was 2,700). I was confused as to the reason he was asking me... I think I said something like, "because the approach says the GS intercept altitude is 2,700." Then he went off about how you can intercept it from any altitude, and it doesn't say anywhere that you have to be at the GS intercept altitude.

I didn't want to argue with him, especially since I passed, but I thought he was incorrect.
Reply
Old 02-18-2009 | 01:16 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Default

Here it is cut and dry folks. You may join the glide slope at a higher or even lower altitude then published GS INT altitude. But remember this, you are not inside the final approach fix until passing throught that alt. Why does that matter? Because if the weather falls below mins and youre inside the FAF you may continue. If you are not inside the FAF (above published intercept alt but on GS) and the weather falls below mins you must go missed as by part 121. Any AE pilot would know that. This dude is clueless
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Time2Fly
Corporate
38
08-11-2010 09:17 PM
proskuneho
Hiring News
7
02-06-2009 08:15 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
gderek
Cargo
3
10-11-2008 12:14 PM
ChillBillPilot
Major
32
10-09-2008 04:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices