Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

New training-Cessna feels weird

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2011, 12:13 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Airline Captain
Posts: 540
Default

Youwill find that over time the control cables get a little slack in them. That means newer ones are tight and older ones have miniscule amounts of play in em. I have a LOT moe time in old 172's than I do in new ones. I never really noticed a difference in the flying characterists, except the newer 180hp ones climb a little better on a hot day.
Walkeraviator is offline  
Old 07-02-2011, 02:21 PM
  #12  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default Bungees and Aileron/Rudder Interconnect

It has been a long time since I flew a Cessna, but I am pretty certain they use a rubber bungee to interconnect the rudder to the ailerons. This allows people who have no concept of how to use a rudder to get some rudder during aileron input. The bungee is overridable by guys with proper experience.

I would guess: older airplanes--the bungee is stretched, and soft. Newer airplanes: still pretty stiff.

Couple that with tight control cables (not stretched yet), and yes, the new airplane could feel different---heavier.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 07-03-2011, 12:32 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fjetter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: King Air 200 CA Hawker 800/900 FO
Posts: 810
Default

To the OP: while my experience in Skyhawks is limited without a doubt if your "new" instructor feels like you are a horrible pilot and hates his job DO NOT fly with him/her again...it will be a waste of your money and time. There may be some subtle differences with the newer aircraft and a truly experienced and professional instructor will explain them to you. It's unfortunate that instructors like this ruin it for those of us that really do understand what it means to be a professional instructor.
fjetter is offline  
Old 07-03-2011, 09:23 AM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
airline NooB's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 53
Default

Cable tension...
Bell crank lubrication...
Linkage wear...

Fewer student colliding with terra-firma during touch and goes...

Sometimes newer just means tighter.

Each has its own personality.
airline NooB is offline  
Old 07-05-2011, 05:49 AM
  #15  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Comet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 37
Default

Thanks for all the replies
the problem is that flight schools here are pre-paid. So I've already paid them (they all work like this) and he is the only CFI for the time being.
Comet is offline  
Old 07-05-2011, 01:20 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
flyingsaluki1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 37
Default

My school has both the older P models and the 2003 R models of the 172. They do feel slightly different in the control forces and flight characteristics. But I think that might be due to the difference in age.

I've noticed in our old 152's that every single one has a different feel. I call it the personality of the airplane. Over the years control wires have stretched, been fixed, and this has resulted in no two airplane being alike. I can almost close my eyes while flying and tell you which of the 12 152's that my school has that I'm flying.

The newer R models are completely indistinguishable from each other. They all feel exactly the same, maybe a little bit more sluggish than the other 172's. They are easier to fly smoother too.
flyingsaluki1 is offline  
Old 07-07-2011, 07:29 AM
  #17  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Comet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 37
Default

so had a talk with the CFI about how I'm not learning anything.. this time he was very laid back and cool, I had a great flight, and turns out I was right about something being wrong.. the right rudder when applied isn't letting go, it is getting stuck!
Comet is offline  
Old 07-07-2011, 11:19 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 134
Default

Not sure how many hours the 2004 skyhawk your flying has? but...what Walkeraviation said, the newer ones can be 'different' from older ones. we had everything from 6000 hour plus M and N model skyhawks up to a 2008 SP with very few hours on it. You'll find the oder ones fly a little differently from the new aircraft. Theres a couple of rubber bushing and metal bearings in the control column that tend to 'wear' as they age making the older skyhawks feel 'responsive' or looser in a good way, and the new ones with tight bushings and bearings a little numb when it comes to feeling the aircraft. Cable tension and pulley bearings get 'broken-in' over time.

Spend more time in the new airplane. you'll get used to it.
doublerjay is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KennyG1700
Flight Schools and Training
40
08-01-2019 12:53 AM
iceman49
Hangar Talk
23
05-12-2011 10:35 AM
Moose
Hangar Talk
8
08-30-2009 09:00 PM
ChillBillPilot
Major
32
10-09-2008 04:35 PM
MaydayMark
Cargo
7
08-30-2007 06:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices