Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Glide Slope...

Old 11-04-2006, 03:08 PM
  #11  
Pro Button Pusher
 
Jetalc's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: A320 Series CA
Posts: 181
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC View Post
The second half of your post raises the very important point that we must know when we are established on the Final Approach segment. The first half demonstrates that the answer is NOT when we cross a particular point.

I just pulled up the ILS to Rwy 18R at MEM as a "random" example. (If this link doesn't work, go to Fltplan.com and navigate to MEM, and the ILS 18R http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0611/00253I18R.PDF )
The glideslope intercept altitude is 3000'. The FAF crossing altitude on glideslope is 1876'. Consider 3 scenarios. In each scenario, ATC clears the pilot for the ILS. When is he established on the Final Approach Segment? In scenario 1 he is vectored at 4000'. In Scenario 2, he is vectored at 3000'. In Scenario 3, he is vectored at 2000'.

In scenario 1, he maintains 4000' until intercepting the glideslope, and then begins down. On Final? No. Not until he passes the glideslope intercept altitude at 3000'.

In scenario 2, he maintains 3000' until intercepting the glideslope, and then begins down. On Final? Yes. And, it's at the same point over the ground as in scenario 1.

In scenario 3, he maintains 2000'. About 3.3 miles prior to intercepting the glideslope, he passes the same point on the ground where the airplanes in Scenarios 1 and 2 began their final appraoch segments. Is he then on the final approach segment? No. It is not until he intercepts the glideslope at HIS altitude that he is on the Final Approach Segment.


In fact, there could be an infinite number of points at which the Final Approach could be commenced on a precision approach - - but not a single Final Approach Fix. Not a Maltese Cross, not a lightning bolt, and not an arrow.





BROKE CFI - - Where in AIM Chapter 1?



.
Sorry, Tony - maybe it's me, but it seems like you're talking in circles, and saying, in a different way, what I already stated. In your first two examples, the published GS int altitude is the same, regardless of where the GS is intercepted. It is the PUBLISHED altitude that counts. You repeated what I had already said. In both cases (int at 4000 and int at 3000), the spot over the ground that is considered the FAF is the same. That is a point that can be found to have the same lat/long, GPS fix, whatever.

According to the Pilot/Controller Glossary:
"FINAL APPROACH FIX- The fix from which the final approach (IFR) to an airport is executed and which identifies the beginning of the final approach segment. It is designated on Government charts by the Maltese Cross symbol for nonprecision approaches and the lightning bolt symbol for precision approaches; or when ATC directs a lower-than-published glideslope/path intercept altitude, it is the resultant actual point of the glideslope/path intercept. I believe that's what I already said.

Not sure what you mean by "On final." You could be aligned with the runway centerline, heading toward the runway, and not even be on the Final Approach Segment (since the intermediate segment ends at the FAF, by definition). Do you mean "at the FAF?"

You state: "In fact, there could be an infinite number of points at which the Final Approach could be commenced on a precision approach - - but not a single Final Approach Fix. Not a Maltese Cross, not a lightning bolt, and not an arrow." Well, I agree with you, but that's NOT what we're talking about. We're talking about the definition of a FAF, not where you believe you're "turnin' onto final." Big difference.

A fix, according to the FAA, is simply a generic term "used to define a predetermined geographical position used for route definition. A fix may be a ground-based NAVAID, a waypoint or defined by reference to one or more radio NAVAIDs." Perhaps you have issue with the use of the FAA's word "Fix" in "Final Approach Fix," since the geographical position isn't always the same?

The FAA uses the word "Final Approach Fix" in many instances, and not unintentionally:

"(2) Glide Slope Critical Area. Vehicles and aircraft are not authorized in the area when an arriving aircraft is between the ILS final approach fix and the airport unless the aircraft has reported the airport in sight and is circling or side stepping to land on a runway other than the ILS runway. "

"The primary ILS approaches for Los Angeles are attached for reference. Both contain an abundance of “slow-down-while-going-down,” but the 25 ILS is arguably worse, because the speed brakes can be deployed on the 24 approach, and some attempt can be made to play catch up before the precision final approach fix (PFAF). "

"The final approach fix is generally situated anywhere from 3˝ to 5 miles from the runway threshold. The pilot will normally prepare the aircraft so that it is configured and ready to fly a stabilized descent by the time the aircraft intercepts the glideslope."

There isn't enough room here to post the thousands of times the FAA uses the word "ILS Final Approach Fix."

If it is the word "fix" you have a problem with, maybe you can coerce the FAA into changing it. However, stating (erroneously) that there is no FAF on a precision approach is misleading at best. Arrogant and ignorant at worst, and I'm not sure which category you fall into, since I don't know you.
Jetalc is offline  
Old 11-04-2006, 03:19 PM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: EMB-145
Posts: 61
Default

I'm not sure where at in AIM chapter one i dont have the book on me right now. I just know its in there cause chapter 1 is all about navigation aids (vors, localizers, glide slope, etc)
BROKE CFI is offline  
Old 11-04-2006, 03:42 PM
  #13  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by Jetalc View Post

Sorry, Tony - maybe it's me, but it seems like you're talking in circles, and saying, in a different way, what I already stated. In your first two examples, the published GS int altitude is the same, regardless of where the GS is intercepted. It is the PUBLISHED altitude that counts. You repeated what I had already said. In both cases (int at 4000 and int at 3000), the spot over the ground that is considered the FAF is the same. That is a point that can be found to have the same lat/long, GPS fix, whatever.

According to the Pilot/Controller Glossary:
"FINAL APPROACH FIX- The fix from which the final approach (IFR) to an airport is executed and which identifies the beginning of the final approach segment. It is designated on Government charts by the Maltese Cross symbol for nonprecision approaches and the lightning bolt symbol for precision approaches; or when ATC directs a lower-than-published glideslope/path intercept altitude, it is the resultant actual point of the glideslope/path intercept. I believe that's what I already said.


It's not a suprise that communication is difficult when the terms used are so imprecise. We are close, I believe, to understanding the same thing. Indeed, in scenarios #1 and #2, the Final Approach Segment begins at the same geographical point, and we could measure the coordinates of that point. But that's beside the point.

Originally Posted by Jetalc View Post

A fix, according to the FAA, is simply a generic term "used to define a predetermined geographical position used for route definition. A fix may be a ground-based NAVAID, a waypoint or defined by reference to one or more radio NAVAIDs." Perhaps you have issue with the use of the FAA's word "Fix" in "Final Approach Fix," since the geographical position isn't always the same?

Now we're getting somewhere. Since the point at which the Final Approach Segment is NOT predetermined, since it is affected by the altitude at which the airplane intercepts the glideslope, there can be no point published and labeled as the Final Approach Fix. Clearly, the geographical point at which the airplane in Scenario #3 commenced the Final Approach Segment was much different than the point in #1 and #2. Which was predetermined?


Originally Posted by Jetalc View Post

Not sure what you mean by "On final." You could be aligned with the runway centerline, heading toward the runway, and not even be on the Final Approach Segment (since the intermediate segment ends at the FAF, by definition). Do you mean "at the FAF?"

By "on final" I mean established on the Final Approach Segment. For a Non-Precision Approach, that would be on course inside the FAF. For a Precision Approach, that would be on course, on glidepath, at or below the published glide-slope intercept altitude. We haven't mentioned Jepps in this discussion, yet, but for Jepps users, that means "in the feather."




Originally Posted by Jetalc View Post

You state: "In fact, there could be an infinite number of points at which the Final Approach could be commenced on a precision approach - - but not a single Final Approach Fix. Not a Maltese Cross, not a lightning bolt, and not an arrow." Well, I agree with you, but that's NOT what we're talking about. We're talking about the definition of a FAF, not where you believe you're "turnin' onto final." Big difference.

"turnin' onto final" <-- trying to put words in my mouth. I don't approach this subject cavalierly, and I don't have to believe. The transition from the Intermediate Approach Segment to the Final Approach Segment is well-defined, and it does not depend on a predetermined geographical position. I submit, therefore, that any use of the word FIX with this transition is a misnomer at best, lazy at worst.



Originally Posted by Jetalc View Post


The FAA uses the word "Final Approach Fix" in many instances, and not unintentionally:

"(2) Glide Slope Critical Area. Vehicles and aircraft are not authorized in the area when an arriving aircraft is between the ILS final approach fix and the airport unless the aircraft has reported the airport in sight and is circling or side stepping to land on a runway other than the ILS runway. "

"The primary ILS approaches for Los Angeles are attached for reference. Both contain an abundance of “slow-down-while-going-down,” but the 25 ILS is arguably worse, because the speed brakes can be deployed on the 24 approach, and some attempt can be made to play catch up before the precision final approach fix (PFAF). "

"The final approach fix is generally situated anywhere from 3˝ to 5 miles from the runway threshold. The pilot will normally prepare the aircraft so that it is configured and ready to fly a stabilized descent by the time the aircraft intercepts the glideslope."

There isn't enough room here to post the thousands of times the FAA uses the word "ILS Final Approach Fix."

If it is the word "fix" you have a problem with, maybe you can coerce the FAA into changing it. However, stating (erroneously) that there is no FAF on a precision approach is misleading at best. Arrogant and ignorant at worst, and I'm not sure which category you fall into, since I don't know you.

Like I said - - misnomer at best, lazy at worst.





.
TonyC is offline  
Old 11-04-2006, 03:45 PM
  #14  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by BROKE CFI View Post

I'm not sure where at in AIM chapter one i dont have the book on me right now. I just know its in there cause chapter 1 is all about navigation aids (vors, localizers, glide slope, etc)


Here's one right here: Aeronautical Information Manual










.
TonyC is offline  
Old 11-04-2006, 03:51 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 187
Default

This brings up the difference bettwen FAP and FAF. An ILS has a final approach point, not fix. It occurs at GS intercept. This may be well before the maltese cross or a little bit after it. You're not actually considered to be on the final approach segment untill you have intercepted the GS regardless of where the Maltese Cross is.
rightseater is offline  
Old 11-04-2006, 04:30 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
BEWELCH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: C-172
Posts: 83
Default Glide Slope Cont'd

Why Doesn't A Cat Ii Or Iii Approach Have A Maltese Cross??
BEWELCH is offline  
Old 11-04-2006, 06:14 PM
  #17  
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
FlyerJosh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Executive Transport Driver
Posts: 3,080
Default

Originally Posted by BEWELCH View Post
Why Doesn't A Cat Ii Or Iii Approach Have A Maltese Cross??
Because by definition, a Cat II or Cat II approach is a precision approach. You won't see the maltese cross on any precision approach. It designates the Final Approach FIX for a non precision approach.

When you see the maltese cross on a regular ILS chart (Not Cat II/III) it isn't part of the "ILS" approach. It's part of the "LOC" approach, or ILS approach/glideslope out of service (IE non-precision).
FlyerJosh is offline  
Old 11-04-2006, 11:35 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sigep_nm's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 614
Default

The FAF on an ILS is for timing purposes in case of a loss of glideslope on the approach. It is used to determine arrival at the missed approach point since you will no longer be able to arrive at DH on glideslope. Not that hard to figure out.
sigep_nm is offline  
Old 11-05-2006, 04:56 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,599
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC View Post
No.



No.



A precision appraoch does not have a Final Approach Fix, per se, and the Maltese Cross has no relevance to the precision approach. It depicts the FAF for the non-precision approach.





.
You are correct, I have edited my previous post.
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Old 11-06-2006, 01:52 PM
  #20  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 15
Default

Originally Posted by rightseater View Post
This brings up the difference bettwen FAP and FAF. An ILS has a final approach point, not fix.
That is incorrect the FAP = the point, applicable only to a nonprecision approach with no depicted FAF.

Pilot/Controller Glossary

Last edited by 3664shaken; 11-06-2006 at 01:53 PM. Reason: Quote didn't work right
3664shaken is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices