Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
Fellow CFI's questions about logging time >

Fellow CFI's questions about logging time

Search

Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Fellow CFI's questions about logging time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2012 | 07:50 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Default Fellow CFI's questions about logging time

I just have a couple questions about what should go in the logbook as dual given.

Do most of you log your ground in your logbook as dual given?

Can you use the Sim time dual given towards ATP mins? or do I need to have another CFI there while I am using the sim to sign my logbook to count that?

Thanks in Advance.
Reply
Old 09-17-2012 | 11:34 AM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: 320 CA
Default Fellow CFI's questions about logging time

I only logged dual given as actual instruction in the airplane. Ground lessons and sim time I never logged in my log book. No it does not count towards your ATP.
Reply
Old 09-17-2012 | 03:56 PM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Default

I only log dual given when I am in the airplane
Reply
Old 09-17-2012 | 06:59 PM
  #4  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,908
Likes: 693
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Exclamation

Sim instruction given is NOT "Dual Given". It is not anything at all.

But you can log it in one of your blank columns if you like; it might help you get a sim instructor or 141 job someday.

But don't ever confuse anything sim with flight time or total time in a real airplane. In some cases you can apply sim time towards certs or ratings, but you do that on the 8710...do NOT do it in your logbook. Trust me, you will be creating a confusing mess that will bite you in the butt when you apply for turbine jobs.
Reply
Old 09-17-2012 | 07:03 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Default

thanks guys, I was expecting a different answer, at least about the dual given time. i realize flight time is flight time, but dual given, i thought was any instruction given.
Reply
Old 09-17-2012 | 07:05 PM
  #6  
Twin Wasp's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 0
From: Sr. VP of button pushing
Default

So what are you going to use for the registration number for ground training, the street address?

61.159 addresses the requirements for an ATP, including crediting sim time towards the 75 hours of instrument time and 1500 hours total time. It's pitiful when a CFI is unable to read the FARs. The only thing sim instructor time counts for is payroll.
Reply
Old 09-17-2012 | 07:08 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp
So what are you going to use for the registration number for ground training, the street address?

61.159 addresses the requirements for an ATP, including crediting sim time towards the 75 hours of instrument time and 1500 hours total time. It's pitiful when a CFI is unable to read the FARs. The only thing sim instructor time counts for is payroll.

^^^^^ what he said.
Reply
Old 09-17-2012 | 08:15 PM
  #8  
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 46
From: Volleyball Player
Default

Originally Posted by jerjon7
thanks guys, I was expecting a different answer, at least about the dual given time. i realize flight time is flight time, but dual given, i thought was any instruction given.
There are multiple ways that support the current interpretation of it being flight time. There's the 8hr rule, the rule about dual received (must be flight time, not sim time, unless in an actual simulator and not an FTD), being labeled as "aeronautical experience" in certificate/rating appendices of part 61/141, and so on.
Reply
Old 09-18-2012 | 06:04 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
Default

There's no FAA requirement to log "dual given" at all, so the choice is more a matter of convention than regulation. It's more a matter of what you plan to use it for.

If you are using "dual given" as a shorthand for "flight training given," the FAR defines that as in an aircraft. That the way most log it since it also counts as loggable "flight time."

Some include training in a simulator since it technically counts as "pilot time." I haven't heard of it being done but some might use a looser definition of "dual given" to include all "training time" whether flight training or not.

Since the FAA doesn't ask you to track it it doesn't matter that much.... except I can't imagine a use for it where you wouldn't want to break it down into its' ground, air, and simulator components.

btw, you can use dual given in a sim for one ATP requirement. 61.159(a) refers to "at least 1,500 hours of total time as a pilot." "Pilot time" does include training given in a simulator. Problem is that all of the subcategories of the ATP requirements involve "flight time." If you meet those requirements, it's unlikely that you will also need a few excess hours of non-flight "pilot time."

(All the definitions I mention are in FAR 1.1 and 61.1)
Reply
Old 09-18-2012 | 07:00 AM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp
So what are you going to use for the registration number for ground training, the street address?

61.159 addresses the requirements for an ATP, including crediting sim time towards the 75 hours of instrument time and 1500 hours total time. It's pitiful when a CFI is unable to read the FARs. The only thing sim instructor time counts for is payroll.

It is pitiful that people have to put people down for asking a simple question on a forum board. Let me guess, you never asked a question on here that you could of looked up yourself? How about looking for clarification for something you just weren't sure about?



Thanks to everyone else that clarified a question I had without insulting. I was mostly concerned about this when applying for jobs, I did not want to put anything innacurate on my resume.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rickB
Part 135
29
10-26-2011 01:12 PM
xfzz
Fractional
15
10-27-2009 05:37 PM
JeepDrowner
Regional
85
10-03-2009 05:18 AM
TipTip35
Cargo
5
03-30-2007 03:14 PM
colinflyin
Regional
10
03-13-2007 09:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices