Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
K-State gets the 1,000 hr exemption >

K-State gets the 1,000 hr exemption

Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

K-State gets the 1,000 hr exemption

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-30-2013, 06:02 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hypoxia's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 278
Default

Originally Posted by rcfd13 View Post
Be a mentor and a good captain and you'll do fine just like thousands before you have.
Absolutely!
hypoxia is offline  
Old 07-30-2013, 06:18 AM
  #22  
Line Holder
 
bcaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: BE200
Posts: 99
Default

The K-state degree program COMBINED with the flight training, lead by a very competent and industry connected faculty/staff, is what allowed me to obtain an internship and a subsequent full time position, at 700 hours total time, which provided me with several type ratings and has enabled me to be where I am now; three Years closer to retirement with 2100tt 1700PIC 1000Turbine, making more money than I ever planned flying 500 hours a year, seeing cool places, yet spending 19/20 nights in my own bed. I can't attribute it to anything except the guidance provided by K-state, and a little luck on my end.
I'm not meaning to argue that "aviation degrees are awesome", I have my backup plans in place. So...yeah...don't misinterpret my words.

EMAW and congrats to the program for achieving this waiver!!
bcaviator is offline  
Old 07-30-2013, 06:21 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hypoxia's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 278
Default

Originally Posted by rcfd13 View Post
My airline pairs new hires with captain upgrades for both ground school and sim. I'm assuming most do the same? Be glad that your sim partner is now required to have 1000/1500 hours rather than the 300-600 they were able to be hired at in the past.
Big difference was "in the past" they were training First Officers! Correct me if I am wrong but my understanding is the pilot now has to be trained to pass the "Captain's" checkride unless of course it is water downed which makes this whole process a sham?

With all due respect, that requires a hell of a lot more "experience" than flying a Katana around for a 1000 hours and all the "mentoring" in the world won't make up for it!

Note: My comments are not directed at K-State or any school in particular but the "new process" in general!
hypoxia is offline  
Old 07-30-2013, 06:39 AM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
bcaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: BE200
Posts: 99
Default

Originally Posted by hypoxia View Post
Big difference was "in the past" they were training First Officers! Correct me if I am wrong but my understanding is the pilot now has to be trained to pass the "Captain's" checkride unless of course it is water downed which makes this whole process a sham?

With all due respect, that requires a hell of a lot more "experience" than flying a Katana around for a 1000 hours and all the "mentoring" in the world won't make up for it!

Note: My comments are not directed at K-State or any school in particular but the "new process" in general!
I very much agree! I don't like using total time because it isn't apples to apples. That being said, KSU has a CRJ700 FTD with which they do CRM training, Advanced aircraft systems training, and loft style flying in. In addition, they use bonanzas for complex and barons for multi. They also have a C90 which the students get to fly right seat in for KSU faculty transportation.
That's just the beginning. So you're right. That vs 1000 hours spinning circles just don't compare. And it's being recognized with this waiver.
bcaviator is offline  
Old 07-30-2013, 06:51 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hypoxia's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 278
Default

Originally Posted by bcaviator View Post
I very much agree! I don't like using total time because it isn't apples to apples. That being said, KSU has a CRJ700 FTD with which they do CRM training, Advanced aircraft systems training, and loft style flying in. In addition, they use bonanzas for complex and barons for multi. They also have a C90 which the students get to fly right seat in for KSU faculty transportation.
That's just the beginning. So you're right. That vs 1000 hours spinning circles just don't compare. And it's being recognized with this waiver.
I browsed the K-State website and I am impressed! Integrating airline style training from the start is exactly what is needed to arm the pilot with the ability to pass a PIC type rating at 1000 hours total flight time!
hypoxia is offline  
Old 07-30-2013, 03:10 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NWA320pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 1,166
Default

Not criticizing but what is the real world experience level in relation to airline flying by K state instructors?
NWA320pilot is offline  
Old 07-31-2013, 06:07 AM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
bcaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: BE200
Posts: 99
Default

Originally Posted by NWA320pilot View Post
Not criticizing but what is the real world experience level in relation to airline flying by K state instructors?
For the average instructor that may be exaggerated a bit, however the instructor/professor who teaches a lot of the advanced classes has several years in the airlines on the CRJ and Saab.
bcaviator is offline  
Old 07-31-2013, 06:58 AM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 46
Default

I'm a graduate of a school similar to K state and the school applied for its exemption as well. I fall right into the R-ATP window (1100TT, 115ME) and have received job offers from some regionals.

I know the prevailing opinion is the college is no substitute for experience, and I agree with that partially. But 6 years ago I couldn't keep an instructor for my commercial MEL because they were all getting to be 250 hour pilots leaving for the airlines.

Is anyone in the same boat as me?
WeHaveWhiskey is offline  
Old 07-31-2013, 10:34 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hypoxia's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 278
Default

Originally Posted by WeHaveWhiskey View Post
I'm a graduate of a school similar to K state and the school applied for its exemption as well. I fall right into the R-ATP window (1100TT, 115ME) and have received job offers from some regionals.

I know the prevailing opinion is the college is no substitute for experience, and I agree with that partially. But 6 years ago I couldn't keep an instructor for my commercial MEL because they were all getting to be 250 hour pilots leaving for the airlines.

Is anyone in the same boat as me?
In my 25 year airline career, I've flown with low time pilots that were outstanding! I've also flown with 10,000 hour pilots that were horrible! The fact is, this new R-ATP and ATP requirements means that if you have the new minimums, you are eligible for employment. Does that make the new first officer a safer and more competent pilot? Probably not! It does however, force the regional airlines to consider any and all applicants that have the "new minimums" because there are no other options!

If a pilot had 250 hours and was exceptional then I would love to fly with him or her. However, this is the new standard and only time will tell if it produces "safer" pilots. I have my doubts for a number of reasons! Becoming an airline pilot has become financially out of reach for many. Hence, only military pilots, "rich kids" or those who are stupid enough to incur 6 digits worth of student loans will ever become airline pilots!
hypoxia is offline  
Old 07-31-2013, 11:06 AM
  #30  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
That kind of ad-hoc background (combined with the attention-to-detail military culture common at US airlines) is why US airline pilots are safer than any others IMO. We have a lot of people who are good sticks with real-world experience that European and Asian pilots don't have and will probably never get.

Low time pilots who are trained from day one for transport category operations tend to be good at programming the box and doing ILS approaches with a 5,700 NM straight-in final. Actually flying airplanes, not so much.
This! I came out of an aviation university as a hot-shot who thought he could fly airplanes. Flying a Champ without an electrical system was a humbling experience. I can say that I'm a much better pilot due to my time spent screwing around in little old fabric-covered machines than I ever was coming out of a 141 training environment.
pete2800 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KIGONYE
Regional
30
09-30-2010 09:09 AM
SourGrapes
Major
50
03-08-2010 05:19 PM
Longbow64
Hangar Talk
2
10-18-2009 10:00 AM
Longbow64
Money Talk
7
09-09-2009 08:34 AM
fireman0174
Major
19
06-14-2006 09:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices