K-State gets the 1,000 hr exemption
#22
The K-state degree program COMBINED with the flight training, lead by a very competent and industry connected faculty/staff, is what allowed me to obtain an internship and a subsequent full time position, at 700 hours total time, which provided me with several type ratings and has enabled me to be where I am now; three Years closer to retirement with 2100tt 1700PIC 1000Turbine, making more money than I ever planned flying 500 hours a year, seeing cool places, yet spending 19/20 nights in my own bed. I can't attribute it to anything except the guidance provided by K-state, and a little luck on my end.
I'm not meaning to argue that "aviation degrees are awesome", I have my backup plans in place. So...yeah...don't misinterpret my words.
EMAW and congrats to the program for achieving this waiver!!
I'm not meaning to argue that "aviation degrees are awesome", I have my backup plans in place. So...yeah...don't misinterpret my words.
EMAW and congrats to the program for achieving this waiver!!
#23
With all due respect, that requires a hell of a lot more "experience" than flying a Katana around for a 1000 hours and all the "mentoring" in the world won't make up for it!
Note: My comments are not directed at K-State or any school in particular but the "new process" in general!
#24
Big difference was "in the past" they were training First Officers! Correct me if I am wrong but my understanding is the pilot now has to be trained to pass the "Captain's" checkride unless of course it is water downed which makes this whole process a sham?
With all due respect, that requires a hell of a lot more "experience" than flying a Katana around for a 1000 hours and all the "mentoring" in the world won't make up for it!
Note: My comments are not directed at K-State or any school in particular but the "new process" in general!
With all due respect, that requires a hell of a lot more "experience" than flying a Katana around for a 1000 hours and all the "mentoring" in the world won't make up for it!
Note: My comments are not directed at K-State or any school in particular but the "new process" in general!
That's just the beginning. So you're right. That vs 1000 hours spinning circles just don't compare. And it's being recognized with this waiver.
#25
I very much agree! I don't like using total time because it isn't apples to apples. That being said, KSU has a CRJ700 FTD with which they do CRM training, Advanced aircraft systems training, and loft style flying in. In addition, they use bonanzas for complex and barons for multi. They also have a C90 which the students get to fly right seat in for KSU faculty transportation.
That's just the beginning. So you're right. That vs 1000 hours spinning circles just don't compare. And it's being recognized with this waiver.
That's just the beginning. So you're right. That vs 1000 hours spinning circles just don't compare. And it's being recognized with this waiver.
#27
For the average instructor that may be exaggerated a bit, however the instructor/professor who teaches a lot of the advanced classes has several years in the airlines on the CRJ and Saab.
#28
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 46
I'm a graduate of a school similar to K state and the school applied for its exemption as well. I fall right into the R-ATP window (1100TT, 115ME) and have received job offers from some regionals.
I know the prevailing opinion is the college is no substitute for experience, and I agree with that partially. But 6 years ago I couldn't keep an instructor for my commercial MEL because they were all getting to be 250 hour pilots leaving for the airlines.
Is anyone in the same boat as me?
I know the prevailing opinion is the college is no substitute for experience, and I agree with that partially. But 6 years ago I couldn't keep an instructor for my commercial MEL because they were all getting to be 250 hour pilots leaving for the airlines.
Is anyone in the same boat as me?
#29
I'm a graduate of a school similar to K state and the school applied for its exemption as well. I fall right into the R-ATP window (1100TT, 115ME) and have received job offers from some regionals.
I know the prevailing opinion is the college is no substitute for experience, and I agree with that partially. But 6 years ago I couldn't keep an instructor for my commercial MEL because they were all getting to be 250 hour pilots leaving for the airlines.
Is anyone in the same boat as me?
I know the prevailing opinion is the college is no substitute for experience, and I agree with that partially. But 6 years ago I couldn't keep an instructor for my commercial MEL because they were all getting to be 250 hour pilots leaving for the airlines.
Is anyone in the same boat as me?
If a pilot had 250 hours and was exceptional then I would love to fly with him or her. However, this is the new standard and only time will tell if it produces "safer" pilots. I have my doubts for a number of reasons! Becoming an airline pilot has become financially out of reach for many. Hence, only military pilots, "rich kids" or those who are stupid enough to incur 6 digits worth of student loans will ever become airline pilots!
#30
Works Every Weekend
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
That kind of ad-hoc background (combined with the attention-to-detail military culture common at US airlines) is why US airline pilots are safer than any others IMO. We have a lot of people who are good sticks with real-world experience that European and Asian pilots don't have and will probably never get.
Low time pilots who are trained from day one for transport category operations tend to be good at programming the box and doing ILS approaches with a 5,700 NM straight-in final. Actually flying airplanes, not so much.
Low time pilots who are trained from day one for transport category operations tend to be good at programming the box and doing ILS approaches with a 5,700 NM straight-in final. Actually flying airplanes, not so much.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post