Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Two questions

Old 12-03-2006 | 05:54 PM
  #1  
CTPILOT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Up front
Default Two questions

I rencently just started flight instructing and curious where to find syllabus for instr, and comm so I can follow an organized course outline. Also I am beginning to buy multi time with a friend anyone know the proper way to log flight time I heard mix things. Thanks
Reply
Old 12-03-2006 | 06:22 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: DHC-6 / PC-12
Default

it would be easier if one of you had an MEI....
Reply
Old 12-03-2006 | 08:02 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
From: Sitting down and facing front. Why would you want to know that?
Default

Sporty's sent me a sample private syllabus a few months ago. It looked nice, better than the Jeppeson one that I use where I teach. Don't know about their instrument and commercial, but that is worth a try.

For logging multi, it is a lot better to get an MEI.
Reply
Old 12-03-2006 | 09:34 PM
  #4  
multipilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Default

Jepp syllabus for instrument/commercial is okay. You won't be able to follow it exactly though. I can almost 100% guarantee that an instrument student will need more than three flight lessons on holding procedures.

Get your MEI. I would advise that you do not log multi-time unless you are in the front seat manipulating the flight controls. I've heard of some really stupid ways that people, even though they argue are legal, log multi-time.

I have also heard that airline companies do not count multi-PIC as a safety pilot. A friend of my has an interview with ExpressJet. He was right at 100 hours but they DQed nearly 2 hours of it because it was as a multi-engine safety pilot. He still gets the interview but has to buy more multi-time to meet mins.
Reply
Old 12-04-2006 | 07:33 AM
  #5  
CTPILOT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Up front
Default

thanks alot for the information ....yeah my friend and I that are both splitting the time are both MEI's.
Reply
Old 12-04-2006 | 08:37 AM
  #6  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,923
Likes: 698
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by multipilot
I have also heard that airline companies do not count multi-PIC as a safety pilot. A friend of my has an interview with ExpressJet. He was right at 100 hours but they DQed nearly 2 hours of it because it was as a multi-engine safety pilot. He still gets the interview but has to buy more multi-time to meet mins.
Most don't have a problem with SP time, I had plenty and nobody ever said anything. You might check with the airlines you are interested in to find out for sure what their policies are.

But I wouldn't go buy an extra 50 hour$ of twin time unless you really need to...
Reply
Old 12-04-2006 | 08:47 AM
  #7  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,923
Likes: 698
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Exclamation

Originally Posted by CTPILOT
thanks alot for the information ....yeah my friend and I that are both splitting the time are both MEI's.

How are you splitting it?

Safety Pilot time is 100% legal and commonly done.

But if you are taking turns giving each other dual on cross-country legs, that is NOT legal and could bite you in the butt. Even though the regs may not cleary state it, the FAA has consistently held that dual is only allowed for legitimate instructional purposes such as:
-Rating/Cert
-BFR
-IPC
-Aircraft Checkout
-Area/ Route familiarization

It would be impossible to make a case for dual-given if you were taking turns giving it to each other in the same airplane! If you are qualified to GIVE dual on a flight, you obviously have no need to receive dual on the return leg! If it's a one-time thing, sure go-ahead nobody would have an issue with that (call it a fam flight).

I'm not sure how the airlines feel about dual-given time building, but I would avoid it just based on the FAA issue. safety Pilot is the "accepted" loophole to share twin time!
Reply
Old 12-04-2006 | 09:46 AM
  #8  
LAfrequentflyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
Default

How exactly does safety pilot time work?

One pilot flies with the foggles and the other watches for traffic along the way? On the return leg pilots switch roles?

Also. The safety pilot would log a few minutes less time due to pilot flying the first leg would not be able to use foggles to taxi and takeoff. I assume at 300 feet or so the foggles go on...

-LAFF
Reply
Old 12-04-2006 | 10:15 AM
  #9  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,923
Likes: 698
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by LAfrequentflyer
How exactly does safety pilot time work?

One pilot flies with the foggles and the other watches for traffic along the way? On the return leg pilots switch roles?

Also. The safety pilot would log a few minutes less time due to pilot flying the first leg would not be able to use foggles to taxi and takeoff. I assume at 300 feet or so the foggles go on...

-LAFF
You are correct. The industry standard is that the SP deducts 0.3 per leg to account for the hood being off for taxi, TO, and LDG. Example:

1.0 Hour Flight
Joe: Pilot (under the hood)
Jack: SP

Joe logs 1.0 TT, 0.7 simulated IFR, the approache(s) and the LDG.
Jack logs 0.7 TT.

To maximize shareable time, you normally fly all approaches to the missed except for the last one, which terminates in a LDG.
Reply
Old 12-04-2006 | 10:27 AM
  #10  
LAfrequentflyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
You are correct. The industry standard is that the SP deducts 0.3 per leg to account for the hood being off for taxi, TO, and LDG. Example:

1.0 Hour Flight
Joe: Pilot (under the hood)
Jack: SP

Joe logs 1.0 TT, 0.7 simulated IFR, the approache(s) and the LDG.
Jack logs 0.7 TT.

To maximize shareable time, you normally fly all approaches to the missed except for the last one, which terminates in a LDG.

Good. Thanks...So to recap...SP is legit if done correctly - see above.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
palgia841
Career Questions
128
01-27-2008 11:41 AM
MX727
Cargo
32
09-11-2006 09:09 PM
PinnacleFO
Regional
13
08-04-2006 05:36 PM
mistarose
Flight Schools and Training
1
06-07-2006 08:38 PM
CitationJason
Regional
6
01-17-2006 02:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices