![]() |
Originally Posted by krudawg
(Post 1724338)
I'd bet you have a line out the door of admiring pilots in need of a top-notch Flight Review.
|
Originally Posted by ChinookDriver47
(Post 1724236)
Semantics. That's like calling an engine a powerplant. It has nothing to do with the quality of the instruction or review. Spare me your superiority complex. Thanks to everyone else for not being a ****. How can I trust you, why should I pay you, to get me current on the regs when it's obvious you're not current yourself?!? Good luck, Orville. Your students must love the refresher on wing warping. ;) . |
Originally Posted by TonyC
(Post 1724450)
they are both current, valid terms. BFR is not.
Again...just because. |
No, you're a **** for coming across as a ****.
What would have been wrong with saying "hey man, check your 6 on your terminology, real quick. I know people still use BFR, but is actually called FR, and has been for some time now" Instead of coming across like a spoiled jerk with a Napoleon complex on the internet behind a keyboard? I would have received a more professional response from SkyHigh. Answer: Nothing. So, thanks for the information despite being snide. Noted. |
Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes
(Post 1724484)
|
they are both current, valid terms. BFR is not.
this is obviously the only thing that matters when figuring how much to charge for a bfr instead of just charging your normal rate and being done with it. lets ask everyones opinion rather than use logic and not start the thread to begin with. |
Originally Posted by ChinookDriver47
(Post 1724487)
... Instead of coming across like a spoiled jerk with a Napoleon complex on the internet behind a keyboard? I would have received a more professional response from SkyHigh. Answer: Nothing. So, thanks for the information despite being snide. Noted. I'm sorry I hurt your feelings, Orville. ;) Have fun teaching. . |
I absolutely will, Wilbur.
|
Originally Posted by Ewfflyer
(Post 1724373)
Maybe and maybe not. People who respect the process and actually are looking for more than just the quick run through. There are people like that. Usually higher classes of airframes coincide with this, as their general budget offers more. I charge $500/person when giving annual insurance training in a few aircraft that fall into this group, never had anyone even hesitate at the price.(which means I might need to up the rate:cool: )
|
Originally Posted by TonyC
(Post 1724510)
So, basically, you agree I was correct, but you got your feelings hurt because your were corrected.
I'm sorry I hurt your feelings, Orville. ;) Have fun teaching. .
Originally Posted by ChinookDriver47
(Post 1724524)
I absolutely will, Wilbur.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:43 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands