Search
Notices
Foreign Airlines that hire U.S. pilots

Air France 447

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2009, 05:45 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dn_wisconsin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 1,114
Default

Originally Posted by sjsanford View Post
What is the primary evidence of turbulence for this flight? The AF press release on its web site says "The aircraft hit a zone of stormy weather with strong turbulence" -- this is being interpreted by the press that the aircraft actually experienced turbulence. But has AF cited primary evidence? Was there an actual radio comm from the crew indicating turbulence? I can't seem to find that. Can anyone find primary-source quotes/data that clearly state the plane hit turbulence?
The bus tells on you all by itself. It sends messages to Airbus in France and to your company automatically about every factor of your flight. So my guess is sometime over the ocean it sent a message about what the plane was going through and I mean EVERYTHING is sent back to Airbus and the company. At Spirit we have someone in SOC that watches the messages and pays real close attention to when something red pops up.
dn_wisconsin is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 06:27 PM
  #82  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default


Wow.



12345678910.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 06:32 PM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Fero's
Posts: 472
Default

Originally Posted by wrxpilot View Post
Actually, I don't think there's been a single CFIT accident with a GPWS equipped aircraft.
There have been a number of accidents that have occurred while "whoop whoop pull up" was sounding. Two that I can come up with, off the top of my head, that were CFIT.
chuckyt1 is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 06:35 PM
  #84  
Line Holder
 
Pharo351's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 38
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs View Post
A couple of nights ago at FL370 about to start our descent into Newark from MCI via the PHLBO 2 I pulled the power back and in a matter of seconds cabin altitude went from 7,800ft to 9,100ft on our way to quickly losing pressurization, we donned our masks informed ATC and DROPPED from 37,000 ft to 10,000 ft somewhere over Slate Run in a matter of minutes, we had no other choice to descend, and we had to descend into a wide are of Thunderstorms, if these thunderstorms where more severe, what could we have done?, pretty much no way out, but down and through, something similar could have happened to this airplane, only on a much more dire level, such as explosive depressurization, as well as descending into MUCH MORE SEVER THUNDERSTORMS.

I dunno, I guess we will have to wait and see
What were you late for your commute or something? You mean no other options, other than leveling off, adding power therby restoreing pressurization and diverting to your alternate? I don't know your full circumstances, just busting your chops brother!
Pharo351 is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 06:40 PM
  #85  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: Airdesk
Posts: 31
Default

Throughout my years of flying Airbus, I have developed a few relationships at Airbus Industries and decided to inquire about AFR 447. I was told this information earlier today.

"The on-board maintenance system initially sent a message about an electrical circuit malfunction followed by data indicating a pressurization problem. The next message was a final message. A final message is described as an all out system and aircraft status message that is sent before the airplane loses electrical power and goes to Batteries Only".

I have flown in and out of Brazil during the summer, and I can tell you that if they encountered weather, it is nothing what you see in the US. Thunderstorms in and around Brazil have tops that reach FL 510 and they are nasty. If they did indeed ditch NE of the Archipilegos, and the aircraft sank, there are depths there that range between 9866 ft and 14000 ft. That will make the recovery of the flight data difficult.

My prayers are with AFR 447.
xtreme_jetlag is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 06:44 PM
  #86  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

I don't understand, I avoid yellow as much as we can, and red is a nono, do you guys in these heavier airplanes usually plow through cells showing moderate to extremer precip?, what would be the reason for trying to make it through a thunderstorm (if this in fact what happened). 12 minutes of Severe turbulence must have been an absolute nightmare
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 06:46 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: retired
Posts: 992
Wink

Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs View Post
A couple of nights ago at FL370 about to start our descent into Newark from MCI via the PHLBO 2 I pulled the power back and in a matter of seconds cabin altitude went from 7,800ft to 9,100ft on our way to quickly losing pressurization, we donned our masks informed ATC and DROPPED from 37,000 ft to 10,000 ft somewhere over Slate Run in a matter of minutes, we had no other choice to descend, and we had to descend into a wide are of Thunderstorms, if these thunderstorms where more severe, what could we have done?, pretty much no way out, but down and through, something similar could have happened to this airplane, only on a much more dire level, such as explosive depressurization, as well as descending into MUCH MORE SEVER THUNDERSTORMS.

I dunno, I guess we will have to wait and see
You probably could have saved yourself a lot of trouble by just pushing the throttles up.
Dougdrvr is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 06:46 PM
  #88  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Originally Posted by Pharo351 View Post
What were you late for your commute or something? You mean no other options, other than leveling off, adding power therby restoreing pressurization and diverting to your alternate? I don't know your full circumstances, just busting your chops brother!

haha, the outflow valve pretty much gave up when we reduced power so max power may have kept it working properly but then we wouldn't have been able to descend , but yea keeping max power may have fixed the problem

Also it was a minute or two after we pulled the power back that it happened, and when I saw the cabin altitude climb and turn amber, getting my mask on and dropping to 10,000 ft was my only concern, but I know for the future, ya live and ya learn
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 07:02 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: retired
Posts: 992
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs View Post
haha, the outflow valve pretty much gave up when we reduced power so max power may have kept it working properly but then we wouldn't have been able to descend , but yea keeping max power may have fixed the problem

Also it was a minute or two after we pulled the power back that it happened, and when I saw the cabin altitude climb and turn amber, getting my mask on and dropping to 10,000 ft was my only concern, but I know for the future, ya live and ya learn
It's an old 707 trick, some were so "leaky" that you had to descend with 1,2,4 at idle and 3 about half power. (but it never hurts to put your mask on while trying it. It comes off as easy as it went on)
Dougdrvr is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 07:11 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SpyGlass's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: ATL FO
Posts: 133
Default

Originally Posted by Rather B Fishin View Post
Does anyone know the range of the DCVR or DFDR beacon? How deep can they be and still be able to hear them?
I've read the beacons are certified to operate at up to 20,000 feet of water, and transmit up to 30-days at that depth. The Atlantic has depths can reach more than 25,000 feet though. Although this is the case, a signal could be affected though by obstructions such as dirt, silt, or airplane wreckage.

I feel for everyone affected by this...
SpyGlass is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tr disagree
Hangar Talk
1
06-26-2009 08:55 PM
andy171773
Major
56
06-22-2009 12:48 PM
HectorD
Hangar Talk
2
06-01-2009 07:57 AM
ol'tigerguy
Cargo
8
02-24-2009 03:29 PM
cencal83406
Regional
17
02-03-2009 07:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices