Search

Notices
Foreign Airlines that hire U.S. pilots

TAX Time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2013 | 01:30 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: A320/CAP
Default TAX Time

Hello ALL.
On another thread; I was told if you fly another country aircraft registration, you can include the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion (FEIE) to that income while over International Water.
I have checked with two Tax accountants and the answer from both was NO.
Be careful; you are GUILTY until proven INNOCENT in regards to the IRS.
Reply
Old 04-13-2013 | 05:27 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
From: The Far Side
Default

If you take tax advice from anywhere on the "Internet", without checking with a competent tax advisor, you deserve to be found "guilty". Stupid is as stupid does, Forrest.

Also, you're guilty (for all practical purposes) until proven innocent in all administrative law - not just with IRS (and FAA).
Reply
Old 04-13-2013 | 06:03 AM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
From: tri current
Default

The whole thing is a crock of shi?.

The point of the Foreign earned income exclusion is that you shouldn't have to pay taxes for services you are not receiving. If you are living and working overseas you are not using:

1) U.S. schools
2) U.S. roads
3) Any U.S. social services
4) Police and Fire departments
5) etc, etc, etc

So this whole interpretation by the IRS is fundamentally flawed. If someone would spend the dollars to challenge them in court I would wager that the challenge would be successful.

They are just playing games with the wording since the wording states you must be in a foreign country.

For the people who have been audited on this they have gone to great lengths to show that their percentage of working time spent over international waters is negligible.

One guy I know had this audit when he was an F.O.. He wasn't going to pay any tax since his total income was well under the limit. After caluculating that 7% of his work time was over international waters he was still under the cap. So the IRS agent spent a fair amount of time on this and earned the U.S. government exactly $0.


TP
Reply
Old 04-13-2013 | 06:20 AM
  #4  
The Dominican's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
From: 747 captain
Default

Is there any time that an audit on this been challenged that hasn't been won? All the instances that I have heard off have been won by the pilots.
Reply
Old 04-13-2013 | 10:15 AM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: A320/CAP
Default

Hey guys, I want to beleive as much as you that this interpretation is wrong. I will attaché the relative IRS ruling as soon as I can.
Dont kill the messenger. Thank You, happy weekend.
Reply
Old 04-13-2013 | 10:21 AM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: A320/CAP
Default

thanks rotor, I agree. All should take care in this issue. That is the reason I post this.
Reply
Old 04-13-2013 | 07:17 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: A320/CAP
Default

U.S. Citizens Performing Services in Foreign and International Airspace

check this out.
Reply
Old 04-13-2013 | 10:27 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Default

Has anyone looked up the official definitions of "services" etc in the IRC? Scattered throughout the 70,000+ pages of their convoluted code are words and catch phrases that are defined into specific definitions that do not suggest the obvious, and most of us do not fit their definition to tax us. Without going into too much detail, I didnt know we were "officers of a corporation" or "employees of the federal government" among other phrases they use to trick everyone into handing over all their money, bla bla bla. It makes for an interesting read, yet there is not much anyone can do about it unless youre lucky.
Reply
Old 04-14-2013 | 03:45 AM
  #9  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default

I am going through this exact scenario about flight time over international water right now. Another pilot from my legacy US airline went through it last year. We both flew for an asian carrier for a couple of years. He won his battle.

We get a letter from the IRS stating that 100 percent of our foreign income exclusion was denied because we were flying over water. It was 2-3 years prior so they tacked on penalties and 40% interest per year.
They claim it was "just to get our attention.

I had never heard of this, but the info they gave me says that any flight over international waters, outside of 3 miles from land, is US earned income, even on a foreign flagged carrier. I had to copy my logbooks and calculate time spent over international water.

Luckily only a very small amount (2% and 7%) of the two years was over water. I made enough that I should not owe any additional tax.

IRS Pr&$%cks.
Reply
Old 04-14-2013 | 12:20 PM
  #10  
Are we there yet??!!
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Default

That is why is pays to have a good tax accountant/lawyer when doing expat work.
The guy I use has had to re-educated the IRS on their rules more than once.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
teejay
Flight Schools and Training
11
06-17-2008 10:10 AM
machz990
Cargo
43
08-05-2007 11:00 AM
MaxKts
Cargo
25
08-02-2007 03:40 AM
CashMcL
Hangar Talk
9
09-14-2006 11:19 AM
SWAjet
Money Talk
0
03-30-2005 10:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices