Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Foreign
Tax issues to be aware of! >

Tax issues to be aware of!

Search
Notices
Foreign Airlines that hire U.S. pilots

Tax issues to be aware of!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2016, 07:11 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
NEDude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,067
Default

Originally Posted by iflysky View Post
This comes directly from IRS Pub. 54 (pg.34 QnA)

" 5) My U.S. employer pays my salary into my U.S. bank account. Is this income considered earned in the United States or is it considered foreign earned income?

If you performed the services to earn this salary outside the United States, your salary is considered earned abroad. It does not matter that you are paid by a U.S. employer or that your salary is deposited in a U.S. bank account in the United States. The source of salary, wages, commissions, and other personal service income is the place where you perform the services. "

However, despite the above provision, I still strongly recomend consulting a professional CPA or an attorney specializing in foreign taxes. Everyone's situation is different and can be interpreted differently by the IRS.
The wording here is very interesting. It clearly states in this publication that if the money is earned outside the United States then it qualifies as foreign earned income. But the practice has been that only money earned in a foreign country counts. The difference being that in this publication you could make the case that money earned in international airspace should count for the foreign earned income exclusion because it is earned outside the United States. Of course this is the IRS/US government we are talking about here, so conflicting information should be no surprise..
NEDude is offline  
Old 01-18-2016, 07:18 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: tri current
Posts: 1,485
Default

Originally Posted by NEDude View Post
The wording here is very interesting. It clearly states in this publication that if the money is earned outside the United States then it qualifies as foreign earned income. But the practice has been that only money earned in a foreign country counts. The difference being that in this publication you could make the case that money earned in international airspace should count for the foreign earned income exclusion because it is earned outside the United States. Of course this is the IRS/US government we are talking about here, so conflicting information should be no surprise..

"International waters" is not a foreign country. That is the IRS position that is causing so many audits of expat pilots. Truly petty and not in the spirit of the foreign earned income exclusion, but it's the U.S. government so I guess we shouldn't expect much else.


TP
Typhoonpilot is offline  
Old 01-19-2016, 04:55 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
NEDude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,067
Default

Originally Posted by Typhoonpilot View Post
"International waters" is not a foreign country. That is the IRS position that is causing so many audits of expat pilots. Truly petty and not in the spirit of the foreign earned income exclusion, but it's the U.S. government so I guess we shouldn't expect much else.


TP
But "International Waters" is "outside the United States". Like I said, the wording in the IRS publication contradicts the practice of the IRS.
NEDude is offline  
Old 01-19-2016, 11:13 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: B767 FO
Posts: 125
Default

Originally Posted by NEDude View Post
But "International Waters" is "outside the United States". Like I said, the wording in the IRS publication contradicts the practice of the IRS.
Pg.13 same doc.

"To meet the bona fide residence test or the physical presence test, you must live in or be present in a foreign country. A foreign country includes any territory under the sovereignty of a government other than that of the United States.
The term “foreign country” includes the country's airspace and territorial waters, but not international waters and the airspace above."
iflysky is offline  
Old 01-19-2016, 07:36 PM
  #25  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Originally Posted by Typhoonpilot View Post
"International waters" is not a foreign country. That is the IRS position that is causing so many audits of expat pilots. Truly petty and not in the spirit of the foreign earned income exclusion, but it's the U.S. government so I guess we shouldn't expect much else.


TP
When I first heard about this (my first audit 3 years ago) I thought it was a mistake, and still do. I believe it should be "on or over international waters in a US flagged vessel or aircraft". Any flagged vessel or aircraft is legally a little slice of the home country, and has special rights, no matter where it sits in the world. I don't think being over international water in a Chinese or UAE flagged aircraft should count as US income.

My current audit did not include this. It is just a determination of whether I was a contractor or employee. But the instructions for a form I used includes the term US flagged vessel or aircraft. I will try to find it and post it.

I worked with about 30+ americans at two jobs. All but a couple have been audited. Some twice, including me. After the first one they sent me a check for 600 or 700 dollars. This time they will just owe me a bunch more in foreign tax credits. Still a PITA
Probe is offline  
Old 01-22-2016, 11:17 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,339
Default

Originally Posted by got2fly View Post
There is no news here. You can live overseas, but if you are employed in the USA there is no foreign earned income exemption because it is not foreign earned income! I lived and worked overseas and had the foreign earned income exemption...
..There is no mystery here. Just follow the rules. Turbotax basic or H&R Block basic software or will keep you out of trouble.
Read the post again. Yes, there's definitely news here and your situation had nothing to do with what the flight attendant was trying to achieve.

"...The second issue at hand is that the Supreme Court refused to hear the case of an United flight attendant, who is an American citizen and based in Hong Kong, who attempted to claim the foreign income exclusion for all of her income.."


She merely wanted the US to treat foreign income the way most of of the world does. The US is one of very few countries where - as long as you're a citizen - you have to pay US income taxes (above the exclusion) no matter what. ..of course, since that person lives in another country, often permanently, he or she also pays taxes there..

For example - let's say you were born in the US and as a child moved to Canada, have lived there your entire life, paid taxes there, got married there, are a permanent resident ("green card" holder) or even a citizen there and have no plans of ever moving to the US - as long as you have a US passport - you have to pay US income tax (above the exclusion).
That's what this flight attendant was trying to challenge. Most countries allow you to keep your citizenship and won't charge you taxes even if you choose to live somewhere else permanently as long as you don't use their benefits (health care, pension, etc.) you shouldn't have to surrender your US passport to avoid paying US taxes.

From the article below:
Unlike most countries, the U.S. taxes citizens on all income, no matter where it is earned or where they live..

http://money.cnn.com/2015/05/08/pf/t...orts-renounce/

Last edited by whalesurfer; 01-22-2016 at 11:29 PM.
whalesurfer is offline  
Old 01-23-2016, 12:50 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 151
Default

Out of curiosity, does there seem to be a region or airline where most of the IRS audits are focused? I have been working in Japan for 7 years and have not heard of too many guys here being audited.
aupilot is offline  
Old 01-23-2016, 06:19 PM
  #28  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Originally Posted by whalesurfer View Post
Read the post again. Yes, there's definitely news here and your situation had nothing to do with what the flight attendant was trying to achieve.

"...The second issue at hand is that the Supreme Court refused to hear the case of an United flight attendant, who is an American citizen and based in Hong Kong, who attempted to claim the foreign income exclusion for all of her income.."


She merely wanted the US to treat foreign income the way most of of the world does. The US is one of very few countries where - as long as you're a citizen - you have to pay US income taxes (above the exclusion) no matter what. ..of course, since that person lives in another country, often permanently, he or she also pays taxes there..

For example - let's say you were born in the US and as a child moved to Canada, have lived there your entire life, paid taxes there, got married there, are a permanent resident ("green card" holder) or even a citizen there and have no plans of ever moving to the US - as long as you have a US passport - you have to pay US income tax (above the exclusion).
That's what this flight attendant was trying to challenge. Most countries allow you to keep your citizenship and won't charge you taxes even if you choose to live somewhere else permanently as long as you don't use their benefits (health care, pension, etc.) you shouldn't have to surrender your US passport to avoid paying US taxes.

From the article below:
Unlike most countries, the U.S. taxes citizens on all income, no matter where it is earned or where they live..

Record 1,335 Americans give up their passports - May. 8, 2015
Except for taxi time, almost of a HK based UA flight attendant would be "on over over international water".
Probe is offline  
Old 01-24-2016, 06:44 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,339
Default

Originally Posted by Probe View Post
Except for taxi time, almost of a HK based UA flight attendant would be "on over over international water".
What is your point? Did your read the article and the entire post? I think we're talking apples and oranges.. Simple put I'm not sure we're discussing the same issue here?
whalesurfer is offline  
Old 01-24-2016, 06:58 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
NEDude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,067
Default

Originally Posted by whalesurfer View Post
Read the post again. Yes, there's definitely news here and your situation had nothing to do with what the flight attendant was trying to achieve.

"...The second issue at hand is that the Supreme Court refused to hear the case of an United flight attendant, who is an American citizen and based in Hong Kong, who attempted to claim the foreign income exclusion for all of her income.."


She merely wanted the US to treat foreign income the way most of of the world does. The US is one of very few countries where - as long as you're a citizen - you have to pay US income taxes (above the exclusion) no matter what. ..of course, since that person lives in another country, often permanently, he or she also pays taxes there..

For example - let's say you were born in the US and as a child moved to Canada, have lived there your entire life, paid taxes there, got married there, are a permanent resident ("green card" holder) or even a citizen there and have no plans of ever moving to the US - as long as you have a US passport - you have to pay US income tax (above the exclusion).
That's what this flight attendant was trying to challenge. Most countries allow you to keep your citizenship and won't charge you taxes even if you choose to live somewhere else permanently as long as you don't use their benefits (health care, pension, etc.) you shouldn't have to surrender your US passport to avoid paying US taxes.

From the article below:
Unlike most countries, the U.S. taxes citizens on all income, no matter where it is earned or where they live..

Record 1,335 Americans give up their passports - May. 8, 2015
It makes being an expat American very difficult. Throw in the FATCA issues (closed bank accounts, denied mortgages, limited investment options) and it can be virtually impossible to move your life overseas if you are an American. You will always need to keep one foot in the States, even if you never plan to return. Your only option to live a normal life outside of the States is to relinquish or renounce your U.S. citizenship.
NEDude is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Whale Pilot
Cargo
486
12-28-2009 05:49 PM
SWAjet
Money Talk
2
04-15-2007 12:34 PM
vagabond
Money Talk
0
03-04-2007 11:17 AM
ImperialxRat
Major
17
03-01-2007 08:03 AM
SWAjet
Money Talk
0
03-30-2005 10:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices