Search
Notices

Airbus FCOM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2019, 07:02 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
Default

Originally Posted by NWSteeringArmer View Post
Airlines use different procedures to keep uniformity across the fleet if they have multiple types... we say “flaps zero, after take off check”... delta says “slats retract”... they say that on airbus and boeing to keep transition between types easier and more fluid... I have no idea why us, allegiant, jetblue and spirit would have different procedures or calls
Allegiant and Jetblue both operate different types.
vessbot is offline  
Old 08-03-2019, 07:03 PM
  #12  
Qbicle seat warmer
 
ASpilot2be's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: SAAB FO
Posts: 1,177
Default

Originally Posted by vessbot View Post
Allegiant and Jetblue both operate different types.
I don't think Allegiant does. They're all Airbus now I believe.
ASpilot2be is offline  
Old 08-03-2019, 07:06 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
Default

Originally Posted by ASpilot2be View Post
I don't think Allegiant does. They're all Airbus now I believe.
I stand corrected, I didn't realize the MD's were gone already.
vessbot is offline  
Old 08-04-2019, 09:51 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 272
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine View Post
The truth is, most airlines have way more data than the manufacturer. Airlines conduct more flights with a greater variety of pilots (not a small team of test pilots). If a procedure isn't working well, an airline will discover it long before the manufacturer.

The goal of the manufacturer isn't to produce the best procedures, it is to produce procedures that work for that specific aircraft. Sometimes the specific manufacturer procedures conflict with an airline's general operating philosophy.
I have operated the Bus for 13 years. 320/330/340 with an US ULCC, a ME3 carrier and now a legacy. With all due respect, I couldn't disagree more with you. Airbus FCOM all day. Both the ULCC, the legacy (I also have the B6 QRH) manuals are full of mistakes and omissions. My current company is actually paying me to do an audit of our "QRH" (which by the way cant be called a QRH anymore if it contains ALL the abnormal procedures) because they realized they have drifted so far away from Airbus it has become a massive liability. Airlines will never have the amount of data collected by a manufacturer. how many 320's were sold over 30 years? 7000? Every time there is a problem, the manufacturer will hear about it and make a change if needed. Airlines who decide to go their own way don't necessarily benefit from the latest updates. Unless they spend a lot of money keeping their manuals up to date. And they don't.
You can make a few changes. Most Airbus operators do. But why reinvent the wheel? Why say "all green" instead of "no blue"?
Why would you force land a 320 after a dual engine failure at flap 3 when the manufacturer tells you its better at flap 2?
Or why do I have to switch on the emergency lights prior to shutting down the engines when doing an evacuation?

Last edited by cynicalaviator; 08-04-2019 at 10:17 AM.
cynicalaviator is offline  
Old 08-04-2019, 09:58 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 272
Default

Originally Posted by NWSteeringArmer View Post
Airlines use different procedures to keep uniformity across the fleet if they have multiple types... we say “flaps zero, after take off check”... delta says “slats retract”... they say that on airbus and boeing to keep transition between types easier and more fluid... I have no idea why us, allegiant, jetblue and spirit would have different procedures or calls
Even that is a bad idea. I have to say "spoilers up" after an RTO instead of "Rev or no Rev, decel or no decel", because it's relevant to some ancient airplane in our fleet. it's useless to an airbus operator to know whether the spoilers are deployed or not on an RTO. But to make a transition easier, we have that nonsensical call out instead of call outs which give us a clue as to what needs to be the corrective action.
if a pilot has to make a transition from a 1960 airplane to a 320, not having to learn "reverse, decel" instead of "spoilers up" is going to make his/her life easier?
cynicalaviator is offline  
Old 08-05-2019, 09:39 AM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 69
Default

NW Steering is correct. Other airlines do things to keep standardization company wide. F9 makes changes for the sake of changes or for a new person to make their mark. To only change it back.


Originally Posted by Aero1900 View Post
I may be a bit of a nerd, but I'm not such a nerd that I spend my free time studying the differences between the FCOM and our SOPs.

However, I have always found it interesting how much leeway airlines have to operate their aircraft differently from how the manufacturer recommends. How and why airlines just make up their own procedures has always kind of baffled me. Seems to me, every airline should operate more or less the same. But I've been on other airlines jumpseats and not really been sure what the heck they were doing. On a plane I'm typed in
Flymonkey10 is offline  
Old 08-06-2019, 06:28 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 491
Default

Originally Posted by Flymonkey10 View Post
NW Steering is correct. Other airlines do things to keep standardization company wide. F9 makes changes for the sake of changes or for a new person to make their mark. To only change it back.
Quoted for truth.

Reference our most recent “Tiger Team” changes. Same 4 items on the after takeoff (silent) checklist and they rearranged the order. Why? Numerous examples of checklists with the same stuff and a different order.

Has anyone noticed that we can’t land or takeoff on “narrow” runways anymore?
OpenClimb is offline  
Old 08-06-2019, 07:27 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 514
Default

Originally Posted by OpenClimb View Post
Quoted for truth.

Reference our most recent “Tiger Team” changes. Same 4 items on the after takeoff (silent) checklist and they rearranged the order. Why? Numerous examples of checklists with the same stuff and a different order.

Has anyone noticed that we can’t land or takeoff on “narrow” runways anymore?

We can for another day.
RustyChain is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ToiletDuck
Major
4
09-08-2009 01:06 AM
andy171773
Major
56
06-22-2009 12:48 PM
Outlaw2097
Hangar Talk
1
05-08-2009 09:50 AM
vagabond
Technical
11
04-03-2007 05:52 AM
Sir James
Hangar Talk
0
08-07-2005 11:40 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices