Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Frontier (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/frontier/)
-   -   Proposal for 14 new ground gates in DEN (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/frontier/137284-proposal-14-new-ground-gates-den.html)

Aero1900 04-19-2022 07:18 PM


Originally Posted by buzzer (Post 3408892)
I'd like to see that math. If true then F9 would be wiping UA off the map in the U.S.

Frontier casm is 8 cents, United is 14 cents.

But United generates a lot more revenue per passenger

buzzer 04-20-2022 03:51 AM


Originally Posted by Aero1900 (Post 3408922)
Frontier casm is 8 cents, United is 14 cents.

But United generates a lot more revenue per passenger

How much more revenue and how much on the A320 plus load factor is at least what else is needed to do the math I guess. Comparing airline CASM isn't enough.

DumboDrop 04-20-2022 05:59 AM


Originally Posted by buzzer (Post 3409031)
How much more revenue and how much on the A320 plus load factor is at least what else is needed to do the math I guess. Comparing airline CASM isn't enough.

Wat?

CASM is the industry standard on measuring cost.

Bluedriver 04-20-2022 06:06 AM


Originally Posted by DumboDrop (Post 3409102)
Wat?

CASM is the industry standard on measuring cost.

I can't tell if this is sarcasm or stupidity. It's an irrelevant stat without also understanding RASM. It's like trying to understand the value of a company knowing only the stock price at close on a Tuesday. Meaningless without more information.

Bluedriver 04-20-2022 06:07 AM


Originally Posted by Andy (Post 3408771)
... pulling up the numbers from the 2021 annual reports
F9
CASM 8.10
RASM 7.67
UAL
CASM 14.36
PRASM 11.30 (passenger RASM)
TRASM 13.79 (total RASM)

I'd use UAL's PRASM, but they also have quite a bit of cargo revenues which is why the TRASM is 2 1/2 cents higher than PRASM. I couldn't find any cargo revenues in F9's annual report.
Both F9 and UAL are losing money on every seat mile flown, but F9 did a bit better than UAL in 2021 (.14 cents better per ASM)

I expect UAL's CASM to fall a bit in 2022 due to cuts in express flying. UAL didn't break out express numbers, but in previous filings, express CASM was considerably higher than mainline CASM.

RASM for both airlines should rise in 2022. UAL has the advantage of international markets opening up and a marked increase in business travel (based on what Delta stated in their Q1 earnings release). From Delta's earnings release:
Business travel recovery boosted by improvement in corporate: Domestic corporate sales* for the quarter were ~50 percent recovered, with March improving to ~70 percent versus 2019. International corporate sales for the quarter were ~35 percent recovered, with March improving to ~50 percent versus 2019. Internationally, Transatlantic improved the most as European countries reopened.
• Premium cabin revenue recovery outpacing Main Cabin: Premium products continued to lead the recovery with Domestic premium revenue approximately 100 percent restored to 2019 levels in the month of March. Domestic and Latin premium product revenue recovery outpaced Main Cabin by approximately 10 points during the March quarter.

Neither F9 nor UAL have posted Q1 earnings yet.

As another RASM comparison, in 2019, F9 had a RASM of 8.92 and UAL had a TRASM of 15.18 (PRASM of 13.90)

Yes, F9 has a considerably lower CASM. But they also have a significantly lower RASM.
I could post that UAL's RASM is almost twice as much as F9's RASM, but it doesn't tell the full story. Same for just talking about CASM.

Save your breath, Frontier is gonna take over all our airlines, just ask them.

Aero1900 04-20-2022 06:08 AM


Originally Posted by buzzer (Post 3409031)
How much more revenue and how much on the A320 plus load factor is at least what else is needed to do the math I guess. Comparing airline CASM isn't enough.

If you go back 1 page, ANDY showed some further math.

There's really little point in digging too deep into the numbers as the two businesses are so different. Q1 financials should be out fairly soon I'd think. The most important thing right now for Pilots is keeping the business out of bankruptcy so the labor contracts don't get gutted or force us to take pay concessions. That doesn't appear to be on the horizon for Frontier or United thankfully.

DumboDrop 04-20-2022 06:37 AM


Originally Posted by Bluedriver (Post 3409109)
I can't tell if this is sarcasm or stupidity. It's an irrelevant stat without also understanding RASM. It's like trying to understand the value of a company knowing only the stock price at close on a Tuesday. Meaningless without more information.

That wasn't the question. Cost was the question at issue.

Bluedriver 04-20-2022 06:58 AM


Originally Posted by DumboDrop (Post 3409138)
That wasn't the question. Cost was the question at issue.

The post you responded to was about more than cost, and he was right, save the single comment about load factor. Otherwise he was spot on.

Andy 04-20-2022 07:19 AM


Originally Posted by buzzer (Post 3409031)
How much more revenue and how much on the A320 plus load factor is at least what else is needed to do the math I guess. Comparing airline CASM isn't enough.

PMFJI.
United doesn't break out CASM/PRASM/TRASM by specific aircraft. United used to break out the numbers by mainline and express, but no longer do that. So no one can give you a breakout of specific United fleets. Besides, the guppy (737) fleet is much larger at United than fifi (A319/320) fleet.


As far as RASM minus CASM (revenues minus costs), I did the math a page ago and both airlines are very close. F9 was slightly better in 2021. With the business traveler returning and most international markets (not China) reopening, I expect United to take a very slight lead in 2022 due to a pretty good uptick in RASM and shrinking regional outsourcing.

I haven't looked at load factors; if it's really that critical of a topic, one can pull both airlines' load factors out of each airline's quarterly/annual SEC filings.

Hopefully that answered your question.

DumboDrop 04-20-2022 07:38 AM


Originally Posted by Bluedriver (Post 3409156)
The post you responded to was about more than cost, and he was right, save the single comment about load factor. Otherwise he was spot on.

He was changing the subject. Aero made a statement, he said it was wrong and "needed to see the math". He then obfuscated by bringing up revenue and starting a whole other discussion when it he was shown the facts.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:13 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands