![]() |
How long for a contract?
It’s seems like senior captains in the 8-10 year range and FOs in the 1-2 year range are jumping ship faster than we could recruit them. Just wondering is there light at the end of the tunnel here or are we in full blown Stockholm? No airline got a contract under 3 years with the exception of UPS and their TA extension. Will we be the exception?
|
Originally Posted by DontStahl320
(Post 3684132)
It’s seems like senior captains in the 8-10 year range and FOs in the 1-2 year range are jumping ship faster than we could recruit them. Just wondering is there light at the end of the tunnel here or are we in full blown Stockholm? No airline got a contract under 3 years with the exception of UPS and their TA extension. Will we be the exception?
|
Originally Posted by DontStahl320
(Post 3684132)
It’s seems like senior captains in the 8-10 year range and FOs in the 1-2 year range are jumping ship faster than we could recruit them. Just wondering is there light at the end of the tunnel here or are we in full blown Stockholm? No airline got a contract under 3 years with the exception of UPS and their TA extension. Will we be the exception?
|
Most union guys I talk to are pretty intent on thinking it will be end of winter/early spring.
The company came to the table with stuff in hand. They are losing a lot of employees. Lots of money. Lots of investors starting to question them hard. Metrics are in the toilet. |
Originally Posted by spooldup
(Post 3684188)
Most union guys I talk to are pretty intent on thinking it will be end of winter/early spring.
The company came to the table with stuff in hand. They are losing a lot of employees. Lots of money. Lots of investors starting to question them hard. Metrics are in the toilet. |
Originally Posted by FlyingR6
(Post 3684206)
There is no way we get one that fast. Just no feasible way with these people.
|
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3684226)
Unfortunately I agree. Just add two years to the estimates
|
Originally Posted by madmax757
(Post 3684228)
I want to see the pictures of the new strike bus. There was a teaser about a month ago but haven’t seen anything since. Unless it’s in my mailbox with my lanyard :)
|
Originally Posted by spooldup
(Post 3684188)
Most union guys I talk to are pretty intent on thinking it will be end of winter/early spring.
The company came to the table with stuff in hand. They are losing a lot of employees. Lots of money. Lots of investors starting to question them hard. Metrics are in the toilet. |
Originally Posted by fivebyfive
(Post 3684233)
I heard the bus is going to have Wi-Fi so they can still get lightning fast flica alerts for premium.
|
Originally Posted by fivebyfive
(Post 3684233)
I heard the bus is going to have Wi-Fi so they can still get lightning fast flica alerts for premium.
|
5+ minimum
|
Originally Posted by ReserveCA
(Post 3684345)
5+ minimum
|
Originally Posted by Stayontarget
(Post 3684653)
129 aircraft out of 136 planned this year. 2037 pilots on Flica. Depending on how many pilots one thinks we need per airplane we are starting to get very close to understaffed. Then what? Then how long will this contract take?
|
Originally Posted by Stayontarget
(Post 3684653)
129 aircraft out of 136 planned this year. 2037 pilots on Flica. Depending on how many pilots one thinks we need per airplane we are starting to get very close to understaffed. Then what? Then how long will this contract take?
|
Originally Posted by Stayontarget
(Post 3684653)
129 aircraft out of 136 planned this year. 2037 pilots on Flica. Depending on how many pilots one thinks we need per airplane we are starting to get very close to understaffed. Then what? Then how long will this contract take?
|
Originally Posted by togaflaps
(Post 3684669)
How many are going to be down with engine issues or how many are going to be delayed? Last I heard yall are overstaffed from my f9 friends. I'm asking as I have a family member who just got hired at F9 and want to see what you all think. As for a contract I'd be surprised if it comes in less than 2 years. That would be one of the fastest full contracts negotiated, ever. I used to fly for an indigo company and I think I'm safe in saying they don't negotiate anything quickly.
edit: the previous engine issues involving P&W. Airbus delays are another story…. |
Originally Posted by Stayontarget
(Post 3684785)
Engine issues have 0% affect on us. Sometimes the god of revenue shines on a carrier.
edit: the previous engine issues involving P&W. Airbus delays are another story…. I thought spirit had issues with them, because their fleet is several years older. We just started getting ours back in November. |
Didn’t you guys just rush though a new contract or something last year? Or was that spirit or JetBlue. Only thing I remember was some garbage being slammed in for a merger?
|
Originally Posted by 6packSteamJedi
(Post 3684814)
Didn’t you guys just rush though a new contract or something last year?
|
Originally Posted by Stayontarget
(Post 3684785)
Engine issues have 0% affect on us. Sometimes the god of revenue shines on a carrier.
edit: the previous engine issues involving P&W. Airbus delays are another story…. I will try and find the article. |
Originally Posted by Salukipilot4590
(Post 3684815)
You're thinking of Spirit.
|
Originally Posted by 6packSteamJedi
(Post 3684842)
Thanks, I have a hard time keeping some of this stuff straight.
Everyone needs to understand what and why they did what they did. After the agreement to merge with JetBlue, and in an attempt to try and slow down attrition, Spirit and Management agreed to a quick little pay raise contract. It was really just an extension of their old contract with higher pay rates. It's a short term deal until a joint contract can be negotiated between B6/NK. If the merger is not approved by the DOJ, Spirit will immediately return to negotiate a new, full contract. Spirit agreed to a short term deal with very mediocre pay raises but with the promise of a future contract in the new future. (either a joint one with JetBlue or a full, new one if they stay independent) The problem for us is that Frontier will definitely look at those pay rates and say "that's your 'peer group' Everyone needs to be crystal clear that we can't look at those rates ($306/ hr for 12th year ca) as a comparison. The circumstances of their deal cannot be confused with what we are working towards. Obviously our union understands this but don't be surprised if we see a video from BL talking about Spirit and peer groups. Btw, Spirit has admitted that the contract (pay raises they gave) hasn't done much or anything to stem attrition. If Frontier wants to seriously show down the attrition, they will need to pay a market rate for pilots. |
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3684880)
If Frontier wants to seriously show down the attrition, they will need to pay a market rate for pilots.
|
Originally Posted by planejoe
(Post 3684909)
Very clear they are not serious as they asked for concessions on day 1 of negotiations.
|
The fact that there are some people here who honestly think that this will be a quick negotiation is completely laughable.
|
Originally Posted by turbojet28
(Post 3684999)
The fact that there are some people here who honestly think that this will be a quick negotiation is completely laughable.
|
Originally Posted by Powderkeg
(Post 3684974)
A concession implies giving something up without gaining anything else. Assuming you’re talking about swap/drop etc, they didn’t ask for a concession. They asked to bring us in line with the rest of the industry. Which is also what we are asking for in regards to pay and benefits. We can either accept industry standard pay and industry standard scheduling flexibility (or lack thereof) or accept less somewhere else to keep our flexibility. I’m not being a company sympathizer or Debbie-Downer but this is how a mediator is going to look at it.
|
Originally Posted by CantStayAway
(Post 3685183)
Valid points. For what it’s worth, IF I had to choose, I’d keep the flexibility. There are so many people here who have never flown 121 before that I’m nervous we may end up going to an industry standard reserve-based drop/swap (aka: DENIED). I’d personally prefer to keep our flexibility even if it came with a lower hourly rate. I don’t believe that it is as much of an issue as they make it out to be though. Until lately (due to all of the premium flying) when a pilot dropped a trip into open time it was sucked up within 30 seconds (yes literally).
Don't get me wrong, I LOVE the flexibility. But you can't put that in APC under the pay rates column. NO ONE IS COMING HERE for the flexibility. In fact, guys who have it are leaving. We need the RATES. We need to get paid - even if we have to give up some of the QoL items - just to be competitive w/ other airlines. Otherwise, we stagnate. And that wonderful flexibility is lessened by the fact that there are no upgrades, there's no open time and PAF is a desperate measure in the 11th hour that requires guys to be online 24/7 just to get it. Rates are king in this world. TBH, there really should be no reason why we can't have the rates AND the flexibility. Imagine a AA pilot leaving for F9... A competent CEO could manage this. Hell, he'd be PROUD to. |
Originally Posted by dracir1
(Post 3685494)
No no no!!!
Don't get me wrong, I LOVE the flexibility. But you can't put that in APC under the pay rates column. NO ONE IS COMING HERE for the flexibility. In fact, guys who have it are leaving. We need the RATES. We need to get paid - even if we have to give up some of the QoL items - just to be competitive w/ other airlines. Otherwise, we stagnate. And that wonderful flexibility is lessened by the fact that there are no upgrades, there's no open time and PAF is a desperate measure in the 11th hour that requires guys to be online 24/7 just to get it. Rates are king in this world. TBH, there really should be no reason why we can't have the rates AND the flexibility. Imagine a AA pilot leaving for F9... A competent CEO could manage this. Hell, he'd be PROUD to. |
Originally Posted by mrwizard0
(Post 3685596)
I came here for the flexibility. I turned down interviews at legacies because qol is more important to me than money. Keeping (hopefully improving) our flexibility is worth giving up money. Lots of money is useless if you aren’t able to be home with those you care about it. We should be able to get our pay rates real close to the legacies and keep the qol, but either way we need qol
if flexibility is so good, why do we have the attrition rate we have? |
Originally Posted by dracir1
(Post 3685607)
you may be truthful. Only problem is you’re a unicorn. Most others want what I want.
if flexibility is so good, why do we have the attrition rate we have? We must protect our QOL/flexibility while achieving pay rates in the ballpark of the legacies to stem attrition |
Originally Posted by dracir1
(Post 3685607)
you may be truthful. Only problem is you’re a unicorn. Most others want what I want.
if flexibility is so good, why do we have the attrition rate we have? |
Originally Posted by HacksawDuggan
(Post 3685636)
There’s two unicorns because I’m a no vote if we give up drop/swap.
Drop/swap is necessary. I’m a no voter if we lose that as well. But keeping it with subpar rates are gonna mean the same thing for our future - we won’t grow at all. |
Originally Posted by HacksawDuggan
(Post 3685636)
There’s two unicorns because I’m a no vote if we give up drop/swap.
|
Originally Posted by ReserveCA
(Post 3685662)
it is DENIED most of the time ………
|
Originally Posted by Bulldog319
(Post 3685673)
The company could care less about QOL, they want the bright shiny object (pay rates) that can be shown at recruiting events. Why give away something we want for something we both want?
Exactly right. Pilots need to stop worrying about the companies job to staff and grow. |
Originally Posted by HacksawDuggan
(Post 3685636)
There’s two unicorns because I’m a no vote if we give up drop/swap.
|
Originally Posted by mrwizard0
(Post 3685596)
I came here for the flexibility. I turned down interviews at legacies because qol is more important to me than money. Keeping (hopefully improving) our flexibility is worth giving up money. Lots of money is useless if you aren’t able to be home with those you care about it. We should be able to get our pay rates real close to the legacies and keep the qol, but either way we need qol
|
Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
(Post 3685665)
It could only be denied 4 (2 of 4 are even) of 30 days las captain for September right now and 2 of the next 6 for august. And las is a mess right now. That’s nowhere near most of the time. Stop trying to give away provisions please.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:29 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands