Gender and uniforms…
#51
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,899
Grasping at straws. I never hindered their right to exist. Someone existing is not something I stop. You can't even make a rational argument. I have to remind myself I'm dealing with a San Francisco voter, then it starts to make sense.
#53
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
A woman wants to be called her. You want to call her sweet cheeks, because that's how you were raised. Who's in the wrong? You are. Because she doesn't want to be referred to that way.
Is that also compelled speech? Are you oppressed because you can't make catcalls anymore in the workplace?
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
This is not the burn you think it is. And I don't live in SF. Keep reaching.
#55
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,899
Compelled speech is a really snazzy talking point, but it's nonsense.
A woman wants to be called her. You want to call her sweet cheeks, because that's how you were raised. Who's in the wrong? You are. Because she doesn't want to be referred to that way.
Is that also compelled speech? Are you oppressed because you can't make catcalls anymore in the workplace?
A woman wants to be called her. You want to call her sweet cheeks, because that's how you were raised. Who's in the wrong? You are. Because she doesn't want to be referred to that way.
Is that also compelled speech? Are you oppressed because you can't make catcalls anymore in the workplace?
#56
#57
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
I argue that this is exactly the same. You referring to someone as their dead gender is offensive and demeaning. Sorry you can't see the parallels.
#59
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
#60
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910