Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
USG Support to Ukraine >

USG Support to Ukraine

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

USG Support to Ukraine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2023, 05:24 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Pilot
Posts: 2,625
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB View Post
Classy. I very rarely have reason to disagree with a conservative, but when I do I’m shocked to get such an unhinged response right out of the left’s playbook. Pretty sure we agree on 99% of today’s issues…with friends like these, who needs liberals haha
So in your words “at any cost” you are ok with the US failing if it means Ukraine succeeds. Classy.
Red Forman is offline  
Old 10-01-2023, 05:29 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,803
Default

Originally Posted by Red Forman View Post
So in your words “at any cost” you are ok with the US failing if it means Ukraine succeeds. Classy.
We both know I meant monetarily, and what pain that might cause would be worth it.
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 10-01-2023, 05:49 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bestglide's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: 756 left...
Posts: 442
Default

Originally Posted by Extenda View Post
the border has been in a state of quasi-insecurity for 200 years. it’s a political football both sides toss around to scare the other side when they want to win elections.

what does “secure” even mean? It’s an impossible goal.

Supporting Ukraine in every way possible should be a rare bipartisan stance. An autocrat who hates everything we stand for and wants to re-ignite the Cold War is trying to bulldoze a tiny nascent democracy who has close ties to us. The fact that it’s failing while the world is watching has given us a tremendous amount of soft power, and further reinvigorated Western unity.

Every dollar spent there is a far better investment than the trillions of sunk cost we’ve dropped into the sandpit.

it’s nuts that some Americans are neutral or tacitly pro-Russia in this whole shebang.
it’s nuts that we won’t take care of our own problems at home especially the border which by the way was under control just 2 years ago. Unfortunately the Ukraine has morphed into a money laundering opportunity for many of our political elites (both sides) and has become a never ending money trough that needs to stop until full accountability can be met….
Bestglide is offline  
Old 10-01-2023, 06:07 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 824
Default

Originally Posted by Bestglide View Post
it’s nuts that we won’t take care of our own problems at home especially the border which by the way was under control just 2 years ago. Unfortunately the Ukraine has morphed into a money laundering opportunity for many of our political elites (both sides) and has become a never ending money trough that needs to stop until full accountability can be met….
What metrics are you using for “under control” what does that even mean?
Extenda is offline  
Old 10-01-2023, 06:49 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,912
Default

Folks… It’s a proxy war. A proxy which much more less costly to igniting a war, with our involvement, overseas. Not just $$$$ but potential loss of life. Too bad… the Speaker, who is taking a victory lap for the vote, reneged on the deal made earlier this year. Such a dishonorable possum breath weakling who can’t reclaim his balls out of the pockets of… well, out of respect of the rules of APC no names shall be mentioned.
captjns is offline  
Old 10-01-2023, 06:57 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,595
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
No, there's no "aggressive expansion. It's just other nations joining of their own free will and volition. I wonder why.
Perhaps they were referring to NATO staying around after the Soviet Union collapsed even though it was promised it would be dissolved when the Warsaw Pact was? Or maybe they are referring to NATOs involvement in Egypt and other places in the mid-east? Or maybe they are referring to NATO's involvement in the Balkan conflict in the 90's? All of which was well outside of its charter. No wonder Putin is nervous and wants to ensure he has access to warm water and put a buffer between him and NATO. Can't say I blame him. Doesn't make it right, but his actions are predictable and justifiable based on NATO's actions.
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 10-01-2023, 06:59 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,595
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB View Post
If Ukraine goes, the next shooting war will be us right alongside NATO - we need Ukraine to win and at any cost.
Hmmm.... not sure exactly why that would be?

Originally Posted by Extenda View Post
it’s nuts that some Americans are neutral or tacitly pro-Russia in this whole shebang.
Last time I checked the US Constitution doesn't authorize the US federal government to protect foreign nations. At least not without a declaration of war. Ukraine, and Europe, are not a polity of the United States federal government.
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 10-01-2023, 07:04 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,160
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
No, there's no "aggressive expansion. It's just other nations joining of their own free will and volition. I wonder why.
... in violation of the Yalta Agreement.
Andy is offline  
Old 10-01-2023, 10:54 PM
  #29  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by Andy View Post
... in violation of the Yalta Agreement.
Yalta? That was 80 years ago. And the party which you're referring to has not existed for over 30 years. And we did actually allow the soviets to keep the agreed-to territory... while they actually existed.

Post USSR, there was some *discussion* about limiting the scope of NATO, but certainly no agreements or treaties.

As the Russian sphere dwindles, they tend to want to coerce their former subject states into remaining subjugated. Not surprisingly, that drives them into the western sphere. And Finland and Sweden would have been perfectly happy staying neutral... if vlad hadn't rolled the red army in the general direction of the Fulda Gap.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-02-2023, 04:09 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,595
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Yalta? That was 80 years ago. And the party which you're referring to has not existed for over 30 years.
So the Constitution shouldn't be followed since it's over 200 years old and everyone who signed it is dead?

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
As the Russian sphere dwindles, they tend to want to coerce their former subject states into remaining subjugated. Not surprisingly, that drives them into the western sphere. And Finland and Sweden would have been perfectly happy staying neutral... if vlad hadn't rolled the red army in the general direction of the Fulda Gap.
And if NATO hadn't expanded then Russia wouldn't have felt the need to invade Ukraine.
SonicFlyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jetlife
Part 135
3
04-14-2016 04:12 AM
gzsg
Delta
1
01-27-2016 12:07 PM
ATCsaidDoWhat
Union Talk
0
04-24-2015 05:35 AM
miker1369
Major
0
04-21-2006 03:38 PM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
3
01-20-2006 02:09 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices