Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
The market adapts.,, >

The market adapts.,,

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

The market adapts.,,

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Yesterday | 08:00 AM
  #1  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 264
Default The market adapts.,,

Post-War Oil Trade Could Look Nothing Like It Did Before Hormuz

By Irina Slav - Jun 07, 2026, 4:00 PM CDT

​​​​​​The legacy of the crisis will result in the construction of infrastructure to bypass the Strait of Hormuz,” Hamad Hussain, commodities economist at Capital Economics, told the Wall Street Journal. “The genie is out of the bottle given that the longstanding threat of Iran effectively closing the strait has now materialized.”

Many observers seem to believe that even when the war ends, one way or another, the oil landscape will change for good, with exporters investing in what the Wall Street Journal described as “an export network with multiple exits”—a real-life demonstration of the principle of distributing eggs to multiple baskets. As summed up by ADNOC’s head and the UAE’s energy minister, Sultan al-Jaber, “Energy security is no longer just about your ability to continue to produce. “It is about routes, access, storage and redundancy.”

Meanwhile, as warnings about a severe oil supply crunch multiply and get louder, some see relief on the horizon. Kpler, specifically, recently described a scenario in which Venezuelan, Iranian, and Russian oil all return to the market in greater volumes—which is already happening.
https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oi...re-Hormuz.html
Reply
Old Yesterday | 08:07 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,553
Likes: 154
Default

Daniel Yergin speaking with Geoff Bennett..

“Geoff Bennett: Lessons learned. I mean, has the fact that America is now this major energy producer, as you point out, has that fundamentally changed the country's vulnerability to global conflicts?

Daniel Yergin: I think it's not changed it, because, at the end of the day, it's one global oil market, but it's given us insulation and it's made the United States such a dominant player that we were not before. So that's such a dramatic change from previous crises.

Geoff Bennett: As we've covered on this program, a swift reopening of the strait does not necessarily mean a swift return to normal.

At day 100, how much longer do you estimate recovery would take if the strait reopened tomorrow?

Daniel Yergin: Well, I think you use the right word. It's not going to be a swift recovery. We estimate at S&P that it would take as much as six months to get back to 80 percent of where we were before. You got to get tankers out of the gulf. You got to get new tankers in.



“Geoff Bennett: What are you watching for as this progresses?

Daniel Yergin: I'm watching what happens with inventories is I think the number one thing. And, obviously, what is the state of the negotiation? Is there a deal or not a deal? And it keeps coming into focus and then going out again.

And Iran is really determined, I think, not to give up control of the strait. They want to turn what was an open, free navigation international waterway into an Iranian canal. And that's not acceptable to the Arab producers and it's certainly not acceptable for the world economy.
Reply
Old Yesterday | 11:29 AM
  #3  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 264
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido
Daniel Yergin speaking with Geoff Bennett..
“Geoff Bennett: Lessons learned. I mean, has the fact that America is now this major energy producer, as you point out, has that fundamentally changed the country's vulnerability to global conflicts?

Daniel Yergin: I think it's not changed it, because, at the end of the day, it's one global oil market, but it's given us insulation and it's made the United States such a dominant player that we were not before. So that's such a dramatic change from previous crises.
Disagree.

Were the US to DESIRE to do so, Congress coukd pass an excess profits tax on US oil companies exporting that would disincentivize petrochemical exports. They could LARGELY divorce the US petrochemical industry from the REST of the world economy. The companies would make less money and the international price of oil woukd increase, but manipulations to maximize profits (or retain more money locally) is what OPEC has been doing for decades.
Reply
Old Yesterday | 12:30 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,553
Likes: 154
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Disagree.

Were the US to DESIRE to do so, Congress coukd pass an excess profits tax on US oil companies exporting that would disincentivize petrochemical exports. They could LARGELY divorce the US petrochemical industry from the REST of the world economy. The companies would make less money and the international price of oil woukd increase, but manipulations to maximize profits (or retain more money locally) is what OPEC has been doing for decades.
Doubtful in this Congress.To say nothing of the loopholes already existing in offshore accounts.

Tax Avoidance Strategies of US Corporations

Since early 2025, American corporations have managed to evade over $40 billion in taxes following the Trump administration's exit from a global initiative aimed at reducing offshore tax evasion, as reported by a leading news outlet. The investigation reveals that numerous multinational firms have redirected profits to low-tax regions like Malta, Bermuda, Cyprus, the Cayman Islands, and Switzerland, frequently utilizing subsidiaries that operate with minimal or no workforce, offices, or actual business activities. his trend emerged after President Trump opted out of the OECD-supported global minimum tax framework, known as Pillar 2, on his first day back in office. This agreement aimed to establish a 15% minimum corporate tax rate globally to deter profit shifting to tax havens.

Companies from nearly every significant industry have employed offshore strategies to drastically lower their tax obligations. Notable firms mentioned include American Express, PayPal, Walmart, Uber, PepsiCo, Honeywell, and Abbott Laboratories.

Malta has been identified as a key location for tax savings, with allegations that Abbott Laboratories funneled global profits through a Maltese subsidiary that has no employees, significantly slashing its tax liabilities by hundreds of millions.

This analysis is based on recent disclosures in corporate SEC filings, which mandate public companies to disclose tax savings associated with foreign operations. Critics contend that the withdrawal from the global tax agreement has undermined efforts to combat aggressive offshore tax strategies, allowing companies to broaden such practices.
Reply
Old Yesterday | 09:30 PM
  #5  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 264
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido
Doubtful in this Congress.To say nothing of the loopholes already existing in offshore accounts.
Not even suggesting it, just saying it COULD. The point is, every economic challenge has workarounds. They may take some time to implement but just as nature hates a vacuum, the
market will eventually flow around an obstruction.
Reply
Old Today | 06:27 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,553
Likes: 154
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Not even suggesting it, just saying it COULD. The point is, every economic challenge has workarounds. They may take some time to implement but just as nature hates a vacuum, the
market will eventually flow around an obstruction.
True, market demand clears its own pathways. As obstructions go otoh, this one’s a doozy. Yergin mentioned pending inventory shortfalls. He’s clearly not alone in that opinion. Industry pundits and most oil bosses have sounded the alarm on likelihood of delivery interruptions approaching this summer into fall. Particularly in Asia. A third of global fertilizer export is gone. Tehran is all out of friends. Even so, any doubts who’ll carry the blame for all this?
Reply
Old Today | 06:58 AM
  #7  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,226
Likes: 824
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Disagree.

Were the US to DESIRE to do so, Congress coukd pass an excess profits tax on US oil companies exporting that would disincentivize petrochemical exports. They could LARGELY divorce the US petrochemical industry from the REST of the world economy. The companies would make less money and the international price of oil woukd increase, but manipulations to maximize profits (or retain more money locally) is what OPEC has been doing for decades.
Not very likely. Our economy is dependent on global oil and global oil economy.

But it is nice to know that in the event of a serious national security situation we can at least fuel a war economy and military operations indefinitely. Unlike say Japan in 1941.
Reply
Old Today | 08:48 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,553
Likes: 154
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Not very likely. Our economy is dependent on global oil and global oil economy.

But it is nice to know that in the event of a serious national security situation we can at least fuel a war economy and military operations indefinitely. Unlike say Japan in 1941.
It certainly is.

Let’s say oil trades globally a modest 15% higher than prewar averages for the next 18 months. Higher energy expense gets passed into just about every staple consumer item. Including cost of borrowing. Growth slows, stagnation and lowered quality of life fuel political unrest. Dogs and cats scrap over the next regime of lying losers to vote for. Southwest acquires AA
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JLAMS16
Alaska
1730
09-18-2024 07:07 AM
DLax85
Cargo
6
11-04-2009 06:01 AM
Koolaidman
Regional
187
11-28-2007 07:40 PM
Sir James
Money Talk
17
06-11-2006 08:38 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
06-06-2005 09:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices