Grumman Goose?
02-02-2008, 07:09 PM
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Lovin' life at .4 (ish) mach
Posts: 1,317
Grumman Goose?
Heard the ol' Goose is going to be going back into production, except not by Grumman (of course) but by some one I can't remember. Who has info? It's great that this is going to happen, the Goose is an awesome airplane.-JSF
02-02-2008, 07:49 PM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Lovin' life at .4 (ish) mach
Posts: 1,317
BTW, found the link for the article. Too bad it's a turbo prop, not the ol' radials.
http://antillesseaplanes.com/biznc.htm
http://antillesseaplanes.com/biznc.htm
02-03-2008, 03:43 AM
#6
Works Every Weekend
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
Be like having the option between a Harley and a ninja.
Because motorcycles shouldn't have the uselful RPM range of a Lycoming.I agree with you about the airplane though, round engines or nothing.
02-03-2008, 07:11 AM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 919
Huge difference in useful load between the Turbines and Radials. From the website:
Empty weight on both (shouldn't it be lower with the Turbines?): 7,200lbs
Radial MGTOW: 9,200lbs
Turbine MGTOW: 12,500lbs
I love the radials - that would be a personal pick for me.
Empty weight on both (shouldn't it be lower with the Turbines?): 7,200lbs
Radial MGTOW: 9,200lbs
Turbine MGTOW: 12,500lbs
I love the radials - that would be a personal pick for me.
02-03-2008, 08:06 AM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Lovin' life at .4 (ish) mach
Posts: 1,317
When I first found it, I just glanced over it. I was saying the rumor that I heard about it being fitted with Turboprops. Then I went back through and saw that the radials are an option, which I'm happy about, but am not sure about the "Standard aluminum/carbon fiber construction".... It'll be neat though...
02-03-2008, 09:20 AM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: Still Swinging props!
Posts: 297
They just banged one up? That's the story up here....
There are a few still flying the radial version Goose up here in AK. After playing around the Albatros birds that flock to Boulder City every year, the Goose is cute! Lotta work, though. And thirsty, too.
We have a Goose restoration project wrapping up here in KTN. It's very cool.
Where can I be found? Where the SOUND is ROUND!!!!
Cheers,
Ronin
There are a few still flying the radial version Goose up here in AK. After playing around the Albatros birds that flock to Boulder City every year, the Goose is cute! Lotta work, though. And thirsty, too.
We have a Goose restoration project wrapping up here in KTN. It's very cool.
Where can I be found? Where the SOUND is ROUND!!!!
Cheers,
Ronin
Last edited by Frozen Ronin; 02-03-2008 at 09:21 AM. Reason: grammar
02-03-2008, 09:20 AM
#10
Che Guevara
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Originally Posted by stinsonjr
Huge difference in useful load between the Turbines and Radials. From the website:
Empty weight on both (shouldn't it be lower with the Turbines?): 7,200lbs
Radial MGTOW: 9,200lbs
Turbine MGTOW: 12,500lbs
I love the radials - that would be a personal pick for me.
Empty weight on both (shouldn't it be lower with the Turbines?): 7,200lbs
Radial MGTOW: 9,200lbs
Turbine MGTOW: 12,500lbs
I love the radials - that would be a personal pick for me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
