Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
thoughts about VLJ's >

thoughts about VLJ's


Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

thoughts about VLJ's

Old 03-11-2008 | 08:49 AM
  #1  
PearlPilot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
From: DHC-8 SIC
Default thoughts about VLJ's

So I've been doing some research on these newly emerging VLJ's like the Phenom 100, 300, CJ1, and Eclipse 500. Dayjet is planning to operate more than 1000 VLJ's within 5 years and Avant Air and Flight Options has orders for Phenom 100 and 300s respectively. So my question is, would you as a pilot be "happy" flying one of these babies till you hit 65? This idea is contrary to the popular belief that a pilot would be most satisfied if he/she would retire flying a wide body. Money is not that of an issue since you can easily git 6 figures by the time you retire and the QOL is much better than most majors and legacies (so I hear). I would like to hear some thoughts about this.
Reply
Old 03-11-2008 | 08:57 AM
  #2  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,120
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

QOL advantages are there for VLJ pilots...home every day, probably never leave their own time zone. There are some downsides...

- No travel bennies

- 5 days on, 2 off in VLJ's. I get 4 on, 4-6 off at a regional.

- Economics...I doubt that 1-3 paying pax will ever be able to support a payscale better than a regional, and probably not even that. I understand they are paying OK now, but that's startup operations where they expect to lose money. Will they ever be able to earn enough to pay 2 real pilots? I have always thought that the biggest hole in the VLJ concept was the fact that, however tiny, they are turbojets, and will need real pilots to get insured (and the owner-operatots will need babysitters). Six figures by the time you retire is nothing...many college grads are starting at $70K, and getting six figures by age 30.

I'm sure it will work well for some pilots, but if they put thousands and thousands in service, they will have trouble finding people to fly them I think.
Reply
Old 03-11-2008 | 09:27 AM
  #3  
Ewfflyer's Avatar
Flying Farmer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,160
Likes: 0
From: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Default

I really don't know how Dayjet is paying 2 pilots to fly those things, not to mention Eclipse still isn't FIKI or RVSM(last I checked, updates anyone?)

Where you'll actually make money flying a VLJ is part 91, single pilot. Two pilots in these things just take away too much from it's useful load in my opinion.
Reply
Old 03-11-2008 | 09:46 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: El Capitan
Default

The only proven design so far is the Mustang. Pretty slick little plane.
Reply
Old 03-11-2008 | 10:07 AM
  #5  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,120
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Ewfflyer
Where you'll actually make money flying a VLJ is part 91, single pilot. Two pilots in these things just take away too much from it's useful load in my opinion.
Good luck with insurance on that...not going to happen for a commercial operator (which would have to be 135 anyway). The VLJ commercial operators have always said they will use two pilots.

The only folks who will get insured to fly VLJ's single-pilot are going to be owner operators...who happen to be FDX CA's. Most owner-operators will require a baby-sitter.
Reply
Old 03-12-2008 | 06:29 AM
  #6  
Ewfflyer's Avatar
Flying Farmer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,160
Likes: 0
From: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Good luck with insurance on that...not going to happen for a commercial operator (which would have to be 135 anyway). The VLJ commercial operators have always said they will use two pilots.

The only folks who will get insured to fly VLJ's single-pilot are going to be owner operators...who happen to be FDX CA's. Most owner-operators will require a baby-sitter.
The operator I was working for, who had #4 of the E-500 on order, was going to be approved insurance-wise for single-pilot ops. So I guess it's just how you work it, but still seems to be overkill. Insurance companies are our own worst enemies.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
flyingfalcon401
Regional
64
07-19-2007 03:39 PM
pilot754
Regional
93
07-07-2007 12:15 PM
freezingflyboy
Piedmont Airlines
20
12-22-2005 09:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices