Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
2 Planes Land While ATC Naps @ DCA >

2 Planes Land While ATC Naps @ DCA

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

2 Planes Land While ATC Naps @ DCA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2011 | 12:47 PM
  #81  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

Here comes the FAA knee jerk!

"Regional radar facilities are now required to alert controllers working alone at night in an airport tower that a plane is approaching, FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt said in a statement. The radar controllers are "to confirm that there is a controller prepared to handle the incoming flight," he said.

Regional controllers have also been reminded that if no controller can be raised at an airport tower, proper procedures require they offer pilots the option of diverting to another airport, Babbitt said.

Controllers at a regional FAA radar facility in Warrenton, Va., about 40 miles from Reagan, didn't offer that option to the pilots who were to unable reach the airport's tower between 12:04 and 12:28 am on Wednesday."
Reply
Old 03-26-2011 | 12:50 PM
  #82  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

Originally Posted by EasternATC
Thank you for saying this. I've known the gent involved for over 15 years, and I feel sure this is exactly what happened.

It's possible for anybody to fall asleep, true. And if this guy was a bargaining unit member Air Traffic Controller, he/she would be facing disciplinary action.

Because this is so high profile, I'm guessing this supervisorg will get some, too.

Good guy, or not.
Reply
Old 03-26-2011 | 12:53 PM
  #83  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
While hanging out in the tower of a class D airport, the topic came up and a controller said they keep a headset extended in the tower that reaches all the way to the bathroom below.

They actually have a transceiver in the bathroom in Guam, I think.

I've taken the handheld transceiver to the bathroom when in the tower by myself and need a biological visit, BUT, I called the overlying and asked if anything was inbound. Then, told them that I'd be back in a few minutes.
Reply
Old 03-26-2011 | 07:51 PM
  #84  
tortue's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
Here comes the FAA knee jerk!

"Regional radar facilities are now required to alert controllers working alone at night in an airport tower that a plane is approaching, FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt said in a statement. The radar controllers are "to confirm that there is a controller prepared to handle the incoming flight," he said.
So now a TRACON or Center has to maintain periodic "health checks" of all of its underlying controlled airports to make sure they're not asleep? How often must they do that?

Why not just install headsets with shockers at the Center/TRACON so they can buzz them if they don't get a response.
Reply
Old 03-27-2011 | 04:13 AM
  #85  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

Originally Posted by tortue
So now a TRACON or Center has to maintain periodic "health checks" of all of its underlying controlled airports to make sure they're not asleep? How often must they do that?

Not periodic.... EVERY time a plane is inbound.
Reply
Old 03-27-2011 | 05:17 PM
  #86  
Shiek Yiboudi's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Default

It sounds to me like the airplane that went around showed excellent CRM. They communicated with the approach controller to verify no one was answering in the tower. All safety or work equipment should be monitoring the tower freq anyway, except for the made up terrorist truck. (fat chance at Reagan National)
The point everyone is missing here is that this NEVER would have happened if the controller had brought his kid to work that night!
Reply
Old 03-27-2011 | 06:18 PM
  #87  
Rolf's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 664
Likes: 1
Default

WSJ has an article about this. http://http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703576204576227111819017454.html?r u=yahoo&mod=yahoo_hs If only our airlines would hire attorneys instead of pilots to fly, this obviously would be a thing of the past (as no airplane would ever fly). I just love it when the penguins start to monday quarterback.
Reply
Old 03-27-2011 | 07:01 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Fero's
Default

From the lawyer,

"it is absolutely not up to the pilots to decide to land as though it was an uncontrolled airport."

From the regs,

(a) The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft.

And then there is this,

Both planes, carrying a total of more than 160 people, landed safely.

I don't get it...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jelloy683
Regional
13
08-14-2007 02:54 PM
jelloy683
Major
4
08-13-2007 05:24 PM
SkyHigh
Major
109
04-12-2006 09:00 AM
Was That For Us?
Major
0
10-20-2005 09:55 PM
Sir James
Major
1
10-09-2005 06:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices