Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Boeing vs Airbus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-2006, 11:53 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 408
Default

Approach plates can be clipped to the yoke, and as far as meals go, I'd hardly call the added convenience of being able to set a tray down for the tiny fraction of the flight a pilot actually spends eating a "great advancement." The sidestick further removes the pilot from the loop, since it doesn't provide any tactical feedback. If anything, it's a degradation in human factors.

Last edited by Uncle Bose; 11-06-2006 at 12:00 PM.
Uncle Bose is offline  
Old 11-06-2006, 12:13 PM
  #12  
Piper Commander
 
Illini's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: PA44 - Right
Posts: 302
Default

Originally Posted by Uncle Bose View Post
Approach plates can be clipped to the yoke, and as far as meals go, I'd hardly call the added convenience of being able to set a tray down for the tiny fraction of the flight a pilot actually spends eating a "great advancement." The sidestick further removes the pilot from the loop, since it doesn't provide any tactical feedback. If anything, it's a degradation in human factors.
The pilots never have clipped plates on their yoke, but instead put it on the side tray under the window on all the boeing flights I've been on. Maybe it is preference but maybe its not but its definitely convenient. Furthermore, with long haul operations, one could place a laptop on the tray if accessing material such as MEL or Ops Specs. Just an observation.
Illini is offline  
Old 11-06-2006, 01:22 PM
  #13  
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
FlyerJosh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Executive Transport Driver
Posts: 3,080
Default

Originally Posted by Uncle Bose View Post
Approach plates can be clipped to the yoke, and as far as meals go, I'd hardly call the added convenience of being able to set a tray down for the tiny fraction of the flight a pilot actually spends eating a "great advancement." The sidestick further removes the pilot from the loop, since it doesn't provide any tactical feedback. If anything, it's a degradation in human factors.

Most hydraulic aircraft don't provide much in the way of tactile feedback... it's the same whether your flying along at 120 knots, still on the ground, or at FL390 and .85 mach. Same goes for many of the advanced fly by wire aircraft/fighters that are out there in the wild blue yonder.

Unless you are flying a smaller aircraft (such as the Citation) which has no hydraulic boost, the difference between a yoke and sidestick is more preference than feel/performance.

I do consider having a place to conveniently set up the laptop/DVD player a "great advancement" for pilot convenience these days...
FlyerJosh is offline  
Old 11-06-2006, 02:22 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CRJ-200's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 249
Default

I've never flown a 'bus or a Boeing, but I have flown a Cessna Skyhawk and a Katana - it's the same stick vs. yoke situation. I really don't prefer one over the other, although I do feel like I have a better grip on things when I can use both hands to fly.
CRJ-200 is offline  
Old 11-06-2006, 02:52 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HotMamaPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FO - 757/767
Posts: 1,228
Default

Originally Posted by mike734 View Post
I have no knowledge about the specific structures involved but I doubt the tail of a 777 or 767 would break off as easily as it did on the American A-300 in New York in 2001.
ya, enough said! Boeing all the way!
HotMamaPilot is offline  
Old 11-06-2006, 05:00 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
aero550's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Citation II
Posts: 315
Default

I have a question about FBW/sidestick aircraft (for someone that has actually flown one, please): When the autopilot is engaged, can you feel or see the stick move while the AP is flying (like in a conventional control setup), or is the stick stationary as if it were a computer game joystick?

If the stick stays "dead" during AP operations, this would bug me. In a conventional control aircraft, you can leave a hand on the yoke and feel what the AP is doing and still have some connection to the status of the aircraft, like in turbulence or on a coupled approach.
aero550 is offline  
Old 11-06-2006, 10:26 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 408
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerJosh View Post
Most hydraulic aircraft don't provide much in the way of tactile feedback... it's the same whether your flying along at 120 knots, still on the ground, or at FL390 and .85 mach. Same goes for many of the advanced fly by wire aircraft/fighters that are out there in the wild blue yonder.

Unless you are flying a smaller aircraft (such as the Citation) which has no hydraulic boost, the difference between a yoke and sidestick is more preference than feel/performance.

I do consider having a place to conveniently set up the laptop/DVD player a "great advancement" for pilot convenience these days...
True...the artificial feel in a hydraulic system still isn't like a mechanical, and for a 5-hour session in the Boredom Tube, I can definitely see the advantage of having a place to set your DVD player.
Uncle Bose is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 10:12 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,575
Default

Originally Posted by Illini View Post
The pilots never have clipped plates on their yoke, but instead put it on the side tray under the window on all the boeing flights I've been on. Maybe it is preference but maybe its not but its definitely convenient. Furthermore, with long haul operations, one could place a laptop on the tray if accessing material such as MEL or Ops Specs. Just an observation.
I put my flight number on a piece of paper on the yoke and make notes on it as needed. "Souls on board", HF freq.s, etc. I put my Jepps in a 1" trip book clipped to the side holder. Works fine.

I've never flown an airbus, so I won't say anything about it. Some people comment that it was made for inexperienced pilots to fly easily.?

Boeing has some old cockpits- even the NG 737 keep the 1960's cockpit. I don't like that. I do like flying the 737. The 757/767 is a transitional cockpit. Half glass, half analog from the 1980's. Still they are great aircraft and I love to fly them. The 767-400 has the modern cockpit and is real nice. The 777 has got the new cockpit too. The 787 will be even a little better. Airbus wasn't even around in the "old cockpit instrument" days, so it's not fair to compare. Both "modern" Boeings and Airbus's have modern cockpits and instruments. While new instruments are cool and nice, the old or new instruments tell you the same thing and a plane is a plane. I like the last one I flew. I like the one I fly now. I'll like the one I fly next too.

I'd like to fly an Airbus someday to compare, but I'd better hurry- the A350 & A380 might kill Airbus for good.
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 10:16 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,575
Default

Originally Posted by Uncle Bose View Post
True...the artificial feel in a hydraulic system still isn't like a mechanical, and for a 5-hour session in the Boredom Tube, I can definitely see the advantage of having a place to set your DVD player.
A laptop or DVD player fits fine in front of the throttle quadrant and plugs in behind the FO if you need to. Not that I've ever done that. I just heard that from others.

My meals are served on trays that fit on my lap just fine. It is hard to see the instruments/map when you have the seat back and reclined- the yoke is in the way. I have to sit up to see it or just look at the CA's side.
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 10:23 AM
  #20  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

On another forum a guy named Dale Gribble has flown the A350 and several Boeings. He said from his personal experience if he never touches an Airbus he'll be just fine with that.

If it aint Boeing I aint going!
ToiletDuck is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flea Bite
Cargo
34
07-12-2006 04:21 PM
fireman0174
Major
4
05-24-2006 08:44 AM
Linebacker35
Major
122
03-26-2006 10:14 AM
captain_drew
Hangar Talk
0
12-30-2005 07:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices