Another step forward for the U.S. military.
#31
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Beverly Hills,swimming pools,movie stars
Posts: 48
All this is gonna do is get some swinging d!(k killed when he goes back to try to save some pc,liberal,idiot chick cause they broke a nail, or saw a snake.
I think I need to puke.
#32
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Beverly Hills,swimming pools,movie stars
Posts: 48
Perfect example for ya.
#33
Kara Hultgreen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
#34
I've been thinking the same thing lately but haven't heard of any change in the works; but then I just found out that Te'os GF wasn't real either!
Google-fu research:
Selective Service System: Fast Facts
DoD noted that America's prior drafts were used to supply adequate numbers of Army ground combat troops. Because women are excluded by policy from front line combat positions, excluding them from the draft process remains justifiable in DoD's view. Although no conclusions were reached, DoD recognized that policies regarding women need to be reviewed periodically because the role of women in the military continues to expand.
#35
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Beverly Hills,swimming pools,movie stars
Posts: 48
And here is an example of the Navy lowering the standards to force the PC issue...
Kara Hultgreen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Kara Hultgreen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Whelp, there ya go.
I got nothin else!!
#36
Seems simple enough. Females must register.
I've been thinking the same thing lately but haven't heard of any change in the works; but then I just found out that Te'os GF wasn't real either!
Google-fu research:
Selective Service System: Fast Facts
Guess that will change then
I've been thinking the same thing lately but haven't heard of any change in the works; but then I just found out that Te'os GF wasn't real either!
Google-fu research:
Selective Service System: Fast Facts
Guess that will change then
#37
Wow. People are so fearful of moving forward. Sure, a few people/entities in the past have lowered standards. Is that the way it is overall today with airlines and industry? You guys have got to get past your fear of other people having a "piece of the pie".
#38
Reasonable accommodation would be being supplied tampons, or having a women's shower in addition to a men's, etc...Get past your fear.
#39
I also think you have a reading comprehension problem. I NEVER say or intimate most of the things you accuse me of. I said if anyone wants to sign up for the front lines, God bless 'em. Not me....I'm not cut out for it. Then again, I'm sure there are plenty of males who aren't either. AND you're totally off the mark with your stupid "liberal chicks" comment as they don't believe in war and would never sign up for anything, much less the front lines.
So, go ahead and continue your silly little game and try to bait me. I'm not taking it anymore. You and your pals have your fun. I will only respond to level-headed, intelligent and mature comments. Sadly, there's not much of that here lately.
Tata darling.
#40
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: electron wrangler
Posts: 372
Re: Another step forward for the U. S.
The issue here is an equal playing field for military promotion. One needs a command and a warfare specialty (better still-the command of a warfare unit in theater) to get
to the flag ranks.
This isn't new. US military women have been getting killed and maimed in hot zones
for years. Regulations are just now catching up with reality.
.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post