Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Hiring News
Jobs in China for ERJ,CRJ and Dornier drivers >

Jobs in China for ERJ,CRJ and Dornier drivers

Search

Notices
Hiring News Latest news and rumors

Jobs in China for ERJ,CRJ and Dornier drivers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-30-2008 | 12:12 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 142
Likes: 3
From: pic
Default Jobs in China for ERJ,CRJ and Dornier drivers

Hey here is something for RJ drivers in China both CAP and FO, apparently they're hiring for the ERJ145,190, CRJ-200 and Dornier 328
LINK: World Aviation Systems Inc

Reply
Old 08-30-2008 | 01:57 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: MD80
Default

Mesa will be hiring shortly once they find out how they're going to pay their bills, they'll be able to match those 8 days off as well.
Reply
Old 08-30-2008 | 11:13 PM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

mesa is looking for a buyer for it's share of their "unprofitable" china operation. Seems jo really is the corrupt business idiot we all know and hate.
Reply
Old 09-01-2008 | 10:51 AM
  #4  
JetMonkey's Avatar
Cactus Aviator
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Learning to fly with my left hand.
Default

That last requirement is interesting. "No license limitations". I got a EMB-145 type but it has that stupid circling approach-VMC only limitation on it, everyone got that on their type when I was at ExpressJet. They would probably want me to get it removed and I'm not sure how I'd do that without paying for another type ride??
Reply
Old 09-02-2008 | 08:30 AM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Default

China CACC will not accept a US license with a circle to land restriction on it. You'll have to go to the sim, spend 15 mins and do a circle to land approach, and have the FAA reissue the license. China will not accept a temp license either. Got to have plastic in hand.
Reply
Old 09-02-2008 | 08:48 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by JetMonkey
That last requirement is interesting. "No license limitations". I got a EMB-145 type but it has that stupid circling approach-VMC only limitation on it, everyone got that on their type when I was at ExpressJet. They would probably want me to get it removed and I'm not sure how I'd do that without paying for another type ride??

Isn't that an SIC type? I've never seen a PIC Type with a circling restriction on it?
Reply
Old 09-02-2008 | 10:13 AM
  #7  
Are we there yet??!!
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
Isn't that an SIC type? I've never seen a PIC Type with a circling restriction on it?
Nope, its common in the US to have the cirlcing restriction. Most, if not all 121 carriers do not train to do circle to land.
Reply
Old 09-02-2008 | 11:00 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by Thedude
Nope, its common in the US to have the cirlcing restriction. Most, if not all 121 carriers do not train to do circle to land.

On jet equipment. Turbo props are another story. MESA -8 crews are trained/approved to circle. I wouldn't doubt that other turbo prop operators are as well.

Originally Posted by wxyz
China CACC will not accept a US license with a circle to land restriction on it. You'll have to go to the sim, spend 15 mins and do a circle to land approach, and have the FAA reissue the license. China will not accept a temp license either. Got to have plastic in hand.
I have yet to hear a definintve answer on this. If your type was done under an airlines approved training program, you might be able to to get an APD do it on a PC, might.

However, if you are thinking about going to an outside vendor such as FSI, CAE, or ANY other facility, it may be a whole different story all togehter and would entail more than just 15 minutes in the sim. Reason I heard (heard only). Going to an outside facility, they will more than likely train to the manufactorer's SOP procedures, which are not the ones you got your type under. Your type was granted under that specific airlines approved program. Hence, they may be required to train/check MORE than just the circle maneuver to get it removed.

If anybody else knows this be to correct or incorrect, please let us know.

Last edited by dojetdriver; 09-02-2008 at 11:07 AM.
Reply
Old 09-02-2008 | 01:26 PM
  #9  
CloudSailor's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 0
Default

Many FO's at F9 are getting their circling restriction removed by some of the very generous DE's, when the time comes for their PC/PT. It takes a one hour brief, one practice circle-to-land, and one "real" circle-to-land.
Piece of cake once it's all said and done. Get in touch with someone you know in your training department and see if they can approve it. It's worked great here so far... for many FO's.
Good luck.
Reply
Old 09-02-2008 | 04:39 PM
  #10  
JetMonkey's Avatar
Cactus Aviator
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Learning to fly with my left hand.
Default

Originally Posted by wxyz
China CACC will not accept a US license with a circle to land restriction on it. You'll have to go to the sim, spend 15 mins and do a circle to land approach, and have the FAA reissue the license. China will not accept a temp license either. Got to have plastic in hand.
Well, the problem with going back into the sim and getting it removed is the fact that I haven't flown the 145 in over four years. I'd probably have to buy some sim time first just to get the feel of it again. Then there's the issue of China wanting you to have currency in the actual plane during the last 12 months as well. You can't win for losing!
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices