Is US Airways hiring or not?
#33
On Reserve
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
I remember in 1999 when US Airways hired guys off the street, my buddy went directly into the B767 International program. What are the prospects that that might happen again to 190 FO new hires onto different aircraft types i.e. A330 etc.
It would be cost effective for the company ( $3000 month first year pay) and be a training float solution.
It would be cost effective for the company ( $3000 month first year pay) and be a training float solution.
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: A319/20/21 FO
At the numbers they are talking about hiring over the next couple of years, I would think new-hires to the A320 would be a possibility. I doubt the 737 since the airframe is headed for the boneyard over the next couple of years. As for the widebodies, I suspect there are plenty on property already who want those slots. But I suppose anything is possible.
One never knows about the future of the 190 fleet. A friend on the inside there got directly from Scott Kirby that a fleet of 15 airplanes wasn't sustainable in the long term ... he said the fleet would either get bigger or go away over time. Anyone's guess how that plays out vis-a-vis capacity issues, minimum fleet count, and the usual industry turmoil.
One never knows about the future of the 190 fleet. A friend on the inside there got directly from Scott Kirby that a fleet of 15 airplanes wasn't sustainable in the long term ... he said the fleet would either get bigger or go away over time. Anyone's guess how that plays out vis-a-vis capacity issues, minimum fleet count, and the usual industry turmoil.
#35
Yeah, new-hires directly into the A320 will be a possibility. Becoming very likely into 2013 when the retirements really start to leave the property. Between now and then, E190 looks to be the only option unless the new flight time/duty regs require a recalculation of pilot manning levels.
No prospects at all for the next several years. All the guys coming up on retirement who desire a B767/A330 seat, must bid it prior to age 63, or the company will not train them. The majority of the pilot group is already at top-of-scale (12th year) pay rates, so both CAs and FOs desire the widebody positions in order to maximize their pay from an agreement that was made during bankruptcy. The most junior 767 FO is a 12 year employee (possibly from the same 1999 new-hire class as your buddy), at top-of-scale pay, and makes only $1 less per hour than the most junior E190 CA that has the same 12 years of service.
No prospects at all for the next several years. All the guys coming up on retirement who desire a B767/A330 seat, must bid it prior to age 63, or the company will not train them. The majority of the pilot group is already at top-of-scale (12th year) pay rates, so both CAs and FOs desire the widebody positions in order to maximize their pay from an agreement that was made during bankruptcy. The most junior 767 FO is a 12 year employee (possibly from the same 1999 new-hire class as your buddy), at top-of-scale pay, and makes only $1 less per hour than the most junior E190 CA that has the same 12 years of service.
Last edited by trent890; 05-06-2011 at 06:40 PM.
#38
New pilot bid is out. Latest new-hire class of 12 PHL E190 FOs from January 2011, was still seatlocked into the E190 for the July bid. Even though there are A320 openings in PHL, DCA and CLT that their seniority could hold, they haven't been released from the seatlock to aircraft type.
New-hires directly into the A320 will be a possibility. Becoming very likely into 2013 when the retirements really start to leave the property. Between now and then, E190 looks to be the only option unless the new flight time/duty regs require a recalculation of pilot manning levels.
2 CLT A320 FO
14 DCA A320 FO
3 PHL A320 FO
14 PHL E190 FO
#40
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Pilot
Regional
20
01-01-2022 05:02 PM
Was That For Us?
Major
22
06-03-2007 07:53 AM



