Horizon Teamsters Email
It's been 13 minutes and not a peep out of anyone on here. Figured I'd get the ball rolling. Somebody want to fill me in on what all those numbers mean?
|
Haha!
Hahaha! They state that a 14% reduction in pilot cost is necessary to be competitive in order to place a bid for a fleet plan that would be a total of 62 potential airplanes in a 5 year time frame. We have 52 airplanes currently. With currrent orders, we'll have 54 airplanes by the end of 2017. So a 14% reduction in cost in order to have absolutely no guarantee of a net increase of 8 airframes? Man! What a sweet deal! We should jump on this thing immediately! |
They want you to take concessions for "potential" aircraft, so they can be competitive? So Horizon isnt competitive with 52 airplanes, and they want 62? As a former Teamster member: they should stick to truckers.
|
Apparently company-wide, we need to cut costs by 28% in order to match SkyWest.
Alaska has stated that their plan for the Q400 fleet is a reduction of 20 airframes. I hadn't read that bit until after my previous post. |
Let's see how many FOs vote with their feet.
|
Originally Posted by lowflying
(Post 1961000)
Let's see how many FOs vote with their feet.
|
Essentially, on a 350 nm route, our analysis finds that the Q400 has about a 65-72% advantage in terms of fuel burn per seat versus the E170/CRJ-700, and a 100-110% advantage versus a 50-seat regional jet. This, along with rising RJ maintenance costs, translates into roughly a 15-17% and 48-52% advantage in terms of operating cost per seat on the route.
So why do they need money from you guys?????? Really??? |
k
Originally Posted by pete2800
(Post 1960995)
Apparently company-wide, we need to cut costs by 28% in order to match SkyWest.
Alaska has stated that their plan for the Q400 fleet is a reduction of 20 airframes. I hadn't read that bit until after my previous post. So the increase of 10 airframes (52 to 62) will come at a cost of 20 Q's? So does that mean that you guys are getting 30 jets? I have seen a few of those SKW 200's in COS...is that where they will go? |
Just looking from the outside in, but I think your union leadership is out of touch with reality. Concessions in this environment is not crazy, it's ludicrous! May I suggest actions similar to Delta Air Lines pilot group; it is named after the movie "Total Recall."
|
Originally Posted by billyho
(Post 1961007)
Essentially, on a 350 nm route, our analysis finds that the Q400 has about a 65-72% advantage in terms of fuel burn per seat versus the E170/CRJ-700, and a 100-110% advantage versus a 50-seat regional jet. This, along with rising RJ maintenance costs, translates into roughly a 15-17% and 48-52% advantage in terms of operating cost per seat on the route.
So why do they need money from you guys?????? Really???
Originally Posted by pilotwithnoname
(Post 1961008)
k
So the increase of 10 airframes (52 to 62) will come at a cost of 20 Q's? So does that mean that you guys are getting 30 jets? I have seen a few of those SKW 200's in COS...is that where they will go? So far, the deal right now looks quite similar to a random email from a Saudi Prince who needs you to help him import a metric ton of cash money. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:49 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands