The whole industry is behind you guys, don't take concessions, particularly on such a long contract term. Your pilot group is better then this. There is a shortage of pilots, or at least pilots willing to work for low wages, you have leverage. Vote No.
|
Originally Posted by lowflying
(Post 2043664)
This is indrusty standard at its worst and still has industry leading pay,vacation, sick retirement etc. How is the enabling a race to the bottom?
|
Originally Posted by Cruz5350
(Post 2043714)
It's an 8 year contract, it won't be industry standard (your words not mine) for very long.
I'm wondering how management thinks that even if ratified, this contract will attract new hires? I just don't see it... |
The odds we'll go the full 8 years without something substantial changing are pretty slim, and the fact that the TA protects 52 airplanes is something of a hedge against outsourcing more of our flying within that period.
That said, I completely agree with pete2800 about this offering nothing to new hires. Unless something drastically changes, anyone coming here will be looking at around a 2 year upgrade, but it's going to be into a Q400 (with a lousy schedule) unless they want to sit right seat for a decade on the jet listening to the old guys complain about how we didn't get jet rates and how much better things were in the F28 and CRJ days. While we do have really good vacation and benefits, I don't think those are enough to offset having to transition to a more difficult airplane and worse schedule to upgrade, even if we start offering the signing bonus that Air Group has apparently signed off on.
Originally Posted by amcnd
(Post 2043609)
So 30 jets with how may Q's going away?? I see this as a get rid of the Q's over the next 2-3 years as the 30 E175's come online.. And.., pop in a cheap saab 340 operator to fill in the gaps with the small citys...
|
Originally Posted by Cruz5350
(Post 2043714)
It's an 8 year contract, it won't be industry standard (your words not mine) for very long.
|
Originally Posted by lowflying
(Post 2043769)
Let's hope not. It's time some other groups raised the average instead of hanging on the coat tails of other groups.
|
Originally Posted by Cruz5350
(Post 2043820)
The past is not indicative of the future... Nothing says you won't live with this contract for 8 years so why not vote it down and get gains no matter how small in all areas. PBS is awful, I'd give anything to go back to Line bidding with SAP if I could. With that said the gains I'm hearing in this TA are not worth what you will lose in PBS.
|
Is a drumb something a trollolloll beats?
Originally Posted by FaceBiter
(Post 2043831)
Hold on..... you're trying to thump the union drumb when the company came to you mid contract to ask for concessions?...and the magical Union actually negotiated with them.... Now that's funny.
|
Originally Posted by FaceBiter
(Post 2043831)
Hold on..... you're trying to thump the union drumb when the company came to you mid contract to ask for concessions?...and the magical Union actually negotiated with them.... Now that's funny.
What!?!? I'm not thumping anything. I like Skywest I wish I'd gone there but they have always been number two or three in everything. Qx has had a great jet pay scale on the books for close two 3 years no one has come close to it. So you think we should shrink to make a statement? I'd rather another group stepped up.. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:08 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands