![]() |
Which of you bet?
It wasn't long ago some of you made a bet we would have an agreement before Spirit. Want to come forward?
|
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 2505268)
It wasn't long ago some of you made a bet we would have an agreement before Spirit. Want to come forward?
|
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 2505268)
It wasn't long ago some of you made a bet we would have an agreement before Spirit. Want to come forward?
Your incessant need for validation is fascinating, yet irritating. Starting a thread......for the likes of this? Here, I'll help. Yes. You're right. You've been right all along. The (very few) others you target here with your post(s) have, apparently, not been right. Does that help? Except, this isn't the first airline contract go-'round for most of us. You seem to think it is. Most of us don't choose to engage with you (and you can consider me TOTD for doing so). Yet, the vast majority actually agree with your belief of the whole circus (more validation for you). And it's the same ol' back and forth with the same ol' players. It's tiresome. And unproductive (Yeah. I know. Ignore function). And you or anyone else will not sway another's beliefs on a dopey internet forum. Let it go. You and the other players can eviscerate me all you want. Don't care. Won't reply. Because, except for those select minority juicers (who also won't sway any arguments) we really are desirous of the same thing. See you on 1/31. |
Originally Posted by Alterbridge
(Post 2505307)
Jesus Christ.
Your incessant need for validation is fascinating, yet irritating. Starting a thread......for the likes of this? Here, I'll help. Yes. You're right. You've been right all along. The (very few) others you target here with your post(s) have, apparently, not been right. Does that help? Except, this isn't the first airline contract go-'round for most of us. You seem to think it is. Most of us don't choose to engage with you (and you can consider me TOTD for doing so). Yet, the vast majority actually agree with your belief of the whole circus (more validation for you). And it's the same ol' back and forth with the same ol' players. It's tiresome. And unproductive (Yeah. I know. Ignore function). And you or anyone else will not sway another's beliefs on a dopey internet forum. Let it go. You and the other players can eviscerate me all you want. Don't care. Won't reply. Because, except for those select minority juicers (who also won't sway any arguments) we really are desirous of the same thing. See you on 1/31. We all want the same thing. Even those of us who they think are "juicers." We just don't agree on the negativity. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 2505268)
It wasn't long ago some of you made a bet we would have an agreement before Spirit. Want to come forward?
|
Originally Posted by Southerner
(Post 2505315)
We all want the same thing. Even those of us who they think are "juicers." We just don't agree on the negativity.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Southerner
(Post 2505315)
We all want the same thing. Even those of us who they think are "juicers." We just don't agree on the negativity.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Southerner
(Post 2505315)
We all want the same thing. Even those of us who they think are "juicers." We just don't agree on the negativity.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Negativity, on its own, is not constructive, but how can you defend the plain facts that B6 does not give a sh!t about its pilots? I have yet to see you list the many problems with this "Major"- All I ever read from you is a vilification of those of us awake enough to state the obvious. No offense, but the schoolhouse has skewed your perspective for life. Just go back and read your posts- they are all in defense of this cheap and dishonest airline. We deserve better from them-- and from you. Hope youre well. Bz |
Originally Posted by atrdriver
(Post 2506099)
Anyone who "wants the same thing" would follow the very basic instructions of their MEC and wear a simple ALPA lanyard, don't you think?
Nope. That's your opinion, and how you choose to support. I feel differently. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Alterbridge
(Post 2505307)
Jesus Christ.
Your incessant need for validation is fascinating, yet irritating. Starting a thread......for the likes of this? Here, I'll help. Yes. You're right. You've been right all along. The (very few) others you target here with your post(s) have, apparently, not been right. Does that help? Except, this isn't the first airline contract go-'round for most of us. You seem to think it is. Most of us don't choose to engage with you (and you can consider me TOTD for doing so). Yet, the vast majority actually agree with your belief of the whole circus (more validation for you). And it's the same ol' back and forth with the same ol' players. It's tiresome. And unproductive (Yeah. I know. Ignore function). And you or anyone else will not sway another's beliefs on a dopey internet forum. Let it go. You and the other players can eviscerate me all you want. Don't care. Won't reply. Because, except for those select minority juicers (who also won't sway any arguments) we really are desirous of the same thing. See you on 1/31. It is primarily about those who said I was "just being negative" and "not informed" and "you don't read your union emails" and "you're wrong, it will be done by summer 2017" and "you're wrong, it will surely be done by end of year 2017" and "#keepsgettingbetter" and "management is negotiating in good faith" and "at least our negotiations isn't going like Spirit's" and "I'll bet we have an agreement before Spirit" and PUKE! It's about reality and learning, for those that need it... And there are several who NEED it. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:59 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands