Originally Posted by Bluedriver (Post 2629218)

I know, and they were just about to hire Skywest! We have soo many extra slots and gates in our hubs, might as well have someone use all these unused resources.

And, our caterers have nothing to do most of the time...

Originally Posted by rvr1800 (Post 2629416)

Easy fix for that. Don’t replace the 190. Retire it and replace with 175’s.

Originally Posted by queue (Post 2629033)

I voted NO because it is the most responsible thing to do. No one is putting a gun to our head to sign right now. We can vote this thing down, fix the language, then vote Yes. I care about my fellow pilots and this profession. I'm not going to be fear-mongered into voting for sub-standard contracts just because of speculation or some emotional decision. This is a business deal and I'll only sign on to a good deal. This isn't. Something worth doing, is worth doing well. I don't like to half-a$$ things and I could not in good conscious, and due diligence, accept this substandard TA. Remember it took 3 tries to get ALPA here. Is it possible that accepting the first offer could be a bad decision?



https://i.imgur.com/exFESlx.jpg

This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.

Originally Posted by BunkerF16 (Post 2629060)

Or these bag tags I ordered.

Originally Posted by Mattio (Post 2629426)

People might think you voted No to the union (not the TA), it doesn't specify, at least in the image you shared... thought I'd try to save you the headache...

Originally Posted by Mattio (Post 2629426)

People might think you voted No to the union (not the TA), it doesn't specify, at least in the image you shared... thought I'd try to save you the headache...

Originally Posted by rvr1800 (Post 2629416)

Easy fix for that. Don’t replace the 190. Retire it and replace with 175’s.

Originally Posted by Bluedriver (Post 2629450)

I know! They were just about to do it! We foiled them, and their line of pilots chomping at those low wage jobs. No way that plan could have backfired. We saved them from themselves.

Originally Posted by Bluedriver (Post 2629450)

I know! They were just about to do it! We foiled them, and their line of pilots chomping at those low wage jobs. No way that plan could have backfired.

And trading out larger aircraft for smaller ones in this airline environment is wicked smart, all the other airlines are doing it! It's the new trend, small-gauging... We saved them from themselves.

Originally Posted by BunkerF16 (Post 2629436)

A discussion starter at the least. Hopefully with me wearing my P2P lanyard and buttons from all 3 events I helped with that would be a little more obvious what I was talking about. But your post is appreciated--I hadn't thought about that angle.