No.
02-18-2021 | 05:18 AM
#371
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
They can ask any way they want, the answer is still going to be Profit Sharing and more international ASM restrictions on flights within the range of current and FUTURE aircraft deliveries.
02-18-2021 | 05:26 AM
#372
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
and fc to fc (current cities and whatever fc is added in future, so they can’t change the term)
02-18-2021 | 05:33 AM
#373
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
02-18-2021 | 05:42 AM
#374
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
I believe the MGIA is also a violation. And it’s already signed and in place ready to go. So even if they don’t do the FC to FC and international stuff they wanted, they are still in violation.
MGIA detailshttps://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...growthince.htm
MGIA detailshttps://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...growthince.htm
02-18-2021 | 05:47 AM
#375
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,611
Likes: 14
From: blueJet
Good points. During the ALPA call-in show last week one astute pilot asked how we decide what the FCs are and can the company just change them?
One person answered that FCs are listed in the CBA. The CBA does contain a definition -
“Focus City: Any city publicly identified as such by the Company or any city where Pilots are Based.”
But I have not found any such list of focus cities in the CBA. So this may be a loophole that the MEC/NC has not discovered yet.
One person answered that FCs are listed in the CBA. The CBA does contain a definition -
“Focus City: Any city publicly identified as such by the Company or any city where Pilots are Based.”
But I have not found any such list of focus cities in the CBA. So this may be a loophole that the MEC/NC has not discovered yet.
02-18-2021 | 05:52 AM
#376
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 2
I believe the MGIA is also a violation. And it’s already signed and in place ready to go. So even if they don’t do the FC to FC and international stuff they wanted, they are still in violation.
MGIA detailshttps://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...growthince.htm
MGIA detailshttps://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...growthince.htm
02-18-2021 | 07:19 AM
#377
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 26
No.
So additional demand exists for extra weekend flights from jfk-Caribbean.
Guess who’s gonna fly them?
I was told it didn’t make sense for us to just let AA fly them. “They wouldn’t do that”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Guess who’s gonna fly them?
I was told it didn’t make sense for us to just let AA fly them. “They wouldn’t do that”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
02-18-2021 | 07:32 AM
#378
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
Just to remind everyone lest they forget, whether it is a codeshare or JV this was all made possible by LOA 12, that got this camels nose into tent.
02-18-2021 | 07:34 AM
#379
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
02-18-2021 | 07:37 AM
#380
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: Ending the Backlog one claim at a time
Actually that’s exactly how arbitration works.. Please educate yourself.. Ive been in the room for arbitration have you?? If it gets to arbitration current economic conditions will have influence on a arbitrators decision. If it gets there we will be lucky to get the gains or equivalent under the current economic conditions.. I hope it doesn’t get there and it probably won’t. My past experiences don’t make me particular confident in a good outcome for us, I also recognize that this is far from over.
